Canadian Soldiers: Common debate important

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Commons debate on Afghanistan important for democracy: Canadian troops
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

at 13:48 on April 11, 2006, EST.
By MURRAY BREWSTER

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (CP) - Given the difference in time zones, it's fair to say most Canadian troops in Afghanistan happily snored through every word of the House of Commons debate over Canada's role in this war-torn region.

But on reflection Tuesday, many said they saw it as an important democratic exercise, one of the principles they put their lives on the line to instil in this fractured, violent country.

"As an open society, we certainly have our own opinions," said Lieut.-Col. Tom Doucette, commander of the provincial reconstruction team, based in Kandadar city.

"Some Canadians certainly support the mission and others may not support the mission. For a variety of reasons, we have to give each and every Canadian their due respect and their own opinion."

With an 8 1/2-hour time difference between the countries and an early evening Eastern time start for the Commons debate, staying up to hear what MPs had to say about their presence here would have been a stretch, even for the hardcore news junkies.

The pace of operations in southern Afghanistan and the unceasing violence, marked Tuesday by a rocket attack that killed seven children at a school west of Kabul, also left little time to dissect the speeches and political rhetoric.

Before the workday began, troops on the ground had a chance to read only a few brief transcripts of what was said and catch snippets of the late-night Canadian news, beamed in by satellite.

Given how much political attention was focused on the debate back home, some troops were surprised and even disappointed at the sparse Commons turnout, as well as the fact that some MPs left before everyone finished speaking.

"Was the debate useful?" Sgt. Frank Bird asked rhetorically. "In a way yes and in a way no. If they were going to have a debate like that they should have all been in the House debating."

http://start.shaw.ca/start/enCA/News/WorldNewsArticle.htm?src=w041155A.xml

So in the end the Commons debate is useful, has had no ill effect on Canadian troops, and to them was extremely important to them and the Canadian military which I am apart of.

So, everyone elses response to it isn't really as important unless it gave them a better insight into the Afghan mission.

Also, many NDP members appeared at the debate regardless to what people on this forum claim and it is a shame on Liberals, and Conservatives for not showing up to this debate.

Good for the NDP.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Interesting, and as I soldier I respect your opinion. Parlimentarians discussed about the deployment and even though you suport the military you still are not convinced by the mission.

However, are you better informed now after the debate even though it didn't make up your mine?
 

JonB2004

Council Member
Mar 10, 2006
1,188
0
36
RE: Canadian Soldiers: Co

Yes, I am more informed. Thank you for respecting my opinion.
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
The NDP wanted the debate for their concerns of the Mission. The Liberals were Hypocrites for demanding a debate because they didn't have a debate when they decided to send Canadian Troops to Afghanistan in the First place. The Conservatives had a debate even after when Prime Minister Harper didn't want one they still did, so the debate is done.

Canada will still be in Afghanistan doing the right thing, the most important thing is Canadian Soldiers know they have support at home.