61% of Americans agree with Obama on Keystone XL

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
U.S. support for Keystone XL pipeline is softening, new poll suggests

CALGARY – As senators in Washington D.C. prepare to vote Tuesday on “Buy America” and “no export” amendments for a bill that would approve TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone XL pipeline, support for the much-debated oilsands line may not be as widespread and deeply felt as previously thought, accordingly to the results of a new poll.

With Keystone XL court win in Nebraska, Obama is now losing the process battle


U.S. President Barack Obama, who wants process to run its course in the review of Keystone XL, can’t be pleased with the Nebraska court decision that removes one of the last known obstacles to the project

Read more
Keystone XL, an $8-billion pipeline that would expand Calgary-based TransCanada Corp.’s capacity to deliver oil from Alberta to the Gulf Coast of the United States by 830,000 barrels per day, has been the subject of heated debate in the U.S. capital since the Republican-dominated 114th Congress convened this month.

Republicans vowed to make a bill that would force President Barack Obama to approve Keystone XL their first order of business in Congress, saying that support for the pipeline is widespread.

However, a poll published Monday for The Washington Post and ABC News shows the majority of Americans would rather see TransCanada’s pipeline finish the regulatory review process currently underway than be expediently approved by U.S. Congress.

The telephone poll of 1,003 adults was conducted between Jan. 12 and 15, and prefaced the question about Keystone XL with some background on the pipeline debate. A poll of that size has a 3.5 point error margin.

“Obama has said he won’t decide whether to approve a new oil pipeline from Canada to Texas until a review has determined whether it is in the national interest. The Republicans in Congress are working on a law to authorize the pipeline without Obama’s approval,” the question stated. Half of the survey’s respondents were then asked which side they supported.

Only 34% of respondents said the pipeline should be authorized now, while 61% said the review should be completed before a decision is made. Another 2% did not want the pipeline to be allowed and 3% had no opinion.


“I think if most people were presented with a choice of doing due-diligence and following a process through, they would choose that. I would,” TransCanada spokesman Mark Cooper said in an interview.

“However, this is not an ordinary process.”

“Normally, this process takes about two years and now we’re about six years plus,” Mr. Cooper said.

The U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee communications director Robert Dillon also downplayed the importance of the poll.

“Remember that Congress is the elected representatives of the people of America and so — hopefully — they’ll vote in a way that is accountable to their constituents. That will be the ultimate poll,” he said in a phone interview.

Mr. Obama has the power to approve construction of the pipeline because it crosses the U.S. border. In the spring of 2014, the project was in the middle of what the U.S. State Department calls the national interest determination and preparing to submit its recommendation on whether or not the president should approve the line.

Related
U.S. Senate advances Keystone XL bill as showdown with Obama looms
Your move, Obama: Nebraska court clears path for presidential decision on Keystone
However, the process stalled when landholders in Nebraska launched a legal challenge and demanded a trial on the legality of the pipeline’s route through that state.

A split decision from the Nebraska Supreme Court this month ruled that legal challenge will not result in a trial and so the State Department review process has now resumed. On Friday, the U.S. government issued a deadline of Feb. 2 for input on the national interest determination, and a recommendation is expected at some point thereafter.

That hasn’t stopped Republicans in Congress, who believe the regulatory process for the pipeline has taken too long, from trying to pass legislation that would immediately approve Keystone XL.

Mr. Dillon said that Senators would vote on amendments to a bill that would force the approval of Keystone XL on Tuesday. Those amendments include “Buy American” provisions and rules that would prevent oil carried down the line from being exported out of the United States.

U.S. support for Keystone XL pipeline is softening, new poll suggests | Financial Post
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Forcing Democratic senators to vote on Keystone XL is simply good politics. It can be used against them in their next elections if they vote against the legislation. Forcing Obama to veto Keystone XL is again good politics. It will be the first piece in painting Obama as the "gridlock president." Making them look bad is smart.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Oh another Global Warming thread... yippie

How about putting all this Global Warming BS in one pile. (thread)

Majority of Americans AGREE it’s time to BUILD Keystone XL

 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Last poll you cited was in April 2013 and the results of all of the polls from your link corroborate this new poll.

Obama wants it built.

Americans want it built.

Everyone wants proper regulatory reviews to be finalized before the pipeline is built.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
What a bogus poll and question. Even the EPA has said OK to the pipeline and they hate capitalism.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Another zero research article? WTG!

When does Obama plan on including kerogen in the OSLTF formula?

A million bbl a day and not f-cking single penny set aside for kerogen spill clean ups and restitution and snot nosed millennials are worried about a crude which is taxed to kick into the OSLTF.

WTF does that mean huh Flawssy?

Why is Canadian and domestic US crude taxed 8¢ a bbl but kerogen 0¢?

Domestic US bitumen (oil sands) are also free from this spill tax?

Was that mentioned in the survey?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
A million bbl a day and not f-cking single penny set aside for kerogen spill clean ups and restitution and snot nosed millennials are worried about a crude which is taxed to kick into the OSLTF.

WTF does that mean huh Flawssy?
Other than 'Welcome to Canada.'. When an article surfaces about toxic spills and coverups in Brazil from 40 years ago by some company called Texaco it is not to be taken that they wouldn't do the very same thing here despite us being able to wave a few pieces of paper around. When corporate profits are earmarked for private distribution there is nothing spent of frills.

There were also safeguards in place for the Yukon gold rush where the companies were to leave the land in a reclaimed state. The estimate came out to do that only within the last 20 years and the companies aren't willing to assume the burden, nor is the Government. When it happens 10/10 times in 10 differnt locations it might be looked at as a pettern rather than 'bad luck' with unforeseen consequences.

In Ft Mac if they are dumping the cleaned sand into a dump rather than shipping it south as a (cheap or even free) product then somebody should be going to jail.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Sand? In a pipeline?
rail, sand for winter roads without the need for salt, just for Alberta how much sand would be needed? Convert into $$.
Since Ontario would be getting products from that line I would be jumping at the chance to use the delay to run a big gas line to Ontario and they can ship it south using the same scam Quebec uses with NFLD power when it crosses into the US. As it stand the US could get the product and raise the price before it comes into Ontario and they would be looking at Alberta to cover that additional cost, good thing nobody from Ontario is running the country.

Enviro concerns, doesn't get any more technically more difficult in laying a pipeline than it does in Sask and Man.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
You know, that's the way the greentards like to work... Kinda like 'hottest year' on record (when the records span back just a short time).

It's good marketing, esopecially when one is directing the message to low-brow, uneducated idiots

Hottest year since 8 Track began..
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
about 75% of democrats believe in astrology and haunted houses...so what.