#mooch

Locutus
#1
James WoodsVerified account ‏@RealJamesWoods (external - login to view)

That pic of the First Lady holding the shirt cardboard to move Muslim kidnappers to tears is Photoshopped, right? That can't be real.




fukking mooch.
 
petros
+1
#2  Top Rated Post
#sand
 
Count_Lothian
#3
i don't get either of your responses #sand fukking mooch and james woods is back on crack or something.

is it my age?
 
Twila
#4
Has to be photoshopped. I'm sure she'd have been briefed that the kidnappers do not have respect for women so her plea means nothing to them.
 
damngrumpy
No Party Affiliation
#5
Besides the White house would not engage in things this way
Its too bad some people do these things to make themselves
seem to be somehow impotant
 
Locutus
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by TwilaView Post

Has to be photoshopped. I'm sure she'd have been briefed that the kidnappers do not have respect for women so her plea means nothing to them.

Quote: Originally Posted by damngrumpyView Post

Besides the White house would not engage in things this way
Its too bad some people do these things to make themselves
seem to be somehow impotant






The First LadyVerified account ‏@FLOTUS (external - login to view)

Our prayers are with the missing Nigerian girls and their families. It's time to #BringBackOurGirls (external - login to view). -mo pic.twitter.com/glDKDotJRt (external - login to view)

https://twitter.com/FLOTUS/status/46.../photo/1/large (external - login to view)

 
Locutus
+1
#7
#BringBackOurBalls





It is hard not to have total contempt for a political culture that thinks the above picture is a useful contribution to rescuing 276 schoolgirls kidnapped by jihadist savages in Nigeria. Yet some pajama boy at the White House evidently felt getting the First Lady to pose with this week's Hashtag of Western Impotence would reflect well upon the Administration. The horrible thing is they may be right: Michelle showed she cared - on social media! - and that's all that matters, isn't it?


Just as the last floppo hashtag, #WeStandWithUkraine, didn't actually involve standing with Ukraine, so #BringBackOurGirls doesn't require bringing back our girls. There are only a half-dozen special forces around the planet capable of doing that without getting most or all of the hostages killed: the British, the French, the Americans, Israelis, Germans, Aussies, maybe a couple of others. So, unless something of that nature is being lined up, those schoolgirls are headed into slavery, and the wretched pleading passivity of Mrs Obama's hashtag is just a form of moral preening.


more



#BringBackOurBalls :: SteynOnline (external - login to view)
 
Locutus
+1
#8
Once again, the Obama administration has proved that it is all “coolness” and no substance. Maybe we should start calling it the BuzzFeed administration.



Michelle Obama: Twitter Activist | National Review Online (external - login to view)
 
tay
#9
US First Lady Michelle Obama has said the mass kidnap of Nigerian schoolgirls is part of a wider pattern of threats and intimidation facing girls around the world who pursue an education.


She said she and her husband Barack Obama were "outraged and heartbroken" over the abduction on 14 April of more than 200 girls from their school.


She was speaking instead of her husband in the weekly presidential address.




Mrs Obama, who was speaking ahead of Mother's Day in the US on Sunday, said the girls reminded her and her husband of their own daughters.


"What happened in Nigeria was not an isolated incident. It's a story we see every day as girls around the world risk their lives to pursue their ambitions," she said.


She cited the Pakistani schoolgirl and campaigner Malala Yousafzai (external - login to view), who was shot and wounded by the Taliban for speaking out for girls' education.


"The courage and hope embodied by Malala and girls like her around the world should serve as a call to action," Mrs Obama said.


It is unusual for a US first lady to make outspoken foreign policy remarks, but Mrs Obama has campaigned for the girls' release


Earlier this week, she tweeted a picture of herself in the White House holding a sign with the message "#BringBackOurGirls".




BBC News - Nigeria abductions: Michelle Obama 'outraged' (external - login to view)








wwwyoutubecomwatchv043fimyKqtk

 
Locutus
+1
#10
she said
she cited

blah blah blah


protip: she's a tranny.
 
petros
#11
Arm little girls.
 
Kreskin
#12
Aren't there more important things to talk about, like Al Capone's vault?
 
Locutus
#13


BTFO
 
tay
+1
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by LocutusView Post

she said
she cited

blah blah blah


protip: she's a tranny.






You start a thread about her and yet dis her message to free the girls?


Tea Partiers are a strange bunch.............




Jim Hoft, is one of the top conservative bloggers and is often quoted by Fox News--which says a lot about them since his trademark is to write anything without verification or even proofreading. His track record of being wrong and his sheer incompetence has earned him the appropriate title of 'Dumbest Man On The Internet'.




Stupidest Man On Internet Sets Progressives Reeling With Brave Coverage Of Hahahahahahahahahaha (external - login to view)






And that was before today, when he showed that he is also a complete bastard (external - login to view):




Blogger Jim Hoft uses Nigerian sex slave teens hashtag to LOL at non-sociopath’s concerns (external - login to view)
 
Locutus
#15
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by Count_LothianView Post

i don't get either of your responses #sand fukking mooch and james woods is back on crack or something.

is it my age?

