Search results

I have read it and my assessment still stands - the components that you've forwarded do not tie together. standing alone, sure, I have no problem with them, but the you expect me to take the leap of faith in correlating A with B with C, etc when those studies are (essentially) independent of...

We've had this discussion previously and we have conflicting fundamental positions, it's pointless to continue. The fact is, unless I subscribe to your position, the studies/research/science that you've offered requires me to make giant leaps of faith. The reference you made to not needing to...

That's a great observation... I'd never considered that potential.

This is by far and away the biggest obstacle that the pro GW alarmist movement faces. Even if one wishes to challenge the "source" (ie, solar radiation), the fact remains that the largest swings have occurred in the absence of any anthropogenic input at all. In the end, I believe that this is...

There is a big difference (in confidence/causation) between the above explanation and "apparently enhancing". Going further, assessing specific causation confounds the confidence to a greater extent. Fair enough, but the emission of CO2 from natural sources related to cyclical decomposition...

What exactly does that mean? "Apparently enhancing" an existing phenomenon - would that be a reasonable interpretation? If so, how does one definitively split-out the anthropogenic components from the "natural" ones? Combustion occurs in many ways, many of which are entirely natural. I'll...

The difference in this issue is that you are claiming that you do know why. ... And you were unable to answer the question then, just as now. The links you've offered in the past not only offered a speculation and conjecture at best. The fact is, no scientific discipline (or combination...

:canada:.. But it's a helluva good time.:canada:

So is herpes... You go after that too?:ky: It's hot today... I'm thinking that I'd better start the car and get the A/C running for 10-15 minutes to cool 'er down a bit before I drive to the corner store.

Anna. None of what you responded to was actually directed at you, so if Tonnington wishes to respond, then I'll get back to him/her on it. BTW, I don't invest much in the bigs as they are capitalized on such a massive scale, it is near impossible for me to make any meaningful cash on dividends...

I've often wondered and speculated that he was in bed with one (or more) of the companies that you were to "buy" carbon offsets from. Are you familiar with the group(s) that he's invested with? I've taken a look at the studies you've posted and I stand by my comments to date. I do not...

You know that they will never do anything like that Petros... For those in the extreme camp(s) anti & pro AGW, selectivity of information and sources is an absolute necessity in preserving their position and saving face. On M. Strong note, look into "who" invested into India coal-fired plants...

There are a ton of theories, and that in itself is representative of the myriad of 'potential realities' that exist in today's perspective.

"Should have known that would be a waste of time. You'll never even attempt to read a scientific paper, much less understand a whole string of them which put a coherent narrative together." What a compelling argument. Tell ya what. Point me in the direction that provides the conclusive...

Show me Anna.. Show the entire world how these "associations" and "apparent" elements are conclusive, factual or support any of the AGW bullsh*t... Go on Anna, do it. You can't Anna. All you are capable of doing is throwing out a barrage of emotionally charged, unsubstantiated rhetoric. Your...

... But not conclusive. "Apparent" and "associated" are not indicative of confirmation/conclusive that anthropogenic sources of CO2 are causing any significant warming effect. The point being made about the green tech is that it cannot justify it's own operations without the input of massive...

I have yet to see anything that is empirical and capable of conclusively tying everything together. The suggestion I believe that Petros made refers to a serious conflict of interest with the aforementioned individual. Further, as Eaglesmack has correctly pointed-out, the current green...

Look into their investments while you're at it

That's the understatement of the century. I see... So, the information and conclusions were entirely based on the efforts of the newspaper group then?.. Are you suggesting that they fabricated the entire thing? I'm thinking that this is an example of you comprehension issues. See above...

The ole "that's what you are but what am I?" retort... A compelling argument from a 4 year old but from you, well, sad and pathetic. I suppose that it is what I've come to expect from you Quite What part of the newspaper article being based on a study don't you understand?.. This isn't...