Search results

Looks like we'll have to adjust the ole consensus numbers, eh?

This one line might answer your question. PS - Insurers are simply laying the groundwork as to the big increase you'll see in premiums... And yes, the windshield coverage on your car insurance will go waaayyyy up because of climate change too. (I can't believe you buy this bilge)

Just following your lead

Maybe he's out sourcing a lawyer that is ready to take action against online, forum, alternate opinion. Count Lothian might be able to help refer a top tier lawyer for the cause

ITT, eh? I'm guessing that they offered a course on that too Fukk!!!... I laughed out loud reading that from the Usual Suspect that explains absolutely nothing and contributes even less to the discussion. Kudos, it's been aeons since I laughed that hard Yawn... Try this: Google Like I...

All you post is rhetoric and platitudes... Moreover, you have zero interest or ambition in actually uncovering any info on your own accord. It's pointless for myself or any other to provide any info to you as it is wasted. As the expression goes; you can lead a horse to water, but you can't...

Google This will go a long way in answering your questions... I don't have the interest in schooling someone that refuses to see reality .. Which brings us back to the original question: What (by definition) is a 'climate scientist' and do academic institiutions offer dedicated studies and...

'Peer review' was already determined as being crooked. Look into it and you too will chuckle when you hear that term

Spare me the sad country song pal. All you have offered are platitudes and rhetoric... I laughed my azz off when you went on how climate change was of intense interest to millions of Canadians... What a load - no one, other than the handful of fanatics and clowns like Suzuki give a crap about...

Make sure you start it with the A/C on full.... Myself, I insist on being able to get into a nice, climate controlled vehicle and not a hot and stuffy one. Give 'er about 10 minutes - have a snack inside the house - and she ought to be just right by then

In order for the truther model to work, the reader must buy into the AGW cult in addition to dismissing a variety of inputs (like solar for example)... Furthermore, the model also requires that you dismiss all of the damning evidence as it pertains to the unethical, immoral 'scientific' fix that...

I don't need to read them as the truther models, in principle, have no capacity to explain the past or predict the future. We have seen the many projections, all of which I have seen have fallen flat. You can call it comprehensive, it's also called selective inputs that are designed to...

That's all that's left then, eh?... Bitter little tears from one that is just beginning to realize that AGW (opps - climate change) was nothing but a flimsy house of cards Easier solution is to encourage the belief within their ranks that the Mother Ship will soon be arriving to whisk them...

How about the Scientologists? Truthers should be all over that one - 'science' and religious fanaticism all rolled into one

Kinda like the UN/IPCC

At least the pot growers don't operate on a for-profit basis... never, not once

This is yesterday's news... Hardly a week goes by without some kind of undermining of the AGW (sorry, climate change) position. If it's not outright frauds or law suits where the plaintiff (now defendant) vehemently refuses to provide evidence (that would prove AGW or climate change no doubt)...

Wow... More 'facts' from a blogger. Yep, the debate is over

I hear that ice ages one of the side effects of rampant anthropogenic global warming

You tell me: Has the North Pole been ice free since 2013?