Yes it is your age.

#. Is the sign for pounds.
 
Walter
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Yes it is your age.

#. Is the sign for pounds.

It's the sign for numbers as in "number sand".
 
Twila
#18
well that's an eye opener...
 
Locutus
+1
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by TwilaView Post

well that's an eye opener...

meaningless, weak and ball-less hashtag diplomacy.
 
Twila
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by LocutusView Post

meaningless, weak and ball-less hashtag diplomacy.

I hadn't thought the gov't's would play this sort of game, though. That's the eye opening part for me.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by TwilaView Post

I hadn't thought the gov't's would play this sort of game, though. That's the eye opening part for me.

The U.S. government isn't.
 
Twila
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

The U.S. government isn't.

They didn't release the images? I'm going to have to read this whole thread again now...figure out just what they hey is going on.
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by TwilaView Post

They didn't release the images? I'm going to have to read this whole thread again now...figure out just what they hey is going on.

The First Lady is not a government offical. She has no powers, no authority to do anything that can be considered government action.

The President can do certain things by executive order, take certain unilateral actions under the Constitution, and can take action pursuant to the laws passed by the Congress. He can also do things on his own that are not Presidential functions.

For example, early in his administration, Obama and Biden hit a Five Guys Burgers and Fries in Alexandria, Virginia. This was not a government function, and it reflected no endorsement, limitation, regulation, or contract with Five Guys by the U.S. government. When the Obamas vacation in Hawaii, it does constitute action by the U.S. government in favour of, against, or neutral toward Hawaii.

When Mrs. Obama says Americans should eat better, that is not government policy or government action. And when she participates in an internet "movement," it likewish is not government policy or government action.
 
Twila
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

The First Lady is not a government offical. She has no powers, no authority to do anything that can be considered government action.

The President can do certain things by executive order, take certain unilateral actions under the Constitution, and can take action pursuant to the laws passed by the Congress. He can also do things on his own that are not Presidential functions.

For example, early in his administration, Obama and Biden hit a Five Guys Burgers and Fries in Alexandria, Virginia. This was not a government function, and it reflected no endorsement, limitation, regulation, or contract with Five Guys by the U.S. government. When the Obamas vacation in Hawaii, it does constitute action by the U.S. government in favour of, against, or neutral toward Hawaii.

When Mrs. Obama says Americans should eat better, that is not government policy or government action. And when she participates in an internet "movement," it likewish is not government policy or government action.

right, gotcha. Do they have any say in what she does?
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by TwilaView Post

right, gotcha. Do they have any say in what she does?

They can try to persuade her, and she tends to support what President Obama does. But legally and formally, she is nothing more and nothing less than a citizen. Some First Ladies (Wilson, Eleanor Roosevelt) have been extremely active in government policy. Others, notably Mary Todd Lincoln, barely even played White House hostess, much less participated in policy. But in any case, the First Lady has influence because of her (presumably) close relationship with the President, but she has no power of any kind whatsoever. She also has no "duties" other than the ones she chooses to take on.

P.S. She's also not paid.
 
Walter
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

P.S. She's also not paid.

But her staff is.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

But her staff is.

She doesn't have a staff. The White House has a staff.

Sorry, Walter. You can go anyplace you want with this, rant and rave about this or that First Lady, positive or negative. Nothing will change the fact that the First Lady is not a government official, holds no government authority, and nothing she says or does can be considered an action of the government.
 
Walter
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

She doesn't have a staff. The White House has a staff.

Sorry, Walter. You can go anyplace you want with this, rant and rave about this or that First Lady, positive or negative. Nothing will change the fact that the First Lady is not a government official, holds no government authority, and nothing she says or does can be considered an action of the government.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepre...e-Salaries.htm


1. $172,2000 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)

2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)

3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)

4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)

5. Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

6. $90,000 - Medina, David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)

8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)

9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)

10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

11. Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)

13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)

14. Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)

15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)

16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)

17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)

18. Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)

19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)

21. Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)

22. Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)

Read more at snopes.com: First Lady Requires More Than Twenty Attendants (external - login to view)
Michelle Obama Staff - Michelle Obama Staff Size and Salaries
 
Tecumsehsbones
#29
Fine. Everything you've said is true. Still don't make Mrs. Obama a government official, give her any government authority, or make anything she says or does government policy or government action.
 
pgs
Free Thinker
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Fine. Everything you've said is true. Still don't make Mrs. Obama a government official, give her any government authority, or make anything she says or does government policy or government action.

But she still uses up over 1 million dollars of public resources for staffing alone .
They haven't even started to spend yet . Hmmmn I wonder really what it costs to keep a first lady ?
This lists all her entourage but omits her other servants , you know cleaning and cooking and walking the dog .
 
no new posts