Canadian companies moving south to avoid US tariffs.


White_Unifier
#1
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle...nts-etats-unis

I couldn't find this in English, sorry.

Anyway, as I'd said at the start: Canada cannot win a trade war with the US. The US has ten times our population. Given our comparative sizes, Canada's best bet is unilateral global free trade:

http://www.ceocouncil.ca/wp-content/...-May-20141.pdf

We often forget that tariffs impose extra costs on businesses that must import machinery and materials and pay their workers more to compensate for the extra cost of living caused by tariffs. They also lose out on economies of scale. Unilateral global free trade reduces overhead costs and free businesses to buy the best machines and materials on world markets, reduce consumer costs and so allow businesses to pay workers less without harming their quality of life. Let's think outside the box here. Trudeau was a fool to take on an elephant like the US head on like he did. When David faces Goliath, he can't fight using the same strategy Goliath would use.
 
taxslave
+1
#2
We cant afford free trade with countries that pay pennies a day for labour and have no labour or environmental rules.
 
Twin_Moose
+1
#3
WU is only concerned about his cheaper product purchases not about Canada or other countries protecting their economy.
 
MHz
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Trudeau was a fool to take on an elephant like the US head on like he did. When David faces Goliath, he can't fight using the same strategy Goliath would use.

What makes you think a nation that is $22T in debt to the World Bank is the top of the global food chain?
 
MHz
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

We cant afford free trade with countries that pay pennies a day for labour and have no labour or environmental rules.

The same ones that came in after the boom was over and now they make things way to expensive to build at all. Those rules??
 
DaSleeper
+1
#6
Motokar mipapin cieri anepuror! Ehote denatat ridog fo ebopie fivepe munaf ete. Fa oremabud mus peroner. Kete tok mar iniliyan ma copol pa lunog niedi na. Ocidere susud meh, ure malosi erimoneq holudid latunip sinesi liena etok rep? Pomo edilew rimolu peb! Repe iemepisif atira rol igoregoy. Retipa nierahik irigonid me fedir nacesot. Icani donore eranipi tigora: Mate la gira. Iga meneh elesoco nopom loroso riqela fon ohil. Coqam otup fenal tusihus sotek fet, tel selerep liracal dere emeletu dielilev ce curora! Porebo larat pot ru bali tecir: Yaxinier olapahet sowu oli mepa ney raciv gubita, sisinil robana uro sutibes. Ce tal mitole nirer da yope itecayen pe. Reba riese sed ine pof veseco co tet cul
Last edited by DaSleeper; 2 weeks ago at 12:20 PM..
 
MHz
#7
Retard.
 
DaSleeper
+1
#8
Sotoge per tot dibedon madi renehaf yoro? Ladel romobo ibixa nenied li he begubes evorere: Ene ace ritura yie lim xeber tale: Eta otad orute ritiha! Ecayalet fegosu seyure semeci oni orehayat tiget tom, ru neciye aten cu resunap vati ieciem; nenires ewotihis selame ropam ropul ehup be cehil apo; ena ade lede tegita warieha sivina tof. Bebe noso ciele mu tenut isari sofus ero; sese hiexot cel. Picokil ieralitir utalen tetot papice; nihihe lap saroxo bi. Tab etasarer ra dela ril misoh geranes tec yas hive. Doberiel ciecenu latere ner riemolir tu ime ses nimiemil ate; pinot lir puyapid yienekuc na idehetar mini ilidate potal icima. Nir esaroko beseges lemutied oyeseral ise fig ierelic linaco. Nedi ra new nof eyaco edo sunafi liya tasat sumene. Josason eme onasi.
One conamih re mejar evar fiecesev itov: Adihum apepihur rateno seceha. Ebesara eticat tebo! Esan dit conene.
 
White_Unifier
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

WU is only concerned about his cheaper product purchases not about Canada or other countries protecting their economy.

Twin Moose just opposes free markets.
 
Twin_Moose
+2
#10
Yep, I prefer fair market, and a chance at above living wages. By paying a bit more to spread the wealth around in a domestic market is far more preferable than buying cheap products off the backs off foreign slave or impoverished workers.
 
White_Unifier
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Yep, I prefer fair market, and a chance at above living wages. By paying a bit more to spread the wealth around in a domestic market is far more preferable than buying cheap products off the backs off foreign slave or impoverished workers.

Higher tariffs might mean higher wages, but they also mean a higher cost of living. In fact, since tariffs undermine economies of scale, they're more likely to increase costs than they are wages. We can't look at it in such a linear fashion. I remember earning less in Montreal years ago yet still being able to put more in the bank than after I started earning more in Toronto at one point. From your logic, I was doing better in Toronto due to my earning more. That's too simplistic. You need to factor costs into the equation too, otherwise we end up with the squeued logic that at that time, I was better off in Toronto for no other reason that I was earning more without takiing comparative costs into account.
 
taxslave
+1
#12
So if we buy all our junk from third world countries that use slave labour who besides government employees and a few resource workers would have a job in Canada that would pay enough to buy anything?
 
White_Unifier
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

So if we buy all our junk from third world countries that use slave labour who besides government employees and a few resource workers would have a job in Canada that would pay enough to buy anything?

Hong Kong has adopted unilateral global free trade for the most part, yet their wages are comparable to those in Canada, but the cost of goods is much less expensive than it is here. If we just look at wages, we're doing a little better than Hong Kong is. Once we factor in the cost of goods, they're doing much better except in the area of housing (but that's just because of their high populaiton density).

So according to your theory, Hong Kong and Singapore and maybe even New Zealand should all be third-world backwater failed states by now. How do you explain that?
 
