Iranically Iran, Middle East’s Karen…

[petros]

Its the new Iranian (Aryan) Prez. He is at odds with IRCG.

First the Jewish Space Fog now a President abandoning Hezbollah.

Adolf Netanyahu says we must be friends (for the rail and pipeline to Asia? Its easier to get there through Iran) blah blah blah.

A coupe.

I'll be darned. Its fucking plausible.

FAQ: Unravelling the Mystery of "Electric Fog"

1. What is Electric Fog? Electric Fog, also known as St. Elmo's Fire, is a natural phenomenon that occurs when a strong electric field is present in the atmosphere. It appears as a glowing discharge of electricity around pointed objects such as trees, ships, or aircrafts.

2. How does Electric Fog form? Electric Fog forms when there is a large difference in electrical potential between the ground and the atmosphere. This can be caused by thunderstorms, volcanic eruptions, or even friction between air molecules. The electric field ionizes the air molecules, creating a glowing plasma discharge.

3. Is Electric Fog dangerous? Electric Fog itself is not dangerous, as it is a natural occurrence and does not produce enough current to harm humans. However, it can be an indication of an impending thunderstorm or lightning strike, which can be dangerous.

4. How is Electric Fog studied by scientists? Scientists use specialized equipment such as lightning detection networks and atmospheric sensors to study Electric Fog. They also conduct experiments in controlled environments to understand the physics behind its formation and behavior.

5. Can Electric Fog be harnessed as a source of energy? While there have been some attempts to harness the energy of Electric Fog, it is not a reliable or efficient source of energy. The amount of energy produced is small and highly unpredictable, making it unsuitable for practical use.

Reference: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/unravelling-the-mystery-of-electric-fog.185797/

Lets get Physical Physical I wanna get Geophysical.

What is quartz content of the mtn range with Jew Space fog used to drop a chopper?

Is granite piezoelectric?


Granite is also a piezoelectric material because of its quartz and other piezoelectric minerals content. Matsuda et al. measured the piezoelectric coefficient of a granite sample using an atomic force microscope and gave an apparent piezoelectric coefficient of 7.0 0.1 10 C/N [42] .

https://www.researchgate.net › publication

Piezoelectric Measurements of Granite as Composite Material ...​

So add in a high intensity electromagnetic beam from space to a large mass of quartz to trigger a piezo discharge triggering a flash fog and a geomagnetic pulse that knocks out electronics.

Jew Space Fog. Very plausible.

 

[Ron in Regina]

As sirens sounded over Tel Aviv, the flares from missiles were seen in the skies above the capital Tehran and the cities of Kermanshah, Karaj and Isfahan, according to videos broadcast by Iranian state television.

The White House had warned earlier that Iran was preparing to launch a ballistic missile attack against Israel. The expected barrage comes days after Israel killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and hours after the Israeli military confirmed a limited military operation inside Lebanon. The U.S. will help Israel defend itself against the expected strikes, a senior White House official said, similarly to how it shot down missiles and drones when Iran launched a major attack in April.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it had launched “tens of ballistic missiles” in response to the killing of Nasrallah and Guard commander Abbas Nilforoushan. It warned that any Israeli retaliation would be met with “further crushing and destructive acts.”

Iran Attacks Israel With Missiles, Drawing Vows of Retaliation — The Wall Street Journal

Escalation comes days after Israel killed Hezbollah leader and risks a wider war in the Middle East

apple.news

Iran launches wave of missiles at Israel — Global News

Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel on Tuesday in retaliation for Israel's campaign against Tehran's Hezbollah allies in Lebanon.

apple.news

Iran says attack on Israel is retaliation for killing Hamas and Hezbollah leaders — NBC News

Iran said in a statement after it began its missile attack on Israel that it was a response to the killings of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders. NBC News’ Richard Engel reports that Iran said Israel would “face crushing attacks” if it responded.

apple.news

Iran said in a statement after it began its missile attack on Israel that it was a response to the killings of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders. NBC News’ Richard Engel reports that Iran said Israel would “face crushing attacks” if it responded.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Here we go again.

 

[Ron in Regina]

Here we go again.

