Unlike Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden has the decorum to state that a juries decision must be respected. I don’t think that’s Kamala Harris’s position here.
Kyle Rittenhouse
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Kamala & Justin seem very similar, but Kamala doesn’t seem to have a cult following let alone popularity in her own nation.
nationalpost.com
“However, some lawyers are worried that politicians now weighing in on the case are going too far and may even be putting the independence of the country’s judiciary at risk with their comments.”
…& the above statement comes from a nation (unlike the US) where Judges or DA’s or Sheriff’s, etc…are not elected political positions.
Trudeau putting judicial independence at risk with Boushie comments, lawyers say
Criminal lawyer Michael Lacy added that politicians 'have no business at all' in commenting on the outcome of a trial
…& the above statement comes from a nation (unlike the US) where Judges or DA’s or Sheriff’s, etc…are not elected political positions.
Kamala & Justin seem very similar, but Kamala doesn’t seem to have a cult following let alone popularity in her own nation.
“However, some lawyers are worried that politicians now weighing in on the case are going too far and may even be putting the independence of the country’s judiciary at risk with their comments.”Trudeau putting judicial independence at risk with Boushie comments, lawyers say
Criminal lawyer Michael Lacy added that politicians 'have no business at all' in commenting on the outcome of a trial
…& the above statement comes from a nation (unlike the US) where Judges or DA’s or Sheriff’s, etc…are not elected political positions.
Politicians absolutely have a business commenting on trials. Whether local or federal, it's going to happen because it's 'of the public interest', and people will wonder what side that person would have taken in the case. As if it'd help give insight to the character of that politician.
If people use said comments to make excuses for X reaction, that's on the idiots who do so, not the politician.
Or...
That's what some would have society believe (mostly the right, unless it goes against right narratives).
Personally, I can see the good and bad of it and overall, politically speaking, you're opening yourself up to a clusterfuck of issues if you go beyond a middle road narrative.
Biden's message, for example, was typical. "I feel different but the jury has spoken, we've offered to help" and that's it.
Harris, if she took it beyond that middle road, is risking a lot by doing so.
That being said, she's also a citizen and has a right to her own opinions and voicing that; free speech and all.
In case anyone is noticing,
The United States of America is now in a Constitutional Crisis.
The Executive Branch of Government is ignoring the the rulings of the Judiciary Branch.
The DOJ now wants to go after Kyle..
www.fox13news.com
The United States of America is now in a Constitutional Crisis.
The Executive Branch of Government is ignoring the the rulings of the Judiciary Branch.
The DOJ now wants to go after Kyle..
Can Kyle Rittenhouse face federal charges? House judiciary chairman calls for DOJ review
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has called for a federal review following a jury’s acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse in the fatal shooting of two men and wounding of a third during a night of protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin in August 2020.
What they need in the USA is for the people to grow a set and get rid of s few in the Democrat Party .. like 6 feet under
Yup let’s let the politicians , pundits and twitterverse to determine quilt or innocence , that outa work .
In case anyone is noticing,
The United States of America is now in a Constitutional Crisis.
The Executive Branch of Government is ignoring the the rulings of the Judiciary Branch.
The DOJ now wants to go after Kyle..
Can Kyle Rittenhouse face federal charges? House judiciary chairman calls for DOJ review
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., has called for a federal review following a jury’s acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse in the fatal shooting of two men and wounding of a third during a night of protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin in August 2020.
Considering the fuckery that went on during this trial, I'm not shocked. You shouldn't be either.
I did see a comment elsewhere about how since widdle Kyle crossed state lines that he could be charged under feral law but I doubt that's a thing. If it was possible it would have happened from the get go.
I'm happy over a different trial with a different verdict that I wasn't really aware of. The bastard in that situation got what he deserved.
Sometimes Justice does work.
He didn’t cross state lines with a firearm..
Rittenhouse Testified He Drove Himself to Kenosha Without Weapon - FactCheck.org
Kyle Rittenhouse, who is on trial for murder, testified in court that he drove himself from his home in Antioch, Illinois, to Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Aug. 24, 2020, the day before he shot and killed two men at a protest that became violent. The weapon he used, according to testimony, had been...
www.factcheck.org
He didn’t cross state lines with a firearm..
Rittenhouse Testified He Drove Himself to Kenosha Without Weapon - FactCheck.org
Kyle Rittenhouse, who is on trial for murder, testified in court that he drove himself from his home in Antioch, Illinois, to Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Aug. 24, 2020, the day before he shot and killed two men at a protest that became violent. The weapon he used, according to testimony, had been...
Yes, I know that. That's why I am of the opinion that the idea of a Federal case is a nogo. I know the person who made the point thought because he crossed state lines, regardless of where the gun was, he should be still federally charged. But IMO that won't work so...
The "fuckery" was by the prosecution, that was shown in court. Lying, withholding evidence, just for a start.
Remember this kid?
Remember this kid?
OK. . .
Happy birthday you fuck
Happy birthday you fuck
I hate birthdays
I hate cake
(Number) years ago
YOUR PARENTS MADE A BIG MISTAKE!
Just out of curiosity, where'd you get the $250 million figure?The "fuckery" was by the prosecution, that was shown in court. Lying, withholding evidence, just for a start.
Remember this kid?
But Arbery moved toward them! He probably reached for his waistband, or took a fighting stance!
And he was a "star football player," a group known for physical skills and violence! And he was no angel, y'know.
Clear-cut case of self defense. So obvious the cops let them go and the DA declined to prosecute. Shouldn't we trust the judgment of these fine professionals?
Last edited:
Maybe the Jury wasn't too impressed with the prosecutor when in a big show he pointed the rifle at the jury...
With his finger on the trigger!
With his finger on the trigger!
Last edited:
Reporter: Rittenhouse Jurors Overheard Commenting on Stress Deliberating Case: “Media Coverage Is Insane”
By Kristinn TaylorPublished November 19, 2021 at 10:37am
496 Comments