Search results

Yeah, the second part of the Treason Clause is "or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." Lord Haw-Haw was hanged for what Trump did today.

Yes we will, despite the best efforts of the people you support. But don't get all fussed, I ain't calling you a traitor. I'm calling you an enemy of my country.

You're saying it's effectively the same as the BLM/Antifa riots. You're either lying, or too stupid to distinguish between a crime and an act of war.

All the things you describe are crimes. Seizing the seat of government by force is an act of war. You are a purveyor of false equivalencies and an apologist for treason.

The text reads "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." -- U.S. Const., Art. III, sec. 3 (the Treason Clause) Seizing the seat of government by force, however briefly and/or incompetently...

Treason. U.S. Const., Art. III, sec. 3.

Only Canadians would think sending tweets is "fighting."

I notice none of the freedom fighters are naked. Guess they don't believe in freedom. Just accept the laws that say you gotta cover your fun stuff in public. Sheep.

How binary. If you really wanna be inclusive, it should be "Aperson."

The "rest" of Congress? That implies that Biden is part of Congress.

Well, he just got a veto overridden for the first time. The ships are leaving the sinking rat.

I favor child labor, myself.

The solution, or at least a dramatic improvement, is obvious to anybody with the sense to pour piss out of a boot. That's why I don't present it here. It would just confuse all y'all who have it as an article of faith that everything any cop does is right, and will trot out such outrageous...

I think we were pretty divided 1861-1865. And I'm actually pretty cool with being "divided" from unvaccinated, two-legged plague rats.

I wouldn't know. I don't have anything to do with Twitter.

I would say that no, it wasn't. That what the cops saw was a big, Black, dangerous man with a deadly weapon, and that's the entire problem. But why bother? You'll reject anything that suggests that there's something wrong when a man who has been fired from or rejected by multiple police...

The funny part is that there are people here stupid enough to think that every op-ed published in the Washington Post is the opinion of the Post.

You really don't have a clue how this works, do you?

Shooting dead a twelve-year-old playing in a park is your notion of common sense?

So. . . 100 is equal to 20? Or is it equal to 50? Or are you just retarded?