Iran launched hundreds of missiles at cities across Israel on Tuesday, in what the country’s Revolutionary Guard said was retaliation for Israel’s recent assassinations of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.

The barrage also came the same day that Israel confirmed that it had begun what it said was a limited military operation in southern Lebanon aimed at uprooting the Iranian-backed Hezbollah, raising the prospect of a wider regional war across the Middle East.

Netanyahu vows to retaliate after Iran fires ballistic missiles over killings of Hamas, Hezbollah leaders — The Globe and Mail

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to retaliate after Iran fired hundreds of missiles at Israeli cities, forcing citizens to find shelter

apple.news

 

[petros]

Heres the nuke B0Ner has been waiting.

 

[Ron in Regina]

Heres the nuke B0Ner has been waiting.

The Law of Armed Conflict, also known as International Humanitarian Law (IHL), is based on three foundational principles which also conform with the guiding U.S. Department of Defense Laws of War Manual and include: military necessity, distinction, and proportionality.

The principle of necessity requires that a party to an armed conflict may only resort to those measures that are necessary to achieve the legitimate purpose of a conflict, and specifically, to weaken the military capacity of the other parties.

The principle of distinction requires that parties to a conflict must “at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives.”

And lastly, there is perhaps no principle in international law that has been as repeatedly abused as that of “proportionality,” to reflexively castigate Israel and charge it with war crimes every time the pesky Jewish state refuses to surrender and allow its citizens to be slaughtered.

But what is a “proportionate” response to 10,000 rockets being rained down on you? Should Israel have indiscriminately fired 10,000 rockets on central Beirut? Of course not.

First, we need to throw away the notion that proportionality is measured by some kind of perverse equivalence in civilian deaths. It is not. Under IHL, the doctrine of proportionality requires that any expected loss of civilian life must not be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from such an attack.

In relation to Israel’s current military operation, the goal vis-à-vis Hezbollah was clear: to stop their rocket fire, force Hezbollah to withdraw from southern Lebanon and allow Israeli citizens in the north to safely return home, essentially in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1701.

And whilst Israel has, yet again, gone to extraordinary lengths to avoid harm to civilians in Lebanon, while abiding by the principles of distinction and necessity, it is Hezbollah, which just like Hamas, is also committing the double war crime or embedding in civilian areas, cynically using the Lebanese people as human shields, while indiscriminately firing at civilians in Israel. Indeed, Hassan Nasrallah’s bunker and Hezbollah central command was embedded underneath residential buildings in Beirut.

In short, Israel’s operation to eliminate Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and enter into southern Lebanon has been a textbook display of military precision and self-defensive action, in accordance with international humanitarian law.

However, for some critics, it will just never be enough. There are many who claim Israel has the right to self-defense, but yet the moment the Jewish state lawfully exercises that right against someone like Hassan Nasrallah, a man who is the very embodiment of evil, they immediately object to it. Perhaps their issue is not Israel’s right to self-defense, but its very existence.

Opinion: Israel’s elimination of Nasrallah was just and legal under laws of war — National Post

All necessary principles and doctrines were met

apple.news

 

[Serryah]

For the local circle jerking warhawks.

 

[Ron in Regina]

For the local circle jerking warhawks.

Nothing like a good old fashioned Warhawk circle jerk. Like Hamas, Hezbollah also has genocidal intentions to annihilate the Jewish state, with Nasrallah himself having said that that the entire Middle East will not rest until the “cancerous gland” Israel is removed, and on Oct. 8 last year, a day after the Hamas massacre, Hezbollah formally joined the war in the hope that they might repeat an October 7 style attack in the north.

Since then, Hezbollah has fired almost 10,000 rockets at Israel, murdering or killing 48 people, including 12 Druze children who were struck while playing football in the Majdal Shams massacre in July. Meanwhile, almost 100,000 Israelis have been forcibly displaced from their homes in the north as a result of the ongoing attacks.

This week alone, at least 2 million Israelis had to rush to bomb shelter – that’s more than the entire population of Montreal.

Faced with this intolerable situation, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have now also entered Lebanon, in a precise and limited operation, to remove the Hezbollah terror targets and infrastructure from southern Lebanon to allow for the safe return of Israeli citizens back to their homes.

