2007 Budget Survives

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
What are you guys complaining about, this is politics, vote getting, favor delivering, population manipulation. If its not one party it will be another. When did we ever have a government that truly worked for the people first with no hidden agenda?
This is a game , appreciate it as one,. This one is interesting, who's for it and why, and who will it benefit, and how it plays out.
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto

The conservative party with reform western separate roots is finding out that if you want to remain the leader of a minority government you cannot play hardball with the other parties you have to compromise.

The first half of their leadership they tried to act like a party that had a majority and found out very quickly when you try to pass pro conservative bills it always fizzles in the committee stage because they do not have a majority.

They sold out their conservative voters with this budget but they got the support of the bloc, which means Quebec.

This is why the conservative party will never get a majority.

And if you look at it, Harper wants to hold onto power for another two years so he can qualify for his golden pension.
 

s243a

Council Member
Mar 9, 2007
1,352
15
38
Calgary
The conservative party with reform western separate roots is finding out that if you want to remain the leader of a minority government you cannot play hardball with the other parties you have to compromise.

The first half of their leadership they tried to act like a party that had a majority and found out very quickly when you try to pass pro conservative bills it always fizzles in the committee stage because they do not have a majority.

They sold out their conservative voters with this budget but they got the support of the bloc, which means Quebec.

This is why the conservative party will never get a majority.

And if you look at it, Harper wants to hold onto power for another two years so he can qualify for his golden pension.

In my opinion Harper has mad sensible compromises. A leader must listen to the people. What is important is to keep enough principles to remind voters on why they voted for them. When Harper compromises as much as Mr Dithers then it will be time for him to go.
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto
Originally Posted by s243a
When Harper compromises as much as Mr Dithers then it will be time for him to go.

Harper is Mr. Blunders because when he got elected as minority leader he still didn't get it.
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
$4.1B over two years to one province to spend, or not, as it pleases compared to $4.6B over 5 years for national housing, education, environment foreign aid and worker protection programs.

I can see how you would prefer one over the other.:lol:
 

crit13

Electoral Member
Mar 28, 2005
301
4
18
Whitby, Ontario
Looks like the Liberal supporters enjoyed playing the game called politics when they had made up the rules as they went along.

Now that the shoe is on the other foot, it burns them up inside. As a previous poster noted, a good leader compromises which is exactly what he did with this budget.

He could have easily provided deep tax cuts across the board but then the liberals would complain that he didn't spend enough on programs. There is no budget that would have satisfied the Liberals. I hope we have an election this year so that Liberal members can try and explain why they voted down a budget that essentially liberal in nature.

The Liberals are obviously not conservative. They aren't even liberal anymore. They tried being green and that has been a failure. Now they are trying to be far left with even less success. What exactly does todays Liberal party stand for anyway? Does anyone really know?