Pompeo says Canada's claim to the Northwest Passage is 'illegitimate'


Curious Cdn
+1
#31
Maybe, it's syphilis that's rotting his brain.
 
Most helpful post: The members here have rated this post as best reply.
White_Unifier
#32
Quote: Originally Posted by Cannuck View Post

I doubt she even touches him

Do you blame her? Go stick your snake in a thousand different holes and then see if your wife would touch you afterwards without you getting thoroughly tested first. And even then, what's the point of testing if you go awhoring again before the last test results are in? Waste of time to even get tested then.
 
White_Unifier
#33
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Maybe, it's syphilis that's rotting his brain.

But no worries. Coldstream just worries that a man would have given it to Trump. As long as his STIs all come from women, it's all good.
 
Kreskin
+3
#34
Maga!
 
B00Mer
#35
Quote: Originally Posted by Kreskin View Post

Maga!

Canada 51 state
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#36
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

Canada 51 state

What a disaster ... just as the USA breaks into pieces, again.
 
Cliffy
#37
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Maybe, it's syphilis that's rotting his brain.

I read an article where psychologists are seriously considering that possibility.
 
White_Unifier
#38
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

I read an article where psychologists are seriously considering that possibility.

Link?
 
Jinentonix
+2
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

It just always comes down to the gay thing.
Get some help dude.

Quote:

Andrew Scheer has the answer for this.
More bag licking.

Take your own advice, asshole terrorist lover.
 
Jinentonix
+1
#40
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Y'all shoulda seen that coming when Deranged Donald declared Canada a threat to U.S. national security.

Considering Groper's welcoming of islamic terrorists and his refusal to deport them (While he deports people in record numbers who entered under the exact same circumstances as cabinet minister Maryam Monsef), I'm not surprised. Hell, I wouldn't want Canada as a neighbour with Groper running the shit show either. The idiot can't manage to do anything without stepping all over his dick in the process. He's a weak, wimpy little twerp. The ONLY country/leader he's actually tried standing up to is Trump and the US and he still managed to step all over his own dick. Sadly, Freeland managed to step all over hers too.

But ultimately it boils down to one thing. Defence. Successive Canadian govts have been more than happy to hand over the defence of Canada to the US. We're a joke. 74 years ago the Canadian army liberated Holland. The only western army to single-handedly liberate a European country during WW2. Today the Dutch could kick our asses. They're replacing their aging F-18s with F-35s. We're replacing ours with used Australian F-18s that are almost as old as what they're replacing. While Australia is buying, you guessed it, new F-35s. F-35s that the Chretien Liberals plowed $500 million into the development of at the expense of new helicopters that were desperately needed and had been ordered, only for the Liberals to scream and cry about it being the Harper govts choice of replacement.

And while the Dutch navy is smaller than Canada's, they are up-to-date and much more capable than the tubs Canada is floating. Holland's oldest ships (used mostly for training) are the same age as our only operational destroyers. Which is about 40 years. Canada has no attack choppers. Holland has a small fleet of Apaches. Even their armour is better and more up-to-date. That military parade in Holland next year to commemorate the 75th anniversary of Canada liberating them is going to be a wee bit embarrassing for us.

We have a one coast littoral navy for a nation with three ocean coasts. Christ, we don't even have any heavy ice breakers for our Arctic waters. Let alone anything seriously armed.

It's one thing to to be able to rely on the US coming to our aid if we're ever invaded, attacked, whatever. It's another thing completely to leave that defence pretty much entirely up to the US.

I know people like to delude themselves into thinking that because it's 2019, or the 21st century or whatever that we've "evolved" as a species but we haven't. There's a universal basic truth. If you can't defend what you have, or at least appear to be able to, eventually someone is going to come along and relieve you of it. Sadly, Canada has neither the ability to defend itself nor the appearance to fool anyone that it can. The ONLY thing Canada has going for it in that particular regard is its sheer size.

Ultimately, while a major stretch of the NWP is in Canadian waters, the reality is it's an international shipping lane as well. There's already enough concerns with international shipping lanes in the South China Sea with all the little artificial islands with Chinese military bases popping up. And let's face it, what is the the only country that can, would and does project their naval power to best ensure those international shipping lanes remain free and open?

