Trump points to Canada as a model for U.S. immigration reform in Congress speech

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
:lol:

Trump points to Canada as a model for U.S. immigration reform in Congress speech

Donald Trump is calling for sweeping immigration reform with a “merit-based” method for allowing people into the U.S. – and citing Canada’s points system as a model.

In his first speech to a joint session of Congress, Mr. Trump tried to strike a more restrained and presidential tone, mixing a reiteration of his protectionist campaign rhetoric with calls for unity and a few policies that could find support among his political rivals.

He also pivoted towards a larger vision for immigration, arguing that the U.S. should adopt a new system that prioritizes people with the greatest chance of succeeding economically. The President offered few details on how exactly this proposed system would work, but cited both Canada and Australia as examples to follow.

“Nations around the world, like Canada, Australia and many others – have a merit-based immigration system. It is a basic principle that those seeking to enter a country ought to be able to support themselves financially,” he said. “Yet, in America, we do not enforce this rule, straining the very public resources that our poorest citizens rely upon.”

Under Canada’s points system, immigrants are evaluated by their skills, work experience, education and language skills, a system designed to bring the best and brightest into the country.

Before the address, Mr. Trump told journalists that he was willing to bring in new immigration rules that would allow some undocumented immigrants who had not committed serious crimes to receive legal status, including the ability to work and pay taxes. Mr. Trump said he would agree to such reforms if his legislative adversaries would agree to unspecified “compromise.”

In the speech, the President also pointed to the U.S.-Canadian women’s entrepreneur council that he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau created earlier this month as one of his early achievements in office. The shout-out drew applause from even his political rivals, including some halting clapping from Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren.

“With the help of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, we have formed a Council with our neighbors in Canada to help ensure that women entrepreneurs have access to the networks, markets and capital they need to start a business and live out their financial dreams,” he said.

Trump points to Canada as a model for U.S. immigration reform in Congress speech - The Globe and Mail
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
That's quite an exaggeration. We listened to the whole speech. Trump referred to Canada along with Australia and 'other countries' with regard to the vetting process..
He mentioned that with the help of Canada's P.M. he has initiated promotion programs for professional women.
That's all. Let's not try to make it all about us.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
An exaggeration is when you take an idea and expand the concept beyond it's original intent.

That didn't happen here.

It's not an exaggeration.

Trump was genuinely giddy to talk about our immigration policy.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
An exaggeration is when you take an idea and expand the concept beyond it's original intent.

That didn't happen here.

It's not an exaggeration.

Trump was genuinely giddy to talk about our immigration policy.

He's pretty giddy about our health care system, too.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
That's quite an exaggeration. We listened to the whole speech. Trump referred to Canada along with Australia and 'other countries' with regard to the vetting process..
He mentioned that with the help of Canada's P.M. he has initiated promotion programs for professional women.
That's all. Let's not try to make it all about us.

of course it is, but it's the boy's shiny version of what he thinks he reads or hears.

points is good. vetting is good.

queue-jumping, migrants for migrants sake, partisan spite and political points is retarded and obvious. dangerous even.

but anyway.

cucks gonna cuck

:lol:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
So what are Trumpites gonna do now? We've been hearing nonstop snifflies when it comes to Trudeau and Canada's immigration. Now that their leader likes it, will they embrace Trudeau (they already secretly like his economic tax and spend policies)? Will the realize Trump isn't what they voted for, sniffle some more, then crawl back under their rock. Will their heads simply explode? It just keeps getting more interesting.

It was nice to see Loc (on another thread) finally accept that Trump's presidency as been a gong show
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
So what are Trumpites gonna do now? We've been hearing nonstop snifflies when it comes to Trudeau and Canada's immigration. Now that their leader likes it, will they embrace Trudeau (they already secretly like his economic tax and spend policies)? Will the realize Trump isn't what they voted for, sniffle some more, then crawl back under their rock. Will their heads simply explode? It just keeps getting more interesting.

It was nice to see Loc (on another thread) finally accept that Trump's presidency as been a gong show

Tax and spend? More like borrow and spend which is even worse.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
He's just giving Eaglesmack what he voted for. :lol:

I have said more than once that your immigration policy is far tougher than the U.S's. In fact your immigration policy were adopted here it would be called racist. :lol:
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,607
5,250
113
Olympus Mons
“Nations around the world, like Canada, Australia and many others – have a merit-based immigration system. It is a basic principle that those seeking to enter a country ought to be able to support themselves financially,” he said. “Yet, in America, we do not enforce this rule, straining the very public resources that our poorest citizens rely upon.”
Clearly, this rule is NOT enforced in Canada either. Approximately 50% of the working age migrants that come here are unemployable, either because of language barriers, lack of any employment skills or both.
But the biggest insult is to those who are told that they are fully qualified to work in Canada if they come here, only to be told their qualifications aren't up to snuff after they've spent the time and money to come here.

Before the days when mass immigration began in the 90's, we were more selective about who could emigrate here. There really was a merit point system in place to make sure that newcomers would be a good fit for Canada and vice versa. And you know what? We still had immigration from places like the Middle East, China, India, the Philippines etc. Actually, the only thing that has really changed demographically is the volume of people coming from all the same countries we've always had immigration from. That and the fact that prior to the 60's there was no welfare state in Canada so anybody coming over had to bloody well make it on their own merits.

Look, it really is this simple. A welfare state + mass immigration = disaster. Particularly when you're accepting people at the suicidal rate of 1% of the total population/annum. Some years even more.
Immigration rates need to be tied to real employment rates, not simply based on some arbitrary number.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Trump must have been informed that his plan will/has caused a huge brain drain.

Academia will stop seeking employment and education in the US if they fear problems like this poor gentleman suffered.

French Holocaust historian Henry Rousso says US 'no longer quite the US' after being held for 10 hours at immigration

When the immigration officer discovered he would be receiving a fee for his keynote address at Texas A&M University, he ordered him to be deported, claiming he should have a working visa rather than a tourist visa.

“I told him I don’t need one, that the university took care of the formalities, as always, and especially, that I have been doing this for more than 30 years without any problem,” Mr Rousso explained
French Holocaust historian Henry Rousso says US 'no longer quite the US' after being held for 10 hours at immigration | The Independent
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,607
5,250
113
Olympus Mons
“I told him I don’t need one, that the university took care of the formalities, as always, and especially, that I have been doing this for more than 30 years without any problem,” Mr Rousso explained
French Holocaust historian Henry Rousso says US 'no longer quite the US' after being held for 10 hours at immigration | The Independent.
You know how many variations of that story I've heard all around the world? If the university had indeed taken care of the formalities, then US Customs would have been able to verify quite easily that he was in fact entering the country on the correct visa. If he showed up with a tourist visa to do something he's getting paid to do in the US, then he tried to enter with the wrong visa, period.