Muslims Leave U.S. says AlQaeda Warning

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52018

Sunday, September 17, 2006 Today's Edition
GLOBAL INSECURITY
Al-Qaida warning: Muslims leave U.S.

Afghan terror commander hints at big attack on N.Y., Washington
Posted: September 17, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
Adnan el-Shukrijumah

The new al-Qaida field commander in Afghanistan is calling for Muslims to leave the U.S. – particularly Washington and New York – in anticipation of a major terror attack to rival Sept. 11, according to an interview by a Pakistani journalist.

Abu Dawood told Hamid Mir, a reporter who has covered al-Qaida and met with Osama bin Laden, the attack is being coordinated by Adnan el-Shukrijumah and suggests it may involve some form of weapon of mass destruction smuggled across the Mexican border.

"Our brothers are ready to attack inside America. We will breach their security again," he is quoted as saying. "There is no timeframe for our attack inside America; we can do it any time."

As WND has previously reported, el-Shukrijumah is a trained nuclear technician and accomplished pilot who has been singled out by bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri to serve as the field commander for the next terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

The terrorist was last seen in Mexico, where, on Nov. 1, 2004, he allegedly hijacked a Piper PA Pawnee cropduster from Ejido Queretaro near Mexicali to transport a nuclear weapon and nuclear equipment into the U.S., according to Paul Williams, a former FBI consultant and author of "The Dunces of Doomsday."

"He is an American and a friend of Muhammad Atta, who led 9/11 attacks five years ago," said Dawood. "We call him 'Jaffer al Tayyar' (Jafer the Pilot); he is very brave and intelligent. (President) Bush is aware that brother Adnan has smuggled deadly materials inside America from the Mexican border. Bush is silent about him, because he doesn’t want to panic his people. Sheikh Osama bin Laden has completed his cycle of warnings. You know, he is man of his words, he is not a politician; he always does what he says. If he said it many times that Americans will see new attacks, they will definitely see new attacks. He is a real mujahid. Americans will not win this war, which they have started against Muslims. Americans are the biggest supporters of the biggest terrorist in the world, which is Israel."

Dawood said he was currently conducting operations in Afghanistan under the leadership of the Taliban. He warned of a series of upcoming suicide bombings there directed against government and coalition forces during Ramadan.

He is also quoted as saying the next attack in America will not be conducted by people like Atta.

"We have a different plan for the next attack," he told Mir. "You will see. Americans will hardly find out any Muslim names, after the next attack. Most of our brothers are living in Western countries, with Jewish and Christian names, with passports of Western countries. This time, someone with the name of Mohamed Atta will not attack inside America, it would be some David, Richard or Peter."

He said there will be another audio message from bin Laden aired within the next two weeks.

Mir reportedly interviewed Dawood Sept. 12 at the tomb of Sultan Mehmud Ghaznawi on the outskirts of Kabul. Dawood and the al-Qaida leaders who accompanied him were clean-shaven and dressed as Western reporters. The al-Qaida commander had contacted Mir by cell phone to arrange the meeting.

"You have witnessed the brutality of the Israelis in the recent 34-day war against Lebanese civilians," said Dawood. "9/11 was a revenge of Palestinian children, killed by the U.S.-made weapons, supplied to Israel. The next attack on America would be a revenge of Lebanese children killed by U.S.-made cluster bombs. Bush and (British Prime Minister Tony) Blair are the Crusaders, and Muslim leaders, like (Pakistani President Pervez) Musharraf and (Afghani President Hamid) Karzai are their collaborators. We will teach a lesson to all of them."

El-Shukrijumah was born in Guyana Aug. 4, 1975 – the firstborn of Gulshair el-Shukrijumah, a 44-year-old radical Muslim cleric, and his 16-year-old wife. In 1985, Gulshair migrated to the United States, where he assumed duties as the imam of the Farouq Mosque in Brooklyn.

The mosque, located at 554 Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, has served as a hive for terrorist activities. It has raised millions for the jihad and has served as a recruiting station for al-Qaida. Many of the planners of the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, including blind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, were prominent members of this notorious "house of worship."

In 1995, the Shukrijumah family relocated to Miramar, Fla., where Gulshair became the spiritual leader of the radical Masjid al-Hijah Mosque, and where Adnan became friends with Jose Padilla, who planned to detonate a radiological bomb in midtown Manhattan; Mandhai Jokhan, who was convicted of attempting to blow up nuclear power plants in southern Florida; and a group of other home-grown terrorists.

Adnan Shukrijumah attended flight schools in Florida and Norman, Oklahoma, along with Mohammad Atta and the other 9/11 operatives, and he became a highly skilled commercial jet pilot, although he, like Atta and the other terrorists, never applied for a license with the Federal Aviation Commission.

In April 2001, Shukrijumah spent 10 days in Panama, where he reportedly met with al-Qaida officials to assist in the planning of 9/11. He also traveled to Trinidad and Guyana, where virulent al-Qaida cells have been established. The following month, he obtained an associate's degree in computer engineering from Broward Community College.