As for the thread topic itself, as a proud Canadian I have to disagree with Pompeo. But as a realist with at least some grasp of geo-political realities, as much as it pains me to say it, he's not wrong.
 
Danbones
#41
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

It just always comes down to the gay thing.
Get some help dude.

There you are being a sexist, psychological projectionist as well as a racist...not to mention a communaziglobalist.

It's the HYPOCRISY and out right Canada hate ( not to mention the currency and country wrecking soros funded Trump, France, and Britain, and US hate too) that is bothering us Canadians who fund the lil bastid.
Last edited by Danbones; May 10th, 2019 at 04:15 AM..
 
Danbones
#42
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

a promiscuous heterosexual?
Like Donald Trump? ... the serial adulterer?
You won't get the dose from a porn star ... No, no, no!

At least they are consenting and of age...

Oh yeah, they call that a "stud" there Limpy.

(You must have been really hurt by girls in school I bet...and THEN you joined the navi...)
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#43
Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

At least they are consenting and of age...

Oh yeah, they call that a "stud" there Limpy.
(You must have been really hurt by girls in school I bet...and THEN you joined the navi...)

You babbling incoherently again?
 
White_Unifier
#44
Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

At least they are consenting and of age...

Oh yeah, they call that a "stud" there Limpy.
(You must have been really hurt by girls in school I bet...and THEN you joined the navi...)

'Womanizer' has never carried a positive connotation except in select morally bankrupt circles.
 
coldstream
#45
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

"The ole Monroe Doctrine " says that the exceptional Americans can do whatever the hell they want to whomever, wherever they want.
That may work for you wherever you come from but not in my country.

I suggest you read my posts before completely misconstrueing their meaning. I have never supported the Monroe Doctrine; the Pax Americana, especially in the Americas; or, the concept of Manifest Destiny. None of those can be reconciled the sovereignty of nation state of Canada, which i support, or that of America, which Trump advocates. But i don't think some his advisors, notably Pompeo or Bolton, are on the same page.
 
coldstream
#46
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

You talk about homosexuality compulsively.
Did you ever notice that?
Because everyone else has.

Well, allow me to compulse some more. I have to say my passing mention of the word in the relation to the primary topic of my post hardly comprises a compulsion. Your wild response and histrionics singling out that word just might. But since you've entered topic into the discussion.

Homosexuality

As an elective capitulation to the lowest order of sexual degeneracy and dissolution, for the individual, it is merely a tragedy that will inevitably bring on misery, isolation, disease, substance abuse, violence, suicide and, an early death.

It is however a personal choice and nothing more. It has nothing to do with genetics. Its cause might have something to do with some emotional trauma as a child or dysfunctional relationship with one parent or the other, but nothing that the human will cannot overcome. That is not an excuse. And its practice is very much a function of willful rebellion into a world of carnality and fantasy where there are no rules. And there are , however, consequences. In that way it resembles alcohol or drug addiction.

But, as an organized and aggressive ideology it is a threat to reason, order, integrity and, peace in any society. It is a ominous threat to its young people searching for a mature gender identity and to the formation of stable, procreative, families.

As it stands now the State does not merely tolerate the practice of homosexuality, as a private act between consenting adults. It is openly promoting, celebrating, normalizing, institutionalizing, sacralizing and, encouraging it. That will have the most tumultuous and disorganizing of effects on our Civilization.

This should come as no real surprise to any guys here. Because virtually all young men at some point in their lives will be the target of an unsolicited homosexual advance. That is the state of the condition. The first thing that goes with the practicing homosexual is any respect for the borders, the ethics or the personal space of others.

The natural response to a young man valiantly trying to establish an adult gender personna is one of anger. In physical altercations that can result this was once considered mitigating factor. But in our sick, distorted, society it now deemed to be an response of ‘hate’ and therefore an aggravating factor. Young men are now deemed not to have the right to protect their sexual and physical integrity. They are supposed to be ‘tolerant’, ‘understanding’, ‘diverse’ and, presumably, ‘accepting’


There! How's that for compulsive!
Last edited by coldstream; May 10th, 2019 at 11:13 AM..
 
