Search results

No, your brain is suffering global cooling.

I guess you slept through the fact that Mulroney was in power during the early 1990s while CN rail was in the process of being prepared for sale. No doubt someone else in his party engineered the sell-off while Mulroney wasn't looking. And I see you are desperately trying to backtrack on...

Then as I said it is probably considered a US export. One day you might actually get something right in a discussion with me, but this isn't the day. The Americanization of CN https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/the-americanization-of-cn And just what has global warming got to...

You probably see US owned companies using Canadian rails because the Mulroney government sold off a lot of CN owned track a number of years ago to private interests. My guess is that if the coal is mined in the US then it probably goes out through US ports, and if it isn't it still doesn't...

Yeah, I'm really looking forward to the emerging industrial giant of Zimbabwe. BTW Zimbabwe coal production = 2 million tonnes China coal production = 284 million tonnes That question has nothing to do with the topic, but since you ask 16% of Canada's coal exports go to China.

Its Zimbabwe. China probably burns more coal in five minutes than the country burns in a year.

it is not really a new tax. We've had taxes on fuels for decades.

Kindly supply me with that information.

How diesel electric engines work is beside the point; that is why I added it as a footnote. I maintain that renewable energy sources will eventually overtake fossil fuels and if current statistics are to be believed I have a lot of support for that argument. World use of renewables doubled...

Doesn't matter. People want cheap clean energy and fossil fuels are being outdone on both fronts. Fifty years from now almost all of that oil will still be there and the demand will be zero. I'm not kidding anyone. Wind and solar are already cheaper than fossil fuels and they have several...

As I have said. Climate change is irrelevant. Fossil fuels are on their way out regardless.

Only if you are uninformed enough enough to believe that global warming means an end to snow.

Maybe it has to do with all the hot air blowing out of the rectums of climate change deniers.

Yes please say more. I'd really like to know how the two bloodiest wars in history were scams.

Why am I not surprised that you think it is of significance?

That remark is so cryptic I'm betting even you don't understand it.

What are you trying to prove? That actual historical incidents happened? That is what history and science are all about; documenting what happened and changing the information and data available if a better answer is revealed. The so-called Gulf of Tonkin incident isn't news. Historians have...

That nonsense has been disproved multiple times. One of the more effective rebuttals was conducted by Mythbusters.

Maybe you should give a lecture about the teamsters who drove horse drawn vehicles in 1900 being put out of business. It was also the equivalent of a multi-trillion dollar business, but that did not stop the move to the internal combustion engine. You should also know that electric light...

Just someone trying to make a living pedaling nonsense. He isn't the first charlatan to appear with stories of bogeymen and he won't be the last.