* Accelerators* as a scientific*Sisyphus stone.*/ by Israel Socratus /


socratus
#1
* Accelerators* as a scientific*Sisyphus stone.*/ by Israel Socratus /
Accelerators* are Useless and produce Nothing for humankind.
======.
In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
This idea helped him to understand the structure of atom.
But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists
to enlarge the energy of bombarding* the target.
And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles.
And they began to bomb micro particles in the* vacuum,* in hoping
to understand their inner structure. And they were surprised with
the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of completely new
strange particles appeared. They lived a very little* time and do not
relate to our world. Our Earth needs electron and proton to create atom.
But this was forgotten.
What God carefully created, it is destroyed in accelerators.
And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner structure
of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physicist think, that an accelerator – is first of all the presence of huge energy.
And the Devil laughs. He knows, that accelerator – is first of all is the Vacuum.
But this, he has withhold from man.
He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and inexhaustible.
And in infinite vacuum* is contained an infinite variety of particles.
And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.
But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
========= .. ========.
Rutherford was right.
His followers are mistaken.
Why?
Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width and 1,20 m depth.
It is normal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree,* I shall begin to dig out a hole
* with 100* meters size and depth, will you call me a normal man?
========== .. ===============.
Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the watches
by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
Does he have many chances to success ?
As many as the scientists have who trys to understand
the inner structure of electron by breaking them into accelerators.
If not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis,
the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very economical.
For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet. What are about another
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles in
accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one (1 )
proton to create first atom, to begin to create the Nature.
All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends – antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.
===========..
The critical density of matter in the whole universe is very small
( approximately 10-26 kg/m3 )* and therefore the universe is not ''closed''
it is ''open'' -- infinite and** all the masses of galaxies exist in this infinite Vacuum.
So, instead of understand what Vacuum is,* instead to understand
''Where did electron and proton come from?''* the physicists break them in the
pieces, trying to understand their inner structure.
This is scientific Sisyphus work.*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...rticle_physics *
====================.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik** Socratus.
========================.
.
 
Curious Cdn
#2
Accelerators smash particles into smaller particles. More powerful accelerators then smash those smaller ones into even smaller ones and on it goes.

"Big fleas have little fleas on their backs to bite them and little fleas have lesser fleas
and so ad infinitum."
 
socratus
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Accelerators smash particles into smaller particles. More powerful accelerators then smash those smaller ones into even smaller ones and on it goes.

"Big fleas have little fleas on their backs to bite them and little fleas have lesser fleas
and so ad infinitum."

Somebody wrote:
''There are over 30,000 particle accelerators all over the world,
so what are they used for? ''
====
The higher* will climb Sisyphus the stone the* higher potential energy
the stone will have and then faster it will roll* down.
And if the speed of stone will be near to speed of quantum of light and
it meets another stone** then* we will have*approximately* LHC effect.
Why ''approximately'' ?
We need vacuum in order to LHC effect be punctual.
====================* .
 
darkbeaver
#4
Nothing was ever built which accellerated effortless profit to such speeds and yielded absolutly no other byproduct whatsover. Higgs should be stuffed into the breach and launched into the vaccumm. He would finally make meaningful squiggles.
 
Curious Cdn
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Somebody wrote:
''There are over 30,000 particle accelerators all over the world,
so what are they used for? ''
====
The higher* will climb Sisyphus the stone the* higher potential energy
the stone will have and then faster it will roll* down.
And if the speed of stone will be near to speed of quantum of light and
it meets another stone** then* we will have*approximately* LHC effect.
Why ''approximately'' ?
We need vacuum in order to LHC effect be punctual.
====================* .

I fantasize that each particle discovered is a complete universe and when they smash them to bits, we get to see more (of the infinite number of universes) spinning away from the impact at various angles.
 
darkbeaver
#6
quantum fizzics is a joke
 
socratus
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

quantum fizzics is a joke


Quantum physics is not a joke, the philosophy of quantum physics is a joke.

