First round of Hillary Clinton State Department emails released

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
First round of Hillary Clinton State Department emails released



Washington (CNN)The State Department released Friday its first round of emails from Hillary Clinton's time as Secretary of State, offering a new look at her handling of the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

The roughly 300 emails, about 850 pages, are part of the 30,000 that she turned over to State from her private email server, which she used almost exclusively to conduct both private and public business during her time at State.

"The emails we release today do not change the essential facts or our understanding of the events before, during, or after the attacks," the State Department tweeted shortly after the announcement.

Facing considerable backlash and deep skepticism over her use of a private server as she makes her second bid for the White House, Clinton asked State to make her emails public this past March, and repeated her public push to have them released on the campaign trail this week.

The State Department initially planned to release them in January 2016, but a federal judge ruled this week that there should be a "rolling production" of the emails, and they must be disclosed publicly in batches before then. Clinton called for State to expedite their release this week in Iowa, saying "nobody has a bigger interest in getting [the emails] released than I do."

A congressional panel investigating the Benghazi attacks, meanwhile, has had the emails related to Benghazi and Libya since February.

Details of Clinton's email habits that have trickled out over the past few months suggest she used email sparingly, mostly for logistics and to forward information to aides. She's said previously that she was careful to never use email to exchange classified information, and the initial batch isn't expected to show otherwise — the highest classification of messages was "sensitive but unclassified."

On Thursday, the New York Times published a portion of the emails relating to Benghazi, which include a handful from controversial Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal tipping Clinton off to volatile conditions on the ground in Libya, including one blaming the Benghazi attacks on an anti-Muslim video, which he later walked back.

The top Democrat on the Benghazi committee released a statement praising the State Department's decision to release all of the emails pertaining to the attacks at once and said they would vindicate Democrats' assertion that Clinton did nothing inappropriate in her response.

"Instead of the selective leaking that has happened so far, the American people can now read all of these emails and see for themselves that they contain no evidence to back up claims that Secretary Clinton ordered a stand-down, approved an illicit weapons program, or any other wild allegation Republicans have made for years," Rep. Elijah Cummings said in the statement.

He added: "The Select Committee should schedule Secretary Clinton's public testimony now and stop wasting taxpayer money dragging out this political charade to harm Secretary Clinton's bid for president."

But panel chairman Trey Gowdy vehemently disagreed, characterizing the emails released as providing a selective and incomplete picture because a team of attorneys working for Clinton chose which ones to send to State, and saying "unresolved questions" still remain about Benghazi.

"We will not reach any investigative conclusions until our work is complete, but these emails continue to reinforce the fact that unresolved questions and issues remain as it relates to Benghazi," he said.

Gowdy said that to get a full picture, Clinton should turn over her servers to a "a neutral, detached, independent third party for review."

"The Committee's interest is in building a complete record from which the final, definitive accounting regarding the terrorist attacks in Benghazi can be provided. The best way to answer all questions related to the attacks in Benghazi continues to be having access to the full public record, not a "record" controlled, possessed and screened exclusively by Secretary Clinton's personal lawyers."



source: Hillary Clinton emails released from State Department - CNNPolitics.com
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
We will likely find out this whole thing is little more than a tempest in a teapot.
Besides only politico's and their friends even care. People are more interested
in keeping medicare so hardly won and the Republicans want to take away
from people. People care about education, and jobs and the stuff that directly
effects them. If this is all the Republicans have I feel sorry for them
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
How is it possible to learn lessons for the future if past mistakes are not examined based on a complete review of all facts that led to those mistakes? Because of the delay of the State Dept. and Hillary Clinton in releasing information, and Hillary's destruction of her unlawful private server used for official business, the formation of conclusions about Benghazi will be delayed into 2016. The delay is Hillary's own fault.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
She still won't release the 30,000 she destroyed because she said that were private and we know the Clintons never lie.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,651
6,989
113
B.C.
We will likely find out this whole thing is little more than a tempest in a teapot.
Besides only politico's and their friends even care. People are more interested
in keeping medicare so hardly won and the Republicans want to take away
from people. People care about education, and jobs and the stuff that directly
effects them. If this is all the Republicans have I feel sorry for them
If Hillary Clinton is all the Democrats have to offer after all her lies and stonewalling . Filling her pockets in the name of charity .
Perjuring herself during Watergate .
You should wake up to reality she is not a nice person and is a terrible candidate .