£420,000 for a 'women's park' in Afghanistan... funded by British taxpayers

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
£420,000 for a 'women's park' in the war zone... funded by British taxpayers

By GLEN OWEN
2nd February 2008
Daily Mail

Ministers have been accused of wasting taxpayers' money after spending nearly £500,000 on a fun park in Afghanistan's most dangerous region.

The three-acre "women's park" in Lashkar Gah, Helmand, is in the middle of an area known more for explosions and kidnappings than the sound of children at play. Locals are mystified why money has been spent on a recreational facility when the security situation continues to deteriorate.


Park strife: The locals at Lashkar Gah are wary of the Taliban


On Thursday, a suicide bomber killed six people at a mosque in the town, including the deputy governor of the province.

The park was built for £420,000 by the UK-led Provincial Reconstruction Team, which has been given £9million by the British Government to spend on "quick-impact projects" in Helmand.

Its lawns - which feature picnic areas and children's play facilities including a full-size ferris wheel - are laid out by the Helmand river, but on the side menaced by the Taliban.

The area on the outskirts of the town is regarded as off-limits by many residents. As a rich opium-harvesting spot, it is subject to power struggles and the main road is frequently hit by explosions.

And, despite its name, the park is not a favourite with women from the largely Pashtun local population who are expected to stay at home.

Tory frontbencher Tobias Ellwood, who has served in Bosnia with the Royal Green Jackets, criticised the development.

He said: "Is this park a priority for a province which produces half the world's opium supply and has no recognised rule of law, poor irrigation systems, few metalled roads and unemployment at over 70 per cent?"

Locals also questioned the wisdom of building the park. "Mines will be laid in the park.

That will keep people from going there," said Gul Mohammad, a farmer, while Amir Mohammad added: "We should first worry about peace and security. Then we can have parks."

A spokesman for the Department for International Development said: "The park is providing much needed recreational space and facilities.

"It is popular and is in constant use, with children using it every day after school."

dailymail.co.uk
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Why would you suppose the government of Britain would have any greater interest in promoting the de-childization of society than say the Canadian or American governments?

As long as someone is making money selling amusement park equipment....
 

einmensch

Electoral Member
Mar 1, 2008
937
14
18
Amusement Park!
I guess that is more important than the 3.5 million Afghan refugees that have been created.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Perhaps it was created because it makes a very convenient target for the Taliban. As always, it only appears as if the UK and USA are out to stop terrorism when, in fact, they are out to foment it for the benefit of war profiteers.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Wow, damned if you do and damned if you don't.


"We should stop fighting a war and focus on reconstruction"

So someone does and the immediate response

"Are you nuts? You can't have reconstruction when there is someone trying to kill you!"

So are we all agreed? Back to guns and less butter? I guess this means no more talk about needing reconstruction from Gopher then?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
``I guess this means no more talk about needing reconstruction from Gopher then? ``


Reconstruction begins after a cessation of hostilities. Otherwise, you're only creating more easy targets and making innocents more vulnerable.