Iran (not a border nation to Israel) has apparently today launched more than 200 ballistic missiles at Israel, with the warning that “if” Israel retaliates for Iran doing this, then Iran will do….this again sooner instead of later or something? Maybe get some of its proxies to shoot rockets & missiles at Israel (like they’re already doing)?

Yet before Nasrallah has even been buried and IDF forces set foot in Lebanon, there has been no shortage of self-proclaimed experts and apologists for terror erroneously charging Israel with violating international law. Now ‘Tag!’ Someone else’s turn.

 

[Ron in Regina]

The Biden Harris (?) administration has vowed that the U.S. will ensure that Iran faces “severe consequences” regardless of how Israel responds, a step U.S. officials have yet to spell out but which some analysts said could mean stepped-up sanctions enforcement.

Yet none of that appears likely to stay Israel’s hand—a point Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu underscored Tuesday when he declared that Iran had “made a big mistake” and “will pay for it.”

Unlike with Iran’s last missile attack, Israel doesn’t need to fear that a strike against Iran would spark a major clash with Hezbollah. Israel’s recent air and ground offensive against Hezbollah, and its outsize missile force, has greatly diminished its capabilities.

Israeli Response to Iran’s Attack to Set Course of Widening War — The Wall Street Journal

The U.S. is hoping for a measured reaction, but it has limited ability to influence its closest Middle East ally

apple.news

 

[Serryah]

Nothing like a good old fashioned Warhawk circle jerk. Like Hamas, Hezbollah also has genocidal intentions to annihilate the Jewish state, with Nasrallah himself having said that that the entire Middle East will not rest until the “cancerous gland” Israel is removed, and on Oct. 8 last year, a day after the Hamas massacre, Hezbollah formally joined the war in the hope that they might repeat an October 7 style attack in the north.

Since then, Hezbollah has fired almost 10,000 rockets at Israel, murdering or killing 48 people, including 12 Druze children who were struck while playing football in the Majdal Shams massacre in July. Meanwhile, almost 100,000 Israelis have been forcibly displaced from their homes in the north as a result of the ongoing attacks.

This week alone, at least 2 million Israelis had to rush to bomb shelter – that’s more than the entire population of Montreal.

Faced with this intolerable situation, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have now also entered Lebanon, in a precise and limited operation, to remove the Hezbollah terror targets and infrastructure from southern Lebanon to allow for the safe return of Israeli citizens back to their homes.

Iran (not a border nation to Israel) has apparently today launched more than 200 ballistic missiles at Israel, with the warning that “if” Israel retaliates for Iran doing this, then Iran will do….this again sooner instead of later or something? Maybe get some of its proxies to shoot rockets & missiles at Israel (like they’re already doing)?

Yet before Nasrallah has even been buried and IDF forces set foot in Lebanon, there has been no shortage of self-proclaimed experts and apologists for terror erroneously charging Israel with violating international law. Now ‘Tag!’ Someone else’s turn.

Case in point.

 

[pgs]

The Biden Harris (?) administration has vowed that the U.S. will ensure that Iran faces “severe consequences” regardless of how Israel responds, a step U.S. officials have yet to spell out but which some analysts said could mean stepped-up sanctions enforcement.

Yet none of that appears likely to stay Israel’s hand—a point Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu underscored Tuesday when he declared that Iran had “made a big mistake” and “will pay for it.”

Unlike with Iran’s last missile attack, Israel doesn’t need to fear that a strike against Iran would spark a major clash with Hezbollah. Israel’s recent air and ground offensive against Hezbollah, and its outsize missile force, has greatly diminished its capabilities.

Israeli Response to Iran’s Attack to Set Course of Widening War — The Wall Street Journal

The U.S. is hoping for a measured reaction, but it has limited ability to influence its closest Middle East ally

apple.news

Israel should send a fleet of bombers over Tehran and demonstrate precision bombing , flatten some military bases .

 

[Ron in Regina]

Israel should send a fleet of bombers over Tehran and demonstrate precision bombing , flatten some military bases .

