LHC may have been total waste of $9 billion


darkbeaver
#1
Alternate collision method suggests LHC may have been total waste of $9 billion

Rick C. Hodgin
TG Daily
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:57 UTC


There's an article on NewScientist.com that might seem astounding. It basically states that laser-based, desktop-sized "atom smashers" could be as effective or more at probing the secrets of the universe as the $9 billion Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland, but for a tiny fraction of the cost.

The LHC is a 27 kilometer underground tunnel comprised of over $2 billion worth of equipment (some of which took 20 years of development to produce) to accelerate particles from 450 GeV to 7000 GeV. It is currently broken and will not be up and running until this coming Spring at the earliest. Moving from 450 GeV to 7000 GeV equates to a journey 17 million times around the circle (450 million kilometers) before finally reaching impact speeds.

This large size was due to the limits of the accelerating vehicle, in this case enormously powerful magnets. The idea has come to scientists, however, that it doesn't have to be big to be powerful or fast.

There's a fully technical explanation in the article, but basically the method would used plasma. In plasma, positively charged ions exist separately from negatively charged electrons (due to the extreme heat).

The team proposes shooting a high intensity laser across the plasma, which in turn pushes the electrons away. As they go away they create an "electron void" in the ion portion of the plasma which then begins to attract the electrons again once the laser is switch off. However, because they will accelerate at extreme speeds toward the ions, they will overshoot their mark creating another void.

The result is a successive series of wave-like patterns with varying electron densities. The electrons at "just the right point" will gain extreme velocity and momentum, creating a potential for desirable atom smashing effects.

This process takes place in a relatively small area, with only variations in the laser's intensity, duration and shape being required. The end result is a micro-laboratory where velocities equal to or greater than those achievable at the LHC could be created. And, for a tiny fraction of the cost.
 
hermanntrude
#2
yes let's demolish the LHC and replace it with a theoretical device which has never been built.
 
darkbeaver
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by hermanntrude View Post

yes let's demolish the LHC and replace it with a theoretical device which has never been built.

Let's not get carried away just yet Hermann. I could use some big surplus magnets and three or four hundred thousand miles of wire though. Far as I know the damn thing (LHC) is pretty much theroretical itself in that it blew a fuse first time they pressed the on button. You know what, those magnets are big enough to stick refrigerators on.
Last edited by darkbeaver; Jan 7th, 2009 at 10:49 PM..
 

Similar Threads

3
Have you ever seen a total eclipse?
by CBC News | Aug 1st, 2008
85
Harper is nothing but a total contradiction!
by Socrates the Greek | Jan 1st, 2008
23
This is total BS.
by Sublime | Mar 23rd, 2006
2
Total Dehumanization In China
by jjw1965 | Sep 24th, 2005
25
Total weirdness
by Twila | Mar 27th, 2005