During this time, he managed to get passports from Guyana, Trinidad, Saudi Arabia, Canada and the United States, according to Williams. He also began to adopt a number of aliases, including Abu Arifi, Jafar al-Tayyar, Jaafar At Yayyar, Ja'far al-Tayar, and Mohammed Sher Mohammed Khan (the name that appeared on his official FBI file). He traveled to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, where he met with Ramzi Binalshibh, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and other members of the al-Qaida high command. He also spent considerable time within al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan, where he received training in explosives and special operations.

Following 9/11, el-Shukrijumah was reportedly singled out by bin Laden and al-Zawahiri to spearhead the next great attack on America. One plan was for a nuclear attack that would take place simultaneously in seven U.S. cities, leaving millions dead and the richest and most powerful nation on earth in ashes.

"Muslims should leave America," said Dawood. "We cannot stop our attack just because of the American Muslims; they must realize that American forces are killing innocent Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq; we have the right to respond back, in the same manner, in the enemy's homeland. The American Muslims are like a human shield for our enemy; they must leave New York and Washington."

Mir, the journalist, has reported previously that al-Qaida has smuggled nuclear weapons and uranium into the U.S.

"I am saying that Muslims must leave America, but we can attack America anytime," he said. "Our cycle of warnings has been completed, now we have fresh edicts from some prominent Muslim scholars to destroy our enemy, this is our defending of Jihad; the enemy has entered in our homes and we have the right to enter in their homes, they are killing us, we will kill them."

Why am I reminded of old bad Saturday afternoon movies when I read of the "proclamations" from these boogeymen?
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Muslims Leave U.S. says AlQaeda Warning

Well that's just great, if my Palestinian barber leaves I'm screwed. He's such a nice guy and cuts my hair exactly the way I want it!
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
So, if the Islamists smuggle a nuclear, biological, or chemical device into the United States and kill say.......100,000 people, where should the USA fire it's nukes?

Tehran?

Damascus?

Rhiyad?

Pakistan?

I personally vote for the north of Pakistan, get some of them Islamist schools of hate, and a few Taliban as a sort of bonus.

Just for starters, anyway.

They could follow up with Damascus and Tehran, just to get the point across.

And as long as they're launching, how about them looneys in North Korea?

Edited to say:

Tongue firmly in cheek.

Some folks on this forum would have thought Johnathan Swift really wanted to eat Irish children.
:roll:
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Colpy

Could you kill millions of people as easily as you talk about it?

I keep reading about missing Russian suitcase nukes. I would say the Russians should be responsible but obviously we couldn't retaliate against Russia.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
#juan said:
Colpy

Could you kill millions of people as easily as you talk about it?

I keep reading about missing Russian suitcase nukes. I would say the Russians should be responsible but obviously we couldn't retaliate against Russia.

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Tongue in cheek.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Some folks on this forum think that Jonathan Swift actually ate Irish children.

A Modest Proposal



For Preventing The Children of Poor People in Ireland
From Being Aburden to Their Parents or Country, and
For Making Them Beneficial to The Public


By Jonathan Swift (1729)




It is a melancholy object to those who walk through this great town or travel in the country, when they see the streets, the roads, and cabin doors, crowded with beggars of the female sex, followed by three, four, or six children, all in rags and importuning every passenger for an alms. These mothers, instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants: who as they grow up either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native country to fight for the Pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to the Barbadoes.

I think it is agreed by all parties that this prodigious number of children in the arms, or on the backs, or at the heels of their mothers, and frequently


A Modest Proposal
 

EastSideScotian

Stuck in Ontario...bah
Jun 9, 2006
706
3
18
38
Petawawa Ontario
Iteresting that we speak of this, I just Read aninteresting Artical about the New Times Mag thats out on the Sheleves. I might pick up a copy

It goes over what a war with Iran would be like
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/17/coverstory.tm.iran.tm/index.html

Worth a read, Iam sure with int he next 3 years we willl be involved in something like that.

Where do you guys think our Great Nation would ba standing in that sorta of mess, pre suitcase nuke attacks on the USA. What would you feel we should do, truely we would have to do something.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Our world most certainly changed after 9/11, but if some terrorist set off a suitcase nuke in say, New York, the world would never be the same again. The U.S. would retaliate, but I don't know what form it might take. Muslims in general would be ostracized the world over. Any who might want to celebrate a victory would only have hours to enjoy it.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Maybe the ones we should be ostracizing right now are those nations who are making it difficult to provide a united front against Iranian nuclear aspirations. China and Russia. If Iran is allowed to go ahead with its plans and mischief does result, anyone with a grade five or higher education that can't finger these culprits as having their spoons in the pot should be shot. Our problem is not Iran. It's the big guys who support it.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
You know, I'm not too worried about Iran. They are a wealthy country and have too much to lose. It would take Iran another ten years to build a nuclear device that could be delivered by anything but a truck. I am more worried about some splinter group like El quiade getting hold of one of the "missing" nukes. They are driven by God, right? Just like the suicide bombers.
 

