Search results

I'll do even better, I will give you a source of lists: Most cited authors on climate change

Prove it, ya dummy. Post some stuff that backs up your goofy opinion or STFU. lol

Wrong. I have a list of climate experts but you refuse to accept any research from them that refutes your ignorant opinion. Like I said, there's no point in bothering when you ignore whatever evidence anyone posts anyway. You flat-earthers probably think gravity is BS and you won't accept...

yeah well, you say a lot. Mostly crap but it's a lot.

So you don't think that the Trail area is any better off, I guess. Well, that's your problem and I can't help what you think, even if it's stupid.

Why? It wouldn't matter if I gave you the list anyway. You're too stubborn to poke your nose out of the mud and take a look so it doesn't matter what I post.

You skipped school? Here it is in simple terms: crap in container = no crap in environment = good for environment.

Only when the clueless didn't understand it in the first place.

Idiot. I didn't say that. I said they used money to clean up their act. And Teck Com didn't sweep anything, they contain their pollution. Go back to the top of your shytepile or learn to understand English.

Didn't see my sarcasm in that post? Wanna borrow my cheaters? Here: So who said money would change anything? Not me. Maybe you need to borrow my cheaters, too. Here ya go: Couple posts back I said, "I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as...

Why ask me? Do I look like Google?

Is that what I am doing? Tell me more. I don't trust any research without peer reviews and other methods of screening. I sure as hell don't leap on a denial bandwagon just because I don't like some research.

Speaking of silly quips ...... That's what happens when gov'ts cut back on university research funding and big companies increase their purchase of science. Kind of a vicious circle; cut funding for more objective research and hand the research over to decidedly biased sources. Did I hear anyone...

Yeah. We all know the climate never changes. :rolleyes: lol Yep. The consensus says water is wet. Must be wrong alright. Funny thing abour deniers who demand evidence; they rarely provide any of their own. So all they have left is to nitpick and make silly little quips. lmao. Funny you should...

roflmao You just keep thinking that. It's good for you. Right. There appears to be no death of any opinion. They do? Some decades back, perhaps they did. Mud house.

lol.

The article said the population was stable, not multiplying.

Melting ice means polars have to spend more time on land. That means more competition with other bears for food. What kind of condition were all these polar bears in that the 2 to 3000 polars are in? Are they healthy? Numbers of bears don't tell very much, but myopic people don't think of stuff...

It looks like they call them Honey Smacks now. Kellogg's Official Website | Breakfast, Snacks, Recipes, Cereal

Me, too. lol We also have cereal as snacks while relaxing and watching the idiot box at night. :D We've had flapjacks, eggs, bacon, etc. for dinner at times. :D