Who was correct, Jews or Christians? Was Eden our elevation or our fall?

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
Who was correct, Jews or Christians? Was Eden our elevation or our fall?

The Jewish view. http://www.mrrena.com/misc/judaism2.php

“Instead of the Fall of man (in the sense of humanity as a whole), Judaism preaches the Rise of man: and instead of Original Sin, it stresses Original Virtue”

In a nutshell, the Jews saw man acquiring a moral sense equal to God’s, --- as man being elevated.

Gen 3; 22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil:

The Christian view sees the same story and preaches our fal land all of us inheriting our forefather’s sin. http://www.biblegateway.com/resources/dictionaries/dict_meaning.php?source=1&wid=T0001304

“They prove the loss not only of innocence but of original righteousness, and, with it, of the favour and fellowship of God.”

The Bible seems to favor the Jewish view.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Ezekiel 18:20 (ESV)The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.

The declaration which says that God visits the sins of the fathers upon the children is contrary to every principle of moral justice.[Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason]

Whose view is more intelligent and moral and why?

Regards
DL
 

cj44

Electoral Member
Sep 18, 2013
740
0
16
Frenchie, I do not think these verses are referring to original sin. They are referring to individual sin - every person is accountable to God based on what he/she does or does not do. John 9:1-3, As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2 His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” 3 “Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him.

I thought Jewish people were aware of original sin. I will have to look into that as I do not know enough on the subject.

I think the question people have to ask themselves is Why am I/people unable to be and do good all the time? Why do humans lie, commit crime, war, etc. If our natures were sound, then there would not be such mayhem in the world. As a christian, I can say we do not view original sin as inheriting our forefathers individual sins. Rather our nature is sinful. You know by now my analogies stink. But, you also know that won't stop me from attempting to construct one. Here it goes - the nature of a fish is to swim, so it does. It doesn't one day think to itself, hmmm. I think I will go for a walk on the shore today. It doesn't think that because it - well because it is a stinking fish - it can't walk on the shore. We humans may think, hmmm, I would like to be good to all/not sin from this day forth. But our nature will not allow it. If we didn't have this sinful nature, then we should have the ability to be sinless. I know a lot of nice people, but not a one of them is sinless.

Also, if we look at all of nature - it's a mess. Disease, disorder, animals hunting each other. When Jesus wraps it all up, the lion will lay beside the lamb and not rip its head off. Won't that be nice?
 

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
cj44

I understand your analogy quite well and agree that sin is a part of our nature. Happily it is a small part that only comes out as required.

Let me give you a copy of an O P I did a while back that might help here.

First, remember that what you see in this first link could not happen if we were predominantly evil instead of predominantly good.

Hans Rosling's 200 Countries, 200 Years, 4 Minutes - The Joy of Stats - BBC Four - YouTube

=================

Can you help but do evil? Ido not see how. Do you?

And if you cannot, why wouldGod punish you?

Christians are always tryingto absolve God of moral culpability in the fall by putting forward their freewill argument and placing all the blame on mankind.

That usually sounds like----God gave us free will and it was our free willed choices that caused ourfall. Hence God is not blameworthy. Such statements simply avoid God'sculpability as the author and creator of human nature.

Free will is only the abilityto choose. It is not an explanation why anyone would want to choose"A" or "B" (bad or good action). An explanation for why Evewould even have the nature of "being vulnerable to being easily swayed bya serpent" and "desiring to eat a forbidden fruit" must lie inthe nature God gave Eve in the first place. Hence God is culpable fordeliberately making humans with a nature-inclined-to-fall, and "freewill" means nothing as a response to this problem.

If all do evil/sin by naturethen, the evil/sin nature is dominant. If not, we would have at least some whowould not do evil/sin. Can we then help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?

Having said the above for theGod that I do not believe in, I am a Gnostic Christian naturalist, let me tellyou that evil and sin is all human generated and in this sense, I agree withChristians, but for completely different reasons. Evil is mankind’sresponsibility and not some imaginary God’s. Free will is something that canonly be taken. Free will cannot be given not even by a God unless it has beenforcibly withheld.

Much has been written toexplain evil and sin but I see as a natural part of evolution.