==============
 
socratus
#8
LHC and an Electron.
===
* Einstein once said :"why do we study some many particles?
Understand* what* is really an electron**would be enough."
#
Electron has six ( 6 ) formulas :
a) Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron as: E=h*f
b) Sommerfeld found the formula of an electron as : e^2=ah*c
c) Dirac found two (2) more formulas of electron’s energy:
* * * * +E=Mc^2** and* ** -E=Mc^2
d) According to QED in interaction with vacuum electron’s
energy is infinite: E= ∞
e) Electron tied with atom by the energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV
Nobody knows their unity.
#
And an* electron obeys* five (5) Laws :
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
d) Dirac - Fermi statistic
e) Maxwell - Lorentz EM theory.
Nobody explains the interactions between these laws.
#
Maybe it is better and cheaper to understand what an electron is
and later to create more powerful LHC-machine.
===================
 
socratus
#9
The CERN / LHC idea itself is wrong.
The simple atom hydrogen has one proton and one electron.
We still don't know, what an electron is and
we still don't know where the proton came from.
If we solve these two small local (electron-proton) problems,
then many things can be understood better and clearly.
#
CERN / LHC idea is like they lost ten-dollar bill ($10) and search coins
of 10 cents in order to understand where the ten-dollar bill is.
My opinion.
===============
Attached Images
We Trust.jpg (8.9 KB, 0 views )
 
Curious Cdn
#10
.. one of spilledthebeer's other personae ...
 
socratus
#11
Can the CERN-LHC project explain quantum particles ''all the way down''?
===
 
socratus
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Can the CERN-LHC project explain quantum particles ''all the way down''?
===

Physicists say they’ve found a ‘tetraquark’
July 12, 2020
---
On July 1, scientists announced the discovery of a new exotic
particle – a so-called “tetraquark” . . .
The LHCb collaboration at CERN has announced the discovery
of a new exotic particle: a so-called “tetraquark”.
The paper by more than 800 authors . . . has been presented
at a seminar. It also meets the usual statistical threshold
for claiming the discovery of a new particle
We now know that there are six different kinds of quarks –
up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom. . . . . .
---
https://earthsky.org/human-world/cer...cle-tetraquark
-----
Attached Images
tetraquark - 1.jpg (8.4 KB, 0 views )
 
socratus
#13
. . . the enormous number of new particles that
had been discovered over the past two decades.
Many physicists struggled to accept that so many
elementary particles could exist in the universe,
in what had become known as the particle zoo.
1 - We now know that there are six different
kinds of quarks – up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom.
2 - A particle made of a quark and an antiquark is called a meson . . .
3 - . . .while three quarks bound together form baryons
---------------
Gell-Mann realized that other combinations of quarks
might be possible. For example, two quarks and two
antiquarks might stick together to form a “tetraquark,”
while four quarks and an antiquark would make a “pentaquark
------------------------
4 - in 2003 . . . in Japan reported the observation
of a new meson, called X(3872), which showed
“exotic” properties quite different from ordinary mesons.
---------------------
In the following years, several new exotic particles were
discovered, and physicists started to realize that most
of these particles could only be explained successfully
if they were tetraquarks made of four quarks instead of two
---------
5 - Then, in 2015, the LHCb experiment at CERN discovered
the first pentaquark particles made of five quarks.
--------
All tetraquarks and pentaquarks that have been discovered
so far contain two charm quarks, which are relatively heavy,
and two or three light quarks – up, down or strange.
This particular configuration is indeed the easiest to discover
in experiments.
------------------
6 - But the latest tetraquark discovered by LHCb,
which has been dubbed X(6900), is composed of
four charm quarks
7 - . . . the new tetraquark was observed via its decay
into pairs of well-known particles called J/psi mesons,
each made of a charm quark and a charm antiquark.
--------
Since the discovery of the X(3872), the study of exotic particles
has thrived, with hundreds of theoretical and experimental physicists
working together to shed some light on this exciting new field.
The discovery of the new tetraquark is a huge leap forward,
and is an indication that there are still many new exotic
particles out there, waiting for someone to unveil them.
https://earthsky.org/human-world/cer...cle-tetraquark
--------
Bottom line:
If combination of a quark and an antiquark create a meson . . .
If combination of three quarks bound together form baryons . . .
If pentaquark particles made of five quarks.
If tetraquark X(6900), is composed of four charm quarks
If J/psi mesons made of a charm quark and a charm antiquark.
Then no doubt, a new combination of six quarks and six antiquarks
will create new Exotic quantum particles . . .
(but, maybe, will be discovered a seven quark and his brother antiquark?)
------------
Attached Images