There was a time when poetry was viewed as the highest literary art form in human history. It was for about five minutes a few centuries ago. Ever since, poetry is a lot like football: Many try, few are any good, fewer still are good enough to go pro. Not that this has stopped “sensitive” people around the world from trying to be poets, of course, but now they might have new competition in the doggerel stakes: Computers.
The basic idea of Bot or Not comes out of, what else, a graduate thesis: Oscar Schwartz is investigating whether or not computers can write poetry. Part of that thesis was developing a website that has humans analyze verse from computers and verse from humans to see if you can tell them apart.
It’s not really a question of quality, so much, because most of the poems are awful. Take this gem:
more
Bot Or Not Proves That Robots And Humans Both Suck At Poetry | UPROXX
bot or not
I'm a fan of Dice Clay's work.
The basic idea of Bot or Not comes out of, what else, a graduate thesis: Oscar Schwartz is investigating whether or not computers can write poetry. Part of that thesis was developing a website that has humans analyze verse from computers and verse from humans to see if you can tell them apart.
It’s not really a question of quality, so much, because most of the poems are awful. Take this gem:
Never fled, and there to thought’s, my boast, without
One on a ring of men, three as finishing
Fate all bare sense of thee how hastily.
Oh may keep one thought of grave-damps o’er,
Some terrible 18th-century poet “revived” by a desperate grad student who needs a thesis subject?One on a ring of men, three as finishing
Fate all bare sense of thee how hastily.
Oh may keep one thought of grave-damps o’er,
more
Bot Or Not Proves That Robots And Humans Both Suck At Poetry | UPROXX
bot or not
I'm a fan of Dice Clay's work.
