When lawyers say "fair use", they don't mean fair to humans.

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
But then you knew that when you saw the word lawyers



Algorithms Are the New Content Creators, and That’s Bad News for Humans

When the news hit that a photographer was suing BuzzFeed for $3.6 million for reusing one of his images, some on the internet reacted with fear and horror. Because many of those people — and websites — are notoriously loose with reusing images, and they like to hide behind the blithe view that it’s all “fair use.”

These debates about the bounds of fair use will always be important, but they obscure a very unfair dynamic that is squeezing artists — and turning the web into a battleground between humans and machines. The trouble is that in many cases today, there’s no human artist, writer, or editor creating what we see on the web. Some algorithm assembled the photos and it’s enjoying a nice little loophole. The machines sail on past the rules about copyright because the law lets those companies blame any infringement on the chaos of the internet. It’s a system that’s tilting the tables against any of the human artists who write, edit, or illustrate.

In other words, the battle for fair use is unfair to anyone who plays by the old rules and tries to share with the artists because human creatives can’t compete with the automated services that aren’t sharing with the artists.


more


Algorithms Are the New Content Creators, and That's Bad News for Humans | Wired Opinion | Wired.com