Steven Hawking's Tutor
Posts: 4,995 
Location: Florida, Hurricane Central
Location: Florida, Hurricane Central
February 22nd, 2008, 09:42 PM
Some more points on the supposed "demolition" of the WTC (which I have pilfered from elsewhere)
-------------->
The proposed demolition of the WTC would have required the placement of thousands of explosive charges. Since none were found in the rubble, we can conclude that they detonated with 100% reliability. Given that they were allegedly placed in a hurried fashion (over a weekend according to the "power-down" claims) and that airliners were then flown into the Towers and one of the towers subsequently fell on WTC7, how likely is that? Not one charge had its wiring dislodged, or was knocked out of place, or just didn't go off for whatever reason?
-------------->
To wire WTC7 for a demolition, these magical explosives would have had to:
Some more points on the supposed "demolition" of the WTC (which I have pilfered from elsewhere)
-------------->
The proposed demolition of the WTC would have required the placement of thousands of explosive charges. Since none were found in the rubble, we can conclude that they detonated with 100% reliability. Given that they were allegedly placed in a hurried fashion (over a weekend according to the "power-down" claims) and that airliners were then flown into the Towers and one of the towers subsequently fell on WTC7, how likely is that? Not one charge had its wiring dislodged, or was knocked out of place, or just didn't go off for whatever reason?
-------------->
To wire WTC7 for a demolition, these magical explosives would have had to:
- Have evaded bomb sniffing dogs upon entry into the building.
- Have been powerful enough to slice a column without actually being placed on the column. That or walls and entire offices would have had to have been removed in order to place them directly on the columns.
- Have been quiet enough to be missed by seismic detectors and audio equipment nearby.
- Have survived another building impacting onto them without severing det cord or prematurely exploding charges.
- Have survived 6-7 hours of building-wide fires.
- Have been detonated without any external visual signs.
- Have been undetected by staff and occupants of the building.
- Have been placed without the knowledge staff and occupants in the building.
- Have been placed by someone who were willing to keep their mouth shut over what they did, despite being involved in an event that killed 3,000 people.
House Member
Posts: 3,401
Location: USA
Location: USA
February 25th, 2008, 09:39 AM
The detonation cords were "falling building" and fire proof. Special CIA det cords. The explosives were also fire and heat resistant explosives...real high speed CIA stuff.
And yes...everyone kept their mouths shut and nobody said a word about the CIA "black ops" placing explosives all over the building.
The CIA and FBI under Bush's orders did it and that is that. End of discussion. End of debate. Admit your failings and come to the side of conspiracist. If you do not you are all retards, sheep, idiots. We are the way.
Quoting Toro
They weren't bomb sniffing dogs. They were regular house pets and the dog handling feds were all in on it.
Some more points on the supposed "demolition" of the WTC (which I have pilfered from elsewhere)
-------------->
The proposed demolition of the WTC would have required the placement of thousands of explosive charges. Since none were found in the rubble, we can conclude that they detonated with 100% reliability. Given that they were allegedly placed in a hurried fashion (over a weekend according to the "power-down" claims) and that airliners were then flown into the Towers and one of the towers subsequently fell on WTC7, how likely is that? Not one charge had its wiring dislodged, or was knocked out of place, or just didn't go off for whatever reason?
-------------->
To wire WTC7 for a demolition, these magical explosives would have had to:
-------------->
The proposed demolition of the WTC would have required the placement of thousands of explosive charges. Since none were found in the rubble, we can conclude that they detonated with 100% reliability. Given that they were allegedly placed in a hurried fashion (over a weekend according to the "power-down" claims) and that airliners were then flown into the Towers and one of the towers subsequently fell on WTC7, how likely is that? Not one charge had its wiring dislodged, or was knocked out of place, or just didn't go off for whatever reason?
-------------->
To wire WTC7 for a demolition, these magical explosives would have had to:
- Have evaded bomb sniffing dogs upon entry into the building.
- Have been powerful enough to slice a column without actually being placed on the column. That or walls and entire offices would have had to have been removed in order to place them directly on the columns.
- Have been quiet enough to be missed by seismic detectors and audio equipment nearby.
- Have survived another building impacting onto them without severing det cord or prematurely exploding charges.
- Have survived 6-7 hours of building-wide fires.
- Have been detonated without any external visual signs.
- Have been undetected by staff and occupants of the building.
- Have been placed without the knowledge staff and occupants in the building.
- Have been placed by someone who were willing to keep their mouth shut over what they did, despite being involved in an event that killed 3,000 people.
The detonation cords were "falling building" and fire proof. Special CIA det cords. The explosives were also fire and heat resistant explosives...real high speed CIA stuff.
And yes...everyone kept their mouths shut and nobody said a word about the CIA "black ops" placing explosives all over the building.
The CIA and FBI under Bush's orders did it and that is that. End of discussion. End of debate. Admit your failings and come to the side of conspiracist. If you do not you are all retards, sheep, idiots. We are the way.
Senate Member
Posts: 5,588
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
February 25th, 2008, 11:41 AM
Quoting EagleSmack
I'm glad you cleared that up for us....THANKS! They weren't bomb sniffing dogs. They were regular house pets and the dog handling feds were all in on it.
The detonation cords were "falling building" and fire proof. Special CIA det cords. The explosives were also fire and heat resistant explosives...real high speed CIA stuff.
And yes...everyone kept their mouths shut and nobody said a word about the CIA "black ops" placing explosives all over the building.
The CIA and FBI under Bush's orders did it and that is that. End of discussion. End of debate. Admit your failings and come to the side of conspiracist. If you do not you are all retards, sheep, idiots. We are the way.
The detonation cords were "falling building" and fire proof. Special CIA det cords. The explosives were also fire and heat resistant explosives...real high speed CIA stuff.
And yes...everyone kept their mouths shut and nobody said a word about the CIA "black ops" placing explosives all over the building.
The CIA and FBI under Bush's orders did it and that is that. End of discussion. End of debate. Admit your failings and come to the side of conspiracist. If you do not you are all retards, sheep, idiots. We are the way.