Leaving civilians alone. I hear you. They have to do something, and it has to be symbolic and significant, and that might be the lesser of all evils. The last time Iran fired a bunch of missiles into Israel, indiscriminately, is real response was to take and target one military base.

 

[petros]

Leaving civilians alone. I hear you. They have to do something, and it has to be symbolic and significant, and that might be the lesser of all evils. The last time Iran fired a bunch of missiles into Israel, indiscriminately, is real response was to take and target one military base.

They wont leave civilians out. Theyre human shields. Iranians have reactors in fheir living rooms.

 

[Ron in Regina]

Israel says eight soldiers killed in clashes with Hezbollah in Lebanon — Reuters

Israel said on Wednesday eight of its soldiers were killed in combat in south Lebanon as its forces thrust into its northern neighbour in a campaign against the Hezbollah armed group.

apple.news

The Israeli military said regular infantry and armoured units were joining its ground operations in Lebanon, a day after Iran fired more than 180 missiles into Israel, a barrage which raised concerns that the oil-producing Middle East could be caught up in a wider conflict.

luckily, in North America, all three countries are oil exporting (net exporter), but domestically, we will each be held to the world price for oil, which will skew depending on what OPEC does in the Middle East, etc…

A 38-year-old Palestinian from Gaza, the only known fatality in Iran's attack on Israel, was buried on Wednesday.

Sameh Khadr Hassan Al-Asali had been staying in a Palestinian security forces compound in the West Bank when he was killed by falling missile debris during Tuesday's attack, which Israel said was largely foiled by its air defence systems.

 

[petros]

This outta help keep Bibi out of prison for a few more months.

Kudos to bombing a Russian airbase in Syria without killing civilians. Ill give the Supremacists that.

Officially WWIII.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

This outta help keep Bibi out of prison for a few more months.

Kudos to bombing a Russian airbase in Syria without killing civilians. Ill give the Supremacists that.

Officially WWIII.

I expected something bigger.

And shorter.

IV, by the way. III was 1938-1945.

 

[Ron in Regina]

With two of Iran’s most powerful proxies—Hezbollah and Hamas—fighting for their lives, Tehran has lost a central pillar of its deterrence strategy, giving Israel an opening to strike what it sees as its most dangerous foe.
On Tuesday, Iran unleashed one of the biggest ballistic-missile barrages in the history of warfare, aimed at targets across Israel. It said it was retaliating for Israel’s killing of the two militant groups’ leaders, Hassan Nasrallah of Hezbollah and Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas.

Iran Exposed to Israeli Counterattack After Blows Against Its Allies — The Wall Street Journal

Tehran has no good options as Israel defangs Iran’s proxies Hezbollah and Hamas

apple.news

Israel has promised a forceful response. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tehran had made “a great error and will pay for it.” When and how Israel will strike back remains unclear, as is the question of whether it would choose to target Tehran’s nuclear program.

Ironically, it was the threat of reprisals by Hezbollah and, to a lesser extent, Hamas, that was supposed to help dissuade Israel from any direct attack on Iran. Now, however, Israel’s success in degrading the two militant organizations, both considered terrorist groups by the U.S., has set the stage for a potentially bigger hit.

“Hezbollah and Hamas are paralyzed temporarily and Iran is exposed,” said former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. “Right now, they’re naked, they don’t have the ability to protect themselves. Israel has the greatest opportunity in 50 years to change the face of the Middle East.”

 

[harrylee]

 

[Ron in Regina]

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said Tuesday’s missile strike successfully targeted Israeli military and intelligence bases and that it was retaliation for recent killings of the leaders of its allies Hamas and Hezbollah.

The Israeli military described the attack as "indiscriminate" and said that while it had been largely thwarted by air defences, there had been casualties and millions of Israelis had been sent running to bomb shelters.

The contrasting reactions laid bare the deep divisions in Iran, where there is widespread discontent at the clerical establishment and frustration over the economic troubles caused by sanctions.

On one side of the debate are those who support the government's actions with nationalist pride, while on the other are those who fear war, economic collapse and further suppression of domestic reform movements.

