Know what the U.S. needs? Another George Bush.

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,609
99
48
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
WTF, do they have a problem coming up with first names in that family or something?

And I wouldn't put "George Bush" and "Hope" in the same line.... Obama kind of already screwed up the whole "Hope" thing....

The name "George Bush" doesn't bring "Hope".... that name usually brings "War" which for some odd reason, usually ends up somewhere in the middle east.
 

WJW

Nominee Member
Jul 6, 2012
56
0
6
How does one explain to those who, in light of the facts, continue to blindly support President Bush and his failed policies? How much evidence does it take to make the people see the light? Are we safer now that we have overthrown Saddam Hussein? Is the world safer? No. The policies of the Bush administration, rather than promoting stability in world, have created instability in the most volatile region of the last half century (And now continued in Afghanistan). The right-wing propagandists say that we are safer now; they point to the fact that we have not been attacked as proof. It is not proof. It is axiomatic that the existence (or non-existence) of an asserted fact cannot be proved by negative inference (e.g., that we are more safe now because we have not been attacked); and if you listen to the pundits and the propagandists, you will be lulled into a very false sense of security.
 

WJW

Nominee Member
Jul 6, 2012
56
0
6
Bigness rules. What are you going to do about it?

Apparently, nothing. And so, it's back to business as usual.

Is that comforting?
 

WJW

Nominee Member
Jul 6, 2012
56
0
6
ad hominens? - I asked a question.

Apparently, nothing is questionable anymore without casting aspersions.