States seek to nullify Obama efforts

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Infuriated by what they see as the long arm of Washington reaching into their business, states are increasingly telling the feds: Keep out!
Bills that would negate a variety of federal laws have popped up this year in the vast majority of states - with the amount of anti-federal legislation sharply on the rise during the Obama administration, according to experts.


The “nullification” trend in recent years has largely focused on three areas: gun control; health care; and national standards for driver’s licenses. It’s touched off fierce fights within the states, and between the states and the feds, as well as raising questions and court battles about whether any of it is legal.


In at least 37 states legislation has been introduced that in some way guts federal gun regulations, according to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. The bills were signed into law this spring in two states, Kansas and Alaska, and in two more lawmakers hope to override a governor’s veto. Twenty states since 2010 have passed laws that either opt out of or challenge mandatory parts of Obamacare, the National Conference of State Legislatures says. And half the states have OK’d measures aimed knocking back the Real ID Act of 2005, which dictates Washington’s requirements for issuing driver’s licenses.


“Rosa Parks is the beacon of light: If you say no to something, you can change the world,” Michael Boldin, the Founder of the Tenth Amendment Center, which favors states’ rights, told POLITICO.


more


States seek to nullify Obama efforts - Tal Kopan - POLITICO.com
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,565
7,076
113
Washington DC
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."
U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65


Obama on unilateral action: Lawyers? I don’t need lawyers. | WashingtonExaminer.com
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,565
7,076
113
Washington DC
I continue to hope, against all odds, that I'll see some evidence that Slowcutus and you are merely provoking, or have a point.

The hope is diminishing.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."
U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2.

Unless, of course, they are unconstitutional laws, such as gun control, persecution of the media, re-trying court cases, ....etc etc
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."
U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2.
What happens if the fed makes a stupid law, though? Or what happens if the fed breaks its own law?
 

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
She doesn't have the discipline to simply walk away.

At this point I must refer our dear readers to yesterday, post #8. the 'ben Christensen posting' were an enraged Locotus 'quotes himself', thereby breaking the cardinal board rule

Set by the same Locotus....


OOOH, Loco- the ghost of debates past has arriverrrrrrred...........................................BOO:p

 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Unless, of course, they are unconstitutional laws, such as gun control, persecution of the media, re-trying court cases, ....etc etc
So, yelling "fire" in an enclosed, crowded place with limited exit should be legal. Or magazines and clips should be able to hold a thousand rounds. Should Gates, Buffett, or Ellison be allowed to have cruise missiles?
Retrying court cases? Really?
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
At this point I must refer our dear readers to yesterday, post #8. the 'ben Christensen posting' were an enraged Locotus 'quotes himself', thereby breaking the cardinal board rule

Set by the same Locotus....


OOOH, Loco- the ghost of debates past has arriverrrrrrred...........................................BOO:p


Obviously (to most intelligent people), this was intentional so as to display your rush-to-post butchering of a quote because you don't know how the square bracket function works. Carry on. ;-)
 

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
Obviously (to most intelligent people), this was intentional so as to display your rush-to-post butchering of a quote because you don't know how the square bracket function works. Carry on. ;-)


Now Now, Mister L- Temper temper watch .....:p
 
Last edited:

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."
U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2.



Which is why the states (especially the Red ones) are so quick to take Federal dollars.
 

Highball

Council Member
Jan 28, 2010
1,170
1
38
Gopher has it right. They don't assist with federal dollars (which really source from excess taxes paid by the people) with strings attached allowing federal rules to apply to those states that take the money. Previously "Revenue Sharing" and "Community Redevelopment Funds" came from the same source too. Now look at what happens when the feds exercise their perceived rights when those funds are cut off. They think they have to right to dictate to the states and communities forever.