EastSideScotian

Stuck in Ontario...bah
Jun 9, 2006
706
3
18
38
Petawawa Ontario
#juan said:
You know, I'm not too worried about Iran. They are a wealthy country and have too much to lose. It would take Iran another ten years to build a nuclear device that could be delivered by anything but a truck. I am more worried about some splinter group like El quiade getting hold of one of the "missing" nukes. They are driven by God, right? Just like the suicide bombers.
To say the Current government of Iran, is anything else than a God Driven Nation, is a pretty scarcastic joke to give there Juan, you always give me a good laugh.

Iran has someone they call the supreme iatola (spelt diferantly ;)) They love him, infact most follow him, and he even has the Presidents will. Iteresting no? Infact with the current popularity of the current Iranian Government and The support for the Iatola (remember the spirtual fundamenlist leader) are so high, we cant use the exuse that the government mistreats the its population, because they love the current Political set up.

Sheit Nations are usally verry Fundamnetal to Islamic Belif, being the more conservitive of the 2 septs of muslims. Sunnis are more reformed and slightly more secular, and passive.

Run by God, for sure. but yes we should worry about terrorist gropus too, valid point.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Never mind the little atempted put downs Scotian. I've read that a lot of Iranians have had enough of the Imams. This guy might be popular but most people can see that building a couple bombs to some how use against the U.S. would be folly since the immediate retaliation would destroy the country. The Iranian President talks big but he's probably not stupid enough to take on the U.S.
 

EastSideScotian

Stuck in Ontario...bah
Jun 9, 2006
706
3
18
38
Petawawa Ontario
#juan said:
Never mind the little atempted put downs Scotian. I've read that a lot of Iranians have had enough of the Imams. This guy might be popular but most people can see that building a couple bombs to some how use against the U.S. would be folly since the immediate retaliation would destroy the country. The Iranian President talks big but he's probably not stupid enough to take on the U.S.
why alsot of americans support the usa having nukes....whats your point.

Its nto a put down, You justr dont know what your talking about, like most peole who think they are liberals.
 

neone

New Member
Jul 15, 2006
32
0
6
Vancouver
Thanks to a poster on another board regarding the site that story comes from -

Douglas J. Hagmann, the founder of the website is a regular guest on Art Bell's radio show....

Before 9/11 he was the chief investigator in the Ohio area looking for BigFoot.
 

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
EastSideScotian said:
Iran has someone they call the supreme iatola (spelt diferantly ;)) They love him, infact most follow him, and he even has the Presidents will. Iteresting no? Infact with the current popularity of the current Iranian Government and The support for the Iatola (remember the spirtual fundamenlist leader) are so high, we cant use the exuse that the government mistreats the its population, because they love the current Political set up.

I'm not sure that the ayatollah is so popular in Iran. Before 2005, the reform movement was quite big in Iran, getting close to 80% of the vote. I'm not quite sure what happened in the 2005 election, or why they went for such a conservative president. Khatami

Sheit Nations are usally verry Fundamnetal to Islamic Belif, being the more conservitive of the 2 septs of muslims. Sunnis are more reformed and slightly more secular, and passive.

Except for bin laden....
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
45
Newfoundland!
RE: Muslims Leave U.S. sa

question is will the world be sterilised by nuclear holocaust before or after the expected end of our (those alive today) lives?

will it be us, our children, or our childrens children who deal with the next bout of nuclear whoopsiedaisies?

I strongly feel that a bomb will be detonated again and the shock will be the same as when the last two went. then it'll be a few more decades before people can brew up enough hate to do it again
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Re: RE: Muslims Leave U.S. sa

hermanntrude said:
question is will the world be sterilised by nuclear holocaust before or after the expected end of our (those alive today) lives?

will it be us, our children, or our childrens children who deal with the next bout of nuclear whoopsiedaisies?

Ha! So those of us without children have nothing to lose :wink: Neener neener! :booty:

Seriously, I don't see terrorism provoking the US to use nuclear weapons. Terrorists would obviously like to use them, hopefully they never get the chance.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Re: RE: Muslims Leave U.S. says AlQaeda Warning

Colpy said:
So, if the Islamists smuggle a nuclear, biological, or chemical device into the United States and kill say.......100,000 people, where should the USA fire it's nukes?

Tehran?

Damascus?

Rhiyad?

Pakistan?

I personally vote for the north of Pakistan, get some of them Islamist schools of hate, and a few Taliban as a sort of bonus.

Just for starters, anyway.

They could follow up with Damascus and Tehran, just to get the point across.

And as long as they're launching, how about them looneys in North Korea?

Edited to say:

Tongue firmly in cheek.

Some folks on this forum would have thought Johnathan Swift really wanted to eat Irish children.
:roll:



The last biological attack in United states, which was the anthrax, was from a military lab, working for the governement in other word, an inside job enough said.