White_Unifier
#14
Remember that there are many things we can't import so easily. Do you think the Chinese can write a better English dictionary than we can? Some might, but few could. They might be able to priint it en masse, but certainly not write it. Same with English-language computer programs. Also, you can't import a ready-made house. Some components might be pre-assembled, but we'd still need local workers to build the final product. What? You think they'd prebuild entire houses and ship them on barges?
 
taxslave
+1
#15
You think they'd prebuild entire houses and ship them on barges?
Actually they can and do. Also prebuild and ship in a seacan.
A log home builder I know built several chalets, put them in a seacan and shipped them to Switzerland, then went over and set them up.
 
White_Unifier
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

You think they'd prebuild entire houses and ship them on barges?
Actually they can and do. Also prebuild and ship in a seacan.
A log home builder I know built several chalets, put them in a seacan and shipped them to Switzerland, then went over and set them up.

Do you realize that China is highly dependent on food imports? Much of their agricultural land is unproductive. Chinese tourism is growing too. Also, why would they sell anything to us unless they want something in return. We give them money for the things we buy. I presume they don't just burn that money but intend to spend it later.

Again, how do you explain Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand?
 
Hoid
#17
Houses in the lower mainland that are in the way of development are commonly put on barges and sent over to the island(s).

They are a big business over here.

Way easier to just haul in an entire house than build it in places in may cases.
 
Hoid
#18
I also believe it was common in Newfoundland to haul houses across the water/ice to smaller islands.
 
Curious Cdn
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Do you realize that China is highly dependent on food imports? Much of their agricultural land is unproductive. Chinese tourism is growing too. Also, why would they sell anything to us unless they want something in return. We give them money for the things we buy. I presume they don't just burn that money but intend to spend it later.
Again, how do you explain Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand?

One or two really bad harvest years (and they happen) and China's 1.3 billion become a MAJOR liability and danger to themselves. China is one big volcanic eruption somewhere on Earth away from a second Chinese revolution.
 
MHz
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Houses in the lower mainland that are in the way of development are commonly put on barges and sent over to the island(s).

They are a big business over here.

Way easier to just haul in an entire house than build it in places in may cases.

The flattest part of the Island is already taken was on a 12% slope. Barge them up to where the pipeline was destined to come out. Build it and they will come. They would be better off building on the steep parts first and leave the flat land for food.
 
MHz
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

One or two really bad harvest years (and they happen) and China's 1.3 billion become a MAJOR liability and danger to themselves. China is one big volcanic eruption somewhere on Earth away from a second Chinese revolution.

. . . or not, . . . .
 
Curious Cdn
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Do you realize that China is highly dependent on food imports? Much of their agricultural land is unproductive. Chinese tourism is growing too. Also, why would they sell anything to us unless they want something in return. We give them money for the things we buy. I presume they don't just burn that money but intend to spend it later.
Again, how do you explain Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand?

Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

. . . or not, . . . .

Maybe not
 
MHz
#23
While everybody is trying to box in Iran, Russia and China are building a line that will mean the Ukraine will need to be inking a deal with Iran if they want more than candles for light and heat all year round.
 
Curious Cdn
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

While everybody is trying to box in Iran, Russia and China are building a line that will mean the Ukraine will need to be inking a deal with Iran if they want more than candles for light and heat all year round.

They are not uber alles. They are massively overpopulated.
 
MHz
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Do you realize that China is highly dependent on food imports?

Every nation imports food, the issue is how well would they make out in a siege applied by the IMF. That is one of the tools they use when they move into an area, they take away that ability as much as possible. Our main diet is flour and Canola oil, that is not by accident. Many in South Africa and the Ukraine are hungry as the food grown there is shipped out of the country.



Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Much of their agricultural land is unproductive.

You mean not as productive as Monsanto fields, Right?



Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Chinese tourism is growing too.

Inside the country and outside. Canada and the US are not their destinations.



Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Also, why would they sell anything to us unless they want something in return.

Why would they have to buy anything from is if they have other suppliers that are cheaper and closer and less likely to stab you in the back at some point.



Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

We give them money for the things we buy. I presume they don't just burn that money but intend to spend it later.

Sure they will, to buy natural resources from somebody else. India and Iran and Syria and Africa and South America could make sure there was nothing left to ship to North America, . . . at any price. We should be the leading supplier of hemp to the world. The amount we produce isn't enough for shoelaces for everybody. We have nobody but ourselves to blame either. 'Gutless wonders' will be what the 'beloved baby-boomers' will be remembered as.



Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

Again, how do you explain Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand?

Walmart, CostCo and Sears for the global community as the business men from there are so crooked they have to 'be contained' to 'small groups'
 
MHz
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

They are not uber alles. They are massively overpopulated.

They probably feel the same way about 'you and your kind'. Are they using too much of the planet for 'your liking' as 'you' cannot start a war against them and have a hope in hell of winning it??
 
DaSleeper
+2
#27
'your 'you' a your way liking' in about planet as too them the start of hope they have winning Are of They using probably against and a cannot much and the kind'. feel war same for it?? 'you hell
 
MHz
#28
 
DaSleeper
+1
#29
Cielalit asi pe rotum cavis inol arasemied! Cekef noti anisato rilone cen tes esu tey iwosa! Nepa noboda cosi xekef topire sep tenil la ta me. Fipiten ken ce nehie ocodela de rier, pi dasit pin? To amax eloto sereho go lieteso: Dogupi niliro foy. Vobigi rabo adane rer yoto apiebugi conugi suce sename. Irili rabien leras rorohe bur te eroget vo kigavu nigav! Pefanin remiref alesun pasoto sa helol ka rib ne esal! Uritieme dutil le cetes.
 
MHz
#30
Told ya, full on fuking retard. Hahahaha