Consider.
First, let us eliminate whatsome see as evil. Natural disasters. These are unthinking occurrences and areneither good nor evil. There is no intent to do evil even as victims arecreated. Without intent to do evil, no act should be called evil.

In secular courts, this iscalled mens rea. Latin for an evil mind or intent and without it, the court willnot find someone guilty even if they know that they are the perpetrator of theact.

Evil then is only human tohuman when they know they are doing evil and intend harm.

As evolving creatures, all weever do, and ever can do, is compete or cooperate.

Cooperation we would see asgood as there are no victims created. Competition would be seen as evil as itcreates a victim. We all are either cooperating, doing good, or competing,doing evil, at all times.

Without us doing some ofboth, we would likely go extinct.

This, to me, explains whythere is evil in the world quite well.

Be you a believer in nature,evolution or God, you should see that what Christians see as something toblame, evil, we should see that what we have, competition, deserves a huge thanksfor being available to us. Wherever it came from, God or nature, withoutevolution we would go extinct. We must do good and evil.

There is no conflict betweennature and God on this issue. This is how things are and should be. We all mustdo what some will think is evil as we compete and create losers to thiscompetition.

These links speak to theisticevolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXOvYn1OAL0&list=UUDXjzOeZRqLxhYaaEhWLb_A&index=9

If theistic evolution istrue, then the myth of Eden should be read as a myth and there is not reallyany original sin.

If the above is notconvincing enough for you then show me where in this baby evil lives or is apart of it’s nature and instincts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBW5vdhr_PA

Can you help but do evil? Ido not see how. Do you?

And if you cannot, why wouldGod punish you?

Regards
DL
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Isa:40:15:
Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket,
and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold,
he taketh up the isles as a very little thing.

Before that though comes our bad news.

Isa:56:8-12:
The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith,
Yet will I gather others to him,
beside those that are gathered unto him.
All ye beasts of the field,
come to devour,
yea,
all ye beasts in the forest.
His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant,
they are all dumb dogs,
they cannot bark;
sleeping,
lying down, loving to slumber.
Yea,
they are greedy dogs which can never have enough,
and they are shepherds that cannot understand:
they all look to their own way,
every one for his gain,
from his quarter.
Come ye,
say they,
I will fetch wine,
and we will fill ourselves with strong drink;
and to morrow shall be as this day,
and much more abundant.

Jer:25:32-38:
Thus saith the LORD of hosts,
Behold,
evil shall go forth from nation to nation,
and a great whirlwind shall be raised up from the coasts of the earth.
And the slain of the LORD shall be at that day from one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth:
they shall not be lamented,
neither gathered,
nor buried;
they shall be dung upon the ground.
Howl, ye shepherds,
and cry;
and wallow yourselves in the ashes,
ye principal of the flock:
for the days of your slaughter and of your dispersions are accomplished;
and ye shall fall like a pleasant vessel.
And the shepherds shall have no way to flee,
nor the principal of the flock to escape.
A voice of the cry of the shepherds,
and an howling of the principal of the flock,
shall be heard:
for the LORD hath spoiled their pasture.
And the peaceable habitations are cut down because of the fierce anger of the LORD.
He hath forsaken his covert,
as the lion:
for their land is desolate because of the fierceness of the oppressor,
and because of his fierce anger.

Zec:13:8-9:
And it shall come to pass,
that in all the land,
saith the LORD,
two parts therein shall be cut off and die;
but the third shall be left therein.
And I will bring the third part through the fire,
and will refine them as silver is refined,
and will try them as gold is tried:
they shall call on my name,
and I will hear them:
I will say,
It is my people:
and they shall say,
The LORD is my God.

Zec:14:16:
And it shall come to pass,
that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King,
the LORD of hosts,
and to keep the feast of tabernacles.

Lu:24:27:
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets,
he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Who was correct, Jews or Christians?
Neither.

