22 USA Senators decry SPP - NA Union

[Karlin]

The concern over the secrative meeting in Montebello this weekend are the same in the USA as in Canada - elected officials and parliamentary bodies are being left out of the planning when it comes to the SPP - North American Union {SPP = Security and Prosperity partnership]

22 senators are airing their concerns about the stealh with which this fundamental change is taking place. Their names appear in the article at the first link below.

What we are losing is regulation of corporate activites. That will mean more of the problems like we are seeing with CHINESE IMPORTS - a factor of lack of regulation and control over corporate activities - pollution, safety in consumer goods, etc etc.


Other articles also -


Scores In Congress Protest North American Union Agenda
22 Congressmen write to President in opposition to SPP as secret Montabello confab begins
http://infowars.net/articles/august2007/200807SPP.htm

Peter Mackay is no match for the guile and power of Condy Rice, but here he is meeting with her to give away Canada's water and oil -

http://www.infowars.net/articles/february2007/260207SPP.htm

Quotes:

the Bush administration is running a "shadow government" without congressional oversight in conjunction with Canada and Mexico

"AMERO" - new currency for Canada ? -
at a recent high-level confab in Banff, an assistant U.S. secretary of state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a panel that featured a presentation by Prof. Robert Pastor, author of a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

Social Security, roads, military, intelligence gathering, regulations, federal agencies - all within the US, Canada and Mexico are being merged into one system at the cost of national sovereignty and the common law.

 

[Karlin]

Much of the pro-SPP rhetoric includes "that we live in a very dangerous post 9-11 world"

no we don't!! -
1] Canada does NOT need to share that concern with the USA, even if there was a threat to the USA

2] there is no threat - have you noticed the suicide bombers in the USA lately? Me neither.
- There has NEVER been any terrorism in Canada by the so-called 'islamic radicals', ever!!

3] the war on terror is fake - it is about commerce, excuses to fight wars of choice and commerce, and about securing Arab oil for America, where global warming is the result.
By the way, global warming has the likely potential to be a far greater threat than terrorism, so going after the oil and destroying Iraq and killing 100s of 1000s of people to do it at a time when we really need to be cutting back on fossil fuels.

If they spent half as much money on soalr panels as they do on the wars of choice for oil, we could beat the global warming problem. Then they would not have to invade soveriegn oil-rich nations.

 

[Toro]

There is no Amero on the way.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

If it were, the $2 trillion dollar-a-day currency market - where the American dollar is the lynch pin of all trading - would be all over this. Yet you hear absolutely nothing about it.

Not. One. Single. Thing.

This argument in and of itself should invalidate all the other NAU/SPP conspiracy theories combined.