Which city in Maryland is the most powerful city on the planet ? Inquiring minds want to know .Yeah, the most powerful city on the planet. You don't know anything about it, so you make stuff up.
That article failed to mention the .68 dollar . Just some of the reason for it .Poilievre held a rally at RBC Place London just hours before he was to learn who he’ll be facing in the next federal election, which could be called as early as this week.
It was clear from Poilievre’s remarks to a crowd of about 2,500 supporters that he believes his opponent will be Mark Carney, the former governor of the Bank of Canada who served as an economic advisor to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
View attachment 27976(No mention was made of the other three candidates: Chrystia Freeland, Karina Gould and Frank Baylis)
Carney claims three more years of deficit to invest in growing the Canadian economy, and then we’ll get right back to balance. If Mark Carney’s pledge sounds like something you’ve heard before, that’s because Justin Trudeau made a very similar commitment a mere ten years ago.
We spent a ton of money and ran up debt at record rates under the Liberals to get our economy growing again. This year alone, the federal government expects to spend $48.3 billion more than it collects in revenues. Meanwhile, Canadians are still waiting patiently for that return to balanced budgets.
View attachment 27977
When the Trudeau government came into office at the end of 2015, our economy was producing $57,491 per person (in 2017 dollars). Today, nine years later, our economy is producing $58,951 per person (in those same 2017 dollars).
Boiled down, this means that Canadians are now a whopping 2.5 per cent richer, on average, then when Trudeau took office almost ten years ago. Wow. It would seem that the promised growth, much like the return to balanced budgets, somehow failed to materialize.
Have costs for pretty much everything increased in the last 10 years, including the carbon tax, which is…a tax on everything? While the government attempted to stimulate growth artificially by borrowing and spending money, tax hikes and new bureaucratic and regulatory hurdles countervailed this by slowing down private investment.
When we account for inflation, we find that the level of investment per person across all sectors of the economy (excepting the public sector) has fallen by 8%.
While Mark Carney may use different words to promote them, his plans to grow Canada’s economy with government spending and deficits are eerily similar to those put forward ten years earlier by the very prime minister he is now hoping to “replace.”![]()
BROUSSARD: Trudeau and Carney are singing the same tune on deficits — Toronto Sun
Just three more years of deficit to invest in growing the Canadian economy, and then we’ll get right back to balance. If Mark Carney’s pledge sounds like something you’ve heard before, that’s because Justin Trudeau made a very similar commitment a mere ten years ago. To refresh your memory...apple.news
View attachment 27978
View attachment 27982
Proroquation . Who knows ? When will Justin give another tear filled goodbye ?When does the House sit?
Election adds have been running for a year. CBC never stopped doing liberal election adds since the last election.No majority, straight to GG. Election ads are already running.
Canada has wanted, and needed, change long before Trump was elected.We want change!
Trump wins.
We want same!
A change of diapers.Canada has wanted, and needed, change long before Trump was elected.
Shovels and pick up trucks.Does his "plan" include how that NG will be extracted and transported?
Maybe we just have different notions of what a "plan" is.
This is why our electoral system must be changed. That a tiny region of one province can determine the future of the whole country is just wrong.Let’s say, if just for the sake of argument, that the outcome of the federal election depends on how the vote goes in Ontario.
Because that’s the way it usually goes, and nothing in the dynamics of this campaign suggests there’s a compelling reason to expect it to be different. Conservative Leder Pierre Poilievre can sweep all of Alberta and the best he’ll pick up is two Liberal seats. Ontario has 74 Liberals, more than three times the total for all of western Canada. That being the case, Poilievre has considerable work to do to if he wants the province to help make him prime minister.
Ontario figures now show Liberals and Tories in a dead heat, with New Democrats falling off a cliff. Polls, of course, are not holy writ, but the uniformity of the findings across so many surveys suggests its safe to conclude Poilievre’s standing in Ontario was never a love affair, but the result of a marriage gone sour. Ontarians didn’t favour Poilievre so much as they’d come to detest Trudeau. They wanted him gone, and if supporting Conservatives was the best way to achieve his departure, they’d make do with Conservatives.
View attachment 28235
But Trudeau is gone now. The boil has been lanced. A Trudeauless Liberal party doesn’t annoy Ontario the way his ongoing presence did. Poilievre has to accept that reality, and retool his message appropriately if he aims to regain lost ground. Even as the election begins, there’s no real evidence he’s willing to do that. Tory messaging remains consistent: Liberals are all the same, a Carney government would be a continuation of the Trudeau government, Carney is just like Justin, after nine years of failure and disappointment why vote for more of the same?
Like it or not, Poilievre needs the province in his win column. In particular he needs to steal Liberal ridings in the narrow corridor bordering Lake Ontario from Niagara Falls to Oshawa that might as well be renamed the Liberal Horseshoe for all the presence Conservatives enjoy. Half the province lives there and is the reason Liberals have dominated Ottawa for so long. If Poilievre hopes too best Carney, he’ll have to find a way to do it there.![]()
Kelly McParland: Sorry folks, but Poilievre's fate rests with Ontario — National Post
Conservatives need to retool if they hope to win the provinceapple.news
It’s based on one person one vote & we just don’t live in that dog pile density wise through much of the rest of the country. I get what you’re saying, but this is the way that it is.This is why our electoral system must be changed. That a tiny region of one province can determine the future of the whole country is just wrong.