The ban on drilling for oil in the coastal waters of B.C. went into effect about 40 years ago. It was about to be lifted in the 1980s, but the Exxon Valdez ran aground and spilled its cargo...
Now the BC govt is asking the Feds to lift that ban. BCs Resources minister Neufeld says its too good to leave there, there is lots of oil and gas there.
Lots eh? Maybe thats a good reason to leave it there.
Lots means "lots more global warming". The more we burn now, the worse the severity of climate change will be, we are at the tipping poiint and emissions now are "tipping us into intolerable conditions". We can avoid the worst by reducing emissions now.
Lots means many tankers, with only one running aground and spilling its oily cargo that will ruin that remarkable ocean biosphere, which is richer than most ocean areas due to warm waters circulating there.
It is so rich that recreational divers choose to go there rather than elsewhere. But its not them we need to protect, its the biosphere.
One spill in 10 years isn't bad, right? NOT!!! One spill - perioid - is too much, it simply cannot be tolerated there.
But it is obvious that the environmental concerns will not trump the economic desires of wealthy oil corporations.
There is one concern that COULD make a difference though - you and I protesting this push to allow drilling off the coast of BC.
Just answer the poll to show how you feel... its a first step!
Now the BC govt is asking the Feds to lift that ban. BCs Resources minister Neufeld says its too good to leave there, there is lots of oil and gas there.
Lots eh? Maybe thats a good reason to leave it there.
Lots means "lots more global warming". The more we burn now, the worse the severity of climate change will be, we are at the tipping poiint and emissions now are "tipping us into intolerable conditions". We can avoid the worst by reducing emissions now.
Lots means many tankers, with only one running aground and spilling its oily cargo that will ruin that remarkable ocean biosphere, which is richer than most ocean areas due to warm waters circulating there.
It is so rich that recreational divers choose to go there rather than elsewhere. But its not them we need to protect, its the biosphere.
One spill in 10 years isn't bad, right? NOT!!! One spill - perioid - is too much, it simply cannot be tolerated there.
But it is obvious that the environmental concerns will not trump the economic desires of wealthy oil corporations.
There is one concern that COULD make a difference though - you and I protesting this push to allow drilling off the coast of BC.
Just answer the poll to show how you feel... its a first step!