Search results

Report what? That he was angry and didn't like his mother and grandmother? Even if true, what basis is that for denying a fundamental Constitutional right? Can we deny everybody who's angry the right to freedom of speech and the press? Might as well shut down Fox News.

I'm a firm believer in the death penalty. BUT. . . Don't let the prosecutors play with it. If you do, you end up with situations like the Sonniers, where as best we know (there's considerable question), the brother who was executed was NOT the one who pulled the trigger. Define by statute...

OK, I would support a law requiring mobile-phone manufacturers to devise ways to disable the texting feature of phones whilst a car is in motion. And I would support laws dramatically increasing the penalties for texting & driving. I'd ask you what laws you'd support to keep pissed-off teenage...

Cuz cops n' donuts is a love affair that will endure forever!

Sure. If one or more of the parents can afford several tens of thousands of dollars for a lawyer, they can get on the court docket and have their case heard in. . . oh, probably 2025 or so. Qualified immunity. Case dismissed.

We can send you a crack anti-terrorist unit from Texas to secure the Tim Hortons! Y'all just need to explain to them it's Canadian for "Krispy Kreme."

Well, good thing they achieved their primary objective.

If you want to speak French, go to France! If you want to speak English, go to. . . um. . .

Nonsense. It'll be easy as breathing.

Yes, you've made it clear that there is no circumstance under which you will blame anybody wearing a badge.

They keep saying there's 21 dead (plus the shooter), but wutabout co-morbidities? I don't trust the number, cuz co-morbidities.

Clearly you've never seen a porcupine in its defensive posture.

In what way is that not true? The police don't prevent crime. Sometimes they solve it. But as the saying goes "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away." If the cops stopped crime in progress, you'd think it would happen more often, considering what we spend on them.

It is amazing the lengths to which you will go to justify nineteen armed, armoured, trained adults who take a paycheck to protect and serve, not having the balls to get stuck in, but with plenty of mojo to tackle and tase the people who were willing to get stuck in. Is there anybody so bad that...

Pretty awesome match. First half, they didn't look they even belonged in Div 2. Courtois was a miracle.

Yobs.

Pretty clear you want to just say "Good game, guys. You did the best you could. Can't win 'em all. Let's go get a beer. Pay no attention to the twenty-one corpses. Just one of those things."

Since Columbine in 1999, the "protocol" has been to get stuck in and engage the shooter. It's been extensively trained for over 20 years. So, yes, that's what the experts who design police training want. But I'm sure you know better than they do.

It's probably not their fault that they have guns, there are children dying, and they don't have the balls to do anything. But it totally disqualifies them from being cops.

Well, Ramos protected nineteen of 'em. They'll never see a picture of genitals.