Britain may lose Roman tombstone.

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,412
1,668
113
The Times February 09, 2006


Britain is likely to lose magnificent Roman tombstone
By Dalya Alberge, Arts Correspondent



EXCITEMENT over a Roman gravestone discovered in the centre of Lancaster has been dampened by the news that, although the artefact is barely out of the ground, Britain is likely to lose it to an overseas buyer.

Archaeologists said yesterday that the gravestone, which depicts with great clarity a mounted trooper holding a sword and the head of a man he has just killed, was a unique find.

The stone has yet to be dried, conserved and studied, but its owner — the developer on whose land it has been found — has already sought valuation advice from Sotheby’s.

Christopher Tudor-Whelan, director of Tudor-Whelan Property Holdings, which specialises in commercial investment properties, hopes to sell it in New York. He confirmed yesterday that he has been told that he can expect to sell it for “up to $100,000” (£57,500).

The gravestone, which commemorates a cavalry officer of the late 1st century or early 2nd century AD, was unearthed when archaeologists excavated land in the city centre before construction work began on a block of flats. Experts are overwhelmed by the artefact’s quality, although it is in three pieces and yet to be reassembled.

The stone, which originally would have measured 2.5m (8ft) in height, features a solar face, reminiscent of the famous Medusa head from Roman Bath, above the trooper’s head. The beheaded victim kneels on the ground, holding his sword.

Although beheading war victims was accepted Roman practice, it is thought that no such depiction of a man on horseback has been found before.

Importantly, the stone also bears an inscription that provides clues to the man to whom it was dedicated — a citizen of a Celtic tribe in northern Europe, the Treveri, which is known to have occupied an area where Belgium, Germany and France meet. The tribe was said to have provided Julius Caesar with his best cavalry.

The inscription refers to a man called Lucius Nisus Vodvilleius, or Insus, son of Vodullus. The precise name is unclear as it is abbreviated.

He served in the Ala Augusta, the Augustun cavalry stationed in Lancaster in the late 1st century. Although he had not been granted Roman citizenship, he had clearly achieved considerable status in the Roman Army.

The discovery will be published by British Archaeology tomorrow. Mike Pitts, the editor of the magazine, described the stone as “immensely exciting and seriously important”. He said: “Much of Roman sculpture is very fragmentary and, even if it is in good condition, it is not of a particularly high quality aesthetically. This is more or less complete, with a carving whose quality is superb.”

The stone is drying out now at the Lancashire County Museums Service in Preston. Mr Pitts believes that its rightful home is one of the Lancaster museums. “I can see people queueing down the block to see it,” he said.

Stephen Bull, curator of archaeology at the Museum of Lancashire, described the carving as “one of the sharpest and clearest I’ve ever seen”.

The developer confirmed to The Times that he was “in discussion” over selling it through Sotheby’s. Asked how he had felt when it was unearthed, he said: “The archaeological guys were more excited than me. I thought, ‘Oh my God, this will hold up the development’. At the end, the proof of the pudding is how much it is worth.”

An export licence will almost certainly be required for such an important piece, as it meets all the criteria governing the export of cultural objects.


thetimesonline.co.uk
 

Lotuslander

Electoral Member
Jan 30, 2006
158
0
16
Vancouver
I think not wrote:

Britain should return the parthenon frieze to its rightful owners while they're at it, the people of Greece.

I disagree, the Elgin marbles are seen by far more people in London than they would be in Athens. Plus Great Britian was instrumental in helping Greece gain its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Greec has thousands of classical statues and freizes Britian so few lets just call them compensation for all the hard work Britian did to help Greece gain its independence, then we could let the matter rest. Many feel that Lord elgin stole the marbles but, in truth there was no Greek government at the time and Elgin was in Athens in order to facilitate Greek independence, I think a little reward was in order.

I also think this question opens a pandora's box for museums. Nothing would be safe everything would have to go back to the country of origin. Canada would lose thousands upon thousands of artifacts, as would almost every country. In Fredricton, New Brunswick the Beaverbrook Art Gallery has amongst its collection paintings by Dali. The paintings were bought legally but Dali and his heirs have called for their return for years as they do not deem Fredricton a prestigious enough venue for the works of art, what would happen to them? Or how about all the artifacts now in private collections- collected as momentos and souvenirs, the return of the marbles would in effect relinquish anyone's claim to artifacts which they did not attain through legal methods. Roman coins dug up in England would be the property of Italy, that arrowhead you dug up in your back yard would belong to someone else. A slippery slope I say.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
As long as it stays puplic property I don't care where it is. However I do not believe robbing nations of there history is right. The Eyptions have lost countless treasurers to the French and the English in the past, often lost to private collections forever, robbing the world of our collective history. =-(