Religion Makes People Helpful And Generous -- Under Certain Conditions
ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2008) — Belief in God encourages people to be helpful, honest and generous, but only under certain psychological conditions, according to University of British Columbia researchers who analyzed the past three decades of social science research.
Religious people are more likely than the non-religious to engage in prosocial behaviour – acts that benefit others at a personal cost – when it enhances the individual's reputation or when religious thoughts are freshly activated in the person's mind, say UBC social psychologists Ara Norenzayan and Azim Shariff
Their paper "The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality" appears in the October 3, 2008 issue of the journal Science.
The two-part paper first reviews data from anthropology, sociology, psychology and economics. Norenzayan and Shariff then go on to explore how religion, by encouraging cooperation, became a factor in making possible the rise of large and stable societies made of genetically unrelated individuals.
To date, says Norenzayan, the public debate whether religion fosters cooperation and trust has largely been driven by opinion and anecdote.
"We wanted to look at the hard scientific evidence," says Norenzayan, an associate professor in the Dept. of Psychology.
The investigators found complementary results across the disciplines:
Shariff adds, "One reason we now have large, cooperative societies may be that some aspects of religion – such as outsourcing costly social policing duties to all-powerful Gods – made societies work more cooperatively in the past."
Across cultures and through time, observe the authors, the notion of an all-powerful, morally concerned "Big God" usually begat "Big groups" –large-scale, stable societies that successfully passed on their cultural beliefs.
The study also points out that in today's world religion has no monopoly on kind and generous behaviour. In many findings, non-believers acted as prosocially as believers. The last several hundred years has seen the rise of non-religious institutional mechanisms that include effective policing, courts and social surveillance.
"Some of the most cooperative modern societies are also the most secular," says Norenzayan. "People have found other ways to be cooperative – without God."
Source Also in the October 3 issue of Science where there is a much more in depth analysis of the data.
It seems that religious belief was important to our species in helping establish civilization. Now the next step is to find ways to advance without religion.
I forget who said herding atheists is like trying to herd cats (I think it was Dawkins) but apparently if we are to advance we need to find methods of unifying ourselves (I am including agnostics in this definition, maybe even very moderate religious people). Perhaps there is some kind of genetic disposition toward religiosity that could be somehow exploited to this end. I was taken with Socrates explanation of Greek polytheism and saw in it just such a mechanism. This may explain why the Greeks were so brilliant.
ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2008) — Belief in God encourages people to be helpful, honest and generous, but only under certain psychological conditions, according to University of British Columbia researchers who analyzed the past three decades of social science research.
Religious people are more likely than the non-religious to engage in prosocial behaviour – acts that benefit others at a personal cost – when it enhances the individual's reputation or when religious thoughts are freshly activated in the person's mind, say UBC social psychologists Ara Norenzayan and Azim Shariff
Their paper "The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality" appears in the October 3, 2008 issue of the journal Science.
The two-part paper first reviews data from anthropology, sociology, psychology and economics. Norenzayan and Shariff then go on to explore how religion, by encouraging cooperation, became a factor in making possible the rise of large and stable societies made of genetically unrelated individuals.
To date, says Norenzayan, the public debate whether religion fosters cooperation and trust has largely been driven by opinion and anecdote.
"We wanted to look at the hard scientific evidence," says Norenzayan, an associate professor in the Dept. of Psychology.
The investigators found complementary results across the disciplines:
- Empirical data within anthropology suggests there is more cooperation among religious societies than the non-religious, especially when group survival is under threat
- Economic experiments indicate that religiosity increases levels of trust among participants
- Psychology experiments show that thoughts of an omniscient, morally concerned God reduce levels of cheating and selfish behaviour
Shariff adds, "One reason we now have large, cooperative societies may be that some aspects of religion – such as outsourcing costly social policing duties to all-powerful Gods – made societies work more cooperatively in the past."
Across cultures and through time, observe the authors, the notion of an all-powerful, morally concerned "Big God" usually begat "Big groups" –large-scale, stable societies that successfully passed on their cultural beliefs.
The study also points out that in today's world religion has no monopoly on kind and generous behaviour. In many findings, non-believers acted as prosocially as believers. The last several hundred years has seen the rise of non-religious institutional mechanisms that include effective policing, courts and social surveillance.
"Some of the most cooperative modern societies are also the most secular," says Norenzayan. "People have found other ways to be cooperative – without God."
Source Also in the October 3 issue of Science where there is a much more in depth analysis of the data.
It seems that religious belief was important to our species in helping establish civilization. Now the next step is to find ways to advance without religion.
I forget who said herding atheists is like trying to herd cats (I think it was Dawkins) but apparently if we are to advance we need to find methods of unifying ourselves (I am including agnostics in this definition, maybe even very moderate religious people). Perhaps there is some kind of genetic disposition toward religiosity that could be somehow exploited to this end. I was taken with Socrates explanation of Greek polytheism and saw in it just such a mechanism. This may explain why the Greeks were so brilliant.
What [religion] other than God's religion is that these [Jews and Christians] crave, when to Him is resigned [and yielded] whosoever is in the heavens and the earth [: the planets including the earth], willingly or loath, and to His [judgment] shall they return [after death]!?)eanassirhttp://man-after-death.741.com