White_Unifier
#47
Quote: Originally Posted by coldstream View Post

Well, allow me to compulse some more. I have to say my passing mention of the word in the relation to the primary topic of my post hardly comprises a compulsion. Your wild response and histrionics singling out that word just might. But since you've entered topic into the discussion.
Homosexuality
As an elective capitulation to the lowest order of sexual degeneracy and dissolution, for the individual, it is merely a tragedy that will inevitably bring on misery, isolation, disease, substance abuse, violence, suicide and, an early death.
It is however a personal choice and nothing more. It has nothing to do with genetics. Its cause might have something to do with some emotional trauma as a child or dysfunctional relationship with one parent or the other, but nothing that the human will cannot overcome. That is not an excuse. And its practice is very much a function of willful rebellion into a world of carnality and fantasy where there are no rules. And there are , however, consequences. In that way it resembles alcohol or drug addiction.
But, as an organized and aggressive ideology it is a threat to reason, order, integrity and, peace in any society. It is a ominous threat to its young people searching for a mature gender identity and to the formation of stable, procreative, families.
As it stands now the State does not merely tolerate the practice of homosexuality, as a private act between consenting adults. It is openly promoting, celebrating, normalizing, institutionalizing, sacralizing and, encouraging it. That will have the most tumultuous and disorganizing of effects on our Civilization.
This should come as no real surprise to any guys here. Because virtually all young men at some point in their lives will be the target of an unsolicited homosexual advance. That is the state of the condition. The first thing that goes with the practicing homosexual is any respect for the borders, the ethics or the personal space of others.
The natural response to a young man valiantly trying to establish an adult gender personna is one of anger. In physical altercations that can result this was once considered mitigating factor. But in our sick, distorted, society it now deemed to be an response of ‘hate’ and therefore an aggravating factor. Young men are now deemed not to have the right to protect their sexual and physical integrity. They are supposed to be ‘tolerant’, ‘understanding’, ‘diverse’ and, presumably, ‘accepting’
There! How's that for compulsive!

And how is heterosexual promiscuity any less harmful?
 
coldstream
#48
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

And how is heterosexual promiscuity any less harmful?


It can be just as destructive. It seems to be a more transient condition for most young people who sew their wild oats and go on to create monogamous, traditional families with children. Not many committed homosexuals do that.
Last edited by coldstream; May 10th, 2019 at 12:26 PM..
 
White_Unifier
#49
Quote: Originally Posted by coldstream View Post

It can be just as destructive. It seems to be a more transient condition for most young people who sew their wild oats and go on to create monogamous, traditional families with children. Not many committed homosexuals do that.

So why do you single out homosexual acts and ignore heterosexual promiscuity?
 
taxslave
#50
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

So why do you single out homosexual acts and ignore heterosexual promiscuity?

Gawd told him to?
 
Curious Cdn
#51
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

Gawd told him to?

God never mentioned it to anyone before, as far as our sacred literature tells us. Religious extremists from several faiths have confused their creeds with their tribal customs.
 
Hoid
#52
Quote: Originally Posted by White_Unifier View Post

So why do you single out homosexual acts and ignore heterosexual promiscuity?

for the same reason Walter talks about black on black crime but not white on white crime.
 
Jinentonix
#53
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

for the same reason Walter talks about black on black crime but not white on white crime.

Or for the same reason you keep stupidly screaming that Scheer is a "White natty" while you condone islamic terrorism.
 
Hoid
#54
Scheer is a white natty and nobody has ever condoned islamic terrorism
 
Cannuck
#55
Quote: Originally Posted by Jinentonix View Post

Or for the same reason you keep stupidly screaming that Scheer is a "White natty" while you condone islamic terrorism.

Nobody condones Islamic terrorism or any other terrorism. Do you go out of your way to think up stupid things?
 
Hoid
#56
 
Hoid
#57
white natty^
 
captain morgan
+1
#58
irrelevant leftard^
 
Curious Cdn
#59
Quote: Originally Posted by captain morgan View Post

irrelevant leftard^

You're back!!


I thought that yer high falutin' oil empire had gone tits up.
 
captain morgan
#60
Nope.


Looking at more production