Missile attack on Israel lays bare deep divisions among Iranians — BBC News

Social media users express a mixture of pride, uncertainty and fear after Iran's strike on Israel.

apple.news

Terry Glavin: Hezbollah's murderous terrorists are a global problem, not just Israel's — National Post

It has been responsible for dozens of terrorist attacks around the world

apple.news

On Tuesday, in the immediate aftermath of Iran’s second direct missile attack on the Jewish state in the past six months, Joly (Trudeau’s minister or something or another) repeated the same, tired talking points that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his ministers have been reciting for months.

“Of course, Israel needs to be able to protect itself,” she said, “and that’s why we’ll continue to support its security.” That “support,” however, doesn’t seem to amount to much beyond giving lip service to Israel’s right to defend itself.

This is, after all, a government that has had a de facto arms embargo in place against Israel since the beginning of the year and is currently trying to prevent ammunition produced in Quebec from being exported to the United States so it won’t end up in Israeli hands. What exactly are the Israelis supposed to defend themselves with — swords?

Having reiterated the mantra about Israel’s right to self-defence, Joly went on to say that, “At the same time, we need to make sure that parties sit down and the war stops.” She also expressed concern that Israel retaliating would lead to “all out war.”

A similar message was issued by Justin Trudeau. On Twitter, he said that, “Canada unequivocally condemns Iran’s reckless attack against Israel” and “fully support(s) Israel’s right to defend itself against this attack.”

It may not have been the clearest example of moral leadership displayed by a Canadian prime minister, but at least we can agree that a sovereign country has a right to protect its citizens from incoming missiles. Of course, Trudeau then repeated his government’s “call for de-escalation across the region.”

Iran is targeting Canadian relatives of Flight 752 victims, RCMP tells foreign interference inquiry — The Globe and Mail

Iran shot down the Ukrainian Airlines flight in January 2020, killing all 176 people on board

apple.news

The Israelis don’t appear to be taking Canada seriously anymore, and I certainly can’t blame them given that we turned our back on our longtime friend and ally in its darkest hour and don’t even have the moral fortitude to defend it against biased United Nations resolutions anymore.

The real takeaway from Iran’s latest attempt to rain hellfire from the skies above Israel should not be that the Iranian mullahs need to be appeased, or that a deal must be reached to prolong an untenable situation that has seen Israel simultaneously defending itself from attacks coming from all sides — Hamas from the west, the Houthi from the south, Hezbollah from the north and Iran from the east.

No, the takeaway must be that the West needs to finally confront the one country that has been arming, training and directing all these terrorist groups — the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Jesse Kline: Sorry Joly, maybe all out war with Iran is exactly what we need — National Post

There are only two things that will stop the genocidal ambitions of Iran’s leaders — regime change or war

apple.news

 

[Ron in Regina]

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly says Israel’s decision to bar United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres from entering the country is “counterproductive.”

Speaking Thursday at the Francophonie summit in Paris, Ms. Joly expressed her full support for the UN leader, one day after her Israeli counterpart said Mr. Guterres’s failure to condemn Iran’s missile attack on Israel earlier this week made him persona non grata.

Iran fired more than 180 ballistic missiles at Israel on Tuesday amid an escalation in fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. After the attack, Mr. Guterres issued a brief statement condemning “the broadening of the Middle East conflict, with escalation after escalation.”

Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz said, “Anyone who cannot unequivocally condemn Iran’s heinous attack on Israel, as nearly all the countries of the world have done, does not deserve to set foot on Israeli soil.”

SHAPIRO: Israel showing the West there's no substitute for victory — Toronto Sun

On Oct. 1, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched some 181 ballistic missiles at the state of Israel. Most were shot down and those that weren’t fell largely in uninhabited areas. Thanks to the technological and intelligence superiority of Israel and her allies, the Iranian attack — the second...

apple.news

Ms. Joly said Israel’s decision was not helpful.

Joly criticizes Israel for barring UN Secretary-General from entering country — The Globe and Mail

The Foreign Affairs Minister expressed her full support for the UN leader, one day after her Israeli counterpart said António Guterres’s failure to condemn Iran’s missile attack made him persona non grata

apple.news

Israel’s decision was not helpful to whom?