Hey French Parrot. Christians have sweet f*ck all use for the OT.
I've heard quite a few of them cite it in support of their views on homosexuality as an abomination, and to justify keeping the Harry Potter books out of school libraries, and there are many posts from nominal Christians right here--#5 above for instance--that make extensive use of it. I'd say you're demonstrably wrong about that.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
John 9:1-3, As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2 His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” 3 “Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him.
I take this to mean that reincarnation was a common belief at the time. Otherwise, why would the man be blind from birth if he had not be bad in his previous life.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
God intentionally made the man blind so his healing of said eyesight would be witnessed by some who would then become believers themselves. I assume the man gets to say a few words about that part 'a' of a plan 'ab'
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
And what about all the blind who don't get healed, were born blind or lost their sight due to injury or disease? There's some divine lesson to be learned from them?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
God intentionally made the man blind so his healing of said eyesight would be witnessed by some who would then become believers themselves. I assume the man gets to say a few words about that part 'a' of a plan 'ab'
That is not the point. The apostle asked a question that could only be interpreted as meaning he believed in reincarnation. It was a common belief at the time.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,371
11,435
113
Low Earth Orbit
Neither.

I've heard quite a few of them cite it in support of their views on homosexuality as an abomination, and to justify keeping the Harry Potter books out of school libraries, and there are many posts from nominal Christians right here--#5 above for instance--that make extensive use of it. I'd say you're demonstrably wrong about that.

Born yesterdays aren't real Christians.

And what about all the blind who don't get healed, were born blind or lost their sight due to injury or disease? There's some divine lesson to be learned from them?

Do you credit God for the good things or just what you perceive as bad?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
And what about all the blind who don't get healed, were born blind or lost their sight due to injury or disease? There's some divine lesson to be learned from them?
'The plan' has that covered, only comes when the fixes can be enjoyed for eternity, doing that for the masses before that time would be break the prophecies.

Isa:42:9:
Behold,
the former things are come to pass,
and new things do I declare:
before they spring forth I tell you of them.

Jer:4:28:
For this shall the earth mourn,
and the heavens above be black:
because I have spoken it,
I have purposed it,
and will not repent,
neither will I turn back from it.

Isa:55:11:
So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth:
it shall not return unto me void,
but it shall accomplish that which I please,
and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

Jer:31:8-9:
Behold,
I will bring them from the north country,
and gather them from the coasts of the earth,
and with them the blind and the lame,
the woman with child and her that travaileth with child together:
a great company shall return thither.
They shall come with weeping,
and with supplications will I lead them:
I will cause them to walk by the rivers of waters in a straight way,
wherein they shall not stumble:
for I am a father to Israel,
and Ephraim is my firstborn.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
'The plan' has that covered, only comes when the fixes can be enjoyed for eternity, doing that for the masses before that time would be break the prophecies.
Are you saying you believe that God makes people, ill, blind, lame etc on purpose?
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Born yesterdays aren't real Christians.
And who are you to decide that? They certainly think they are, and would probably say the same about you.That argument's getting pretty tiresome, Christians behaving badly are derided by other Christians as being not real Christians, as if that gets the Christian belief system off the hook. That doesn't work.
Do you credit God for the good things or just what you perceive as bad?
I don't credit god with anything, I'm convinced he's entirely fictional, and one of the nastiest characters to be found in fiction anywhere.

Are you saying you believe that God makes people, ill, blind, lame etc on purpose?
No other interpretation is possible.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,371
11,435
113
Low Earth Orbit
And who are you to decide that? They certainly think they are, and would probably say the same about you.
And they would be wrong and i'd be right. My beliefs are the original beliefs that haven't been altered by a king or heretic with an agenda that goes outside of the original beliefs.

I don't credit god with anything, I'm convinced he's entirely fictional, and one of the nastiest characters to be found in fiction anywhere.
What makes you believe it's fiction?
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
And again, they would say the same thing about you. But there's no possibility you could be wrong, you alone, or perhaps you and whatever group of Christians you belong to, have figured out Jesus' original message and intentions. That sort of casual arrogance is one of the things that's wrong with religious belief.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,371
11,435
113
Low Earth Orbit
And again, they would say the same thing about you. But there's no possibility you could be wrong, you alone, or perhaps you and whatever group of Christians you belong to, have figured out Jesus' original message and intentions. That sort of casual arrogance is one of the things that's wrong with religious belief.
Jesus' message is clear as a bell and always has been to those who didn't waiver or follow a heretic.

I'm still waiting on your reasoning as to why God is a fiction.

What do you call the energy that turns matter into living self-aware, conscious beings or makes a crystal grow?