Fed up with Islam Yet???


spaminator
#3181
Muslims are responsible for what ails Islam | Fatah | Columnists | Opinion | Tor
 
mentalfloss
#3182



Let's Call a Ban on Muslim Immigration What it Is: Cultural Racism

In her maiden speech to Parliament, Pauline Hanson smugly announced she was back but "not alone." Now the results are in, and it appears she was right. According to a poll released by Essential Media this week, almost 50 percent of Australians—spread across the political spectrum—would support the idea of a ban on Muslim immigration.

Even with a generous 15 percent margin of error, these numbers are phenomenal.

But Hanson's return is hardly the whole story. She may be the country's loudest public expression of anti-Muslim rhetoric, but she didn't invent these ideas. Both the Labor Party and the Liberals have been trading on the same notions of integration and security, albeit less overtly, for at least the past 15 years. What is our refugee policy built on, if not a fear of being "swamped by Muslims"?

The Liberals have long pushed the envelope on racist rhetoric while the ALP plays catchup—either duplicating Coalition policy or, at best, saying nothing to check them —creating an environment that has allowed racism to slowly metastasise.

Perhaps the only thing more depressing than Hanson's return has been the trend in "progressive" responses. The fashionable position this season is that people have "genuine fears" that need to be aired (read: legitimised).

Peter Lewis, whose company Essential ran the recent poll, basically came to this same conclusion. "How do you tell half the population that they are wrong?" he asked in an opinion piece for The Guardian.

Lewis plays a common white progressive game: It's Not Really Racism. He has a circular theory which suggests 1) you can never directly challenge racist views you don't agree with, and 2) that we have to perform some kind of Freudian magic to get to the heart of people's "true" anxieties. Half the country can't just be overtly prejudiced towards a specific racial minority, right?

Except that Lewis' own research says exactly that. The top reasons given for people's fear of Muslims are entirely related to cultural impressions—economic factors are not mentioned.

What if it's that simple? What if it's not about jobs or economic insecurity, but just a good, old-fashioned sense of cultural superiority? Is it so hard to believe that 15 years of dedicated rhetoric about Islam as an existential threat to the West, combined with relentless media coverage of Muslim minorities inciting cultural non-conformity and terrorism could lead us here?

Progressives are no more immune to this discourse than anyone else. Just last night, Dr Kerryn Phelps was on ABC's The Drum speaking about those "genuine fears." This meant talking about "cultural compatibility," while reeling off a list of vague statements about "the subjugation of women" and "female genital mutilation" without a fact or statistic in sight.

As someone who is rightly opposed to a gay marriage plebiscite on the grounds that it would open up a tsunami of hate speech and prejudicial discussions aimed at the LGBTQIA+ community, Phelps had no qualms about calmly wading into a similarly damaging conversation about the inherent threats of some imaginary homogenous Muslim culture.

Peter Lewis warns us that talking about people's racism can only make them more racist. This idea—repeated by many during the backlash against Sonia Kruger—suggests that the main thing we need to do in these situations is ensure that the feelings of racists aren't hurt by a discussion of the actual problem. It seems like in Australia you should always call a spade a spade, but never ever call racism, well, racism.

Lewis claims he's come to this conclusion after "20 years" in politics. Given his experience, I'd like to ask him to name a single movement in history that's seen racial justice achieved by avoiding actual discussions about racism.

In the wake of Brexit, Donald Trump's rise to presidential candidacy, and Hanson's return, commentators have been scrambling to explain the apparent overnight success of particularly vicious, reactionary political platforms framed around race and xenophobia.

The narrative that this can all be blamed on disaffected poor people has finally unravelled in the US, as well as the UK. As this latest Essential poll shows, polite, middle class people are totally capable of subscribing to nasty ideas in large numbers.

In Australia, where over two thirds of the population have regularly supported putting refugees in offshore concentration camps, the idea half of them are suspicious of Muslims isn't hard to believe. And there's no simple, overnight answer to a problem that has been decades in the making.

But people not having the backbone to identify and challenge growing racism is how we got here in the first place—it's not the way out.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/aamer-rahman-on

Evidently, people here don't like hearing the truth.

Lumping this into this thread kinda reveals how racist the forum is guys.


A victory for free speech.
Last edited by mentalfloss; Feb 9th, 2017 at 06:36 AM..
 
Locutus
+1
#3183
Quote: Originally Posted by Locutus View Post

The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims'


Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem


Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem

MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM

**********SO THIS LEAD TO *****************

They’re not happy in Gaza
They're not happy in Egypt
They're not happy in Libya
They're not happy in Morocco
They're not happy in Iran
They're not happy in Iraq
They're not happy in Yemen
They're not happy in Afghanistan
They're not happy in Pakistan
They're not happy in Syria
They're not happy in Lebanon
They're not happy in Nigeria
They're not happy in Kenya
They're not happy in Sudan

******** So, where are they happy? **********

They're happy in Australia
They're happy in England
They're happy in Belgium
They're happy in France
They're happy in Italy
They're happy in Germany
They're happy in Sweden
They're happy in the USA & Canada
They're happy in Norway & India

They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic! And who do they blame? Not Islam... Not their leadership... Not themselves... THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!! And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy

bump
 
Colpy
#3184
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post




Let's Call a Ban on Muslim Immigration What it Is: Cultural Racism

In her maiden speech to Parliament, Pauline Hanson smugly announced she was back but "not alone." Now the results are in, and it appears she was right. According to a poll released by Essential Media this week, almost 50 percent of Australians—spread across the political spectrum—would support the idea of a ban on Muslim immigration.

Even with a generous 15 percent margin of error, these numbers are phenomenal.

But Hanson's return is hardly the whole story. She may be the country's loudest public expression of anti-Muslim rhetoric, but she didn't invent these ideas. Both the Labor Party and the Liberals have been trading on the same notions of integration and security, albeit less overtly, for at least the past 15 years. What is our refugee policy built on, if not a fear of being "swamped by Muslims"?

The Liberals have long pushed the envelope on racist rhetoric while the ALP plays catchup—either duplicating Coalition policy or, at best, saying nothing to check them —creating an environment that has allowed racism to slowly metastasise.

Perhaps the only thing more depressing than Hanson's return has been the trend in "progressive" responses. The fashionable position this season is that people have "genuine fears" that need to be aired (read: legitimised).

Peter Lewis, whose company Essential ran the recent poll, basically came to this same conclusion. "How do you tell half the population that they are wrong?" he asked in an opinion piece for The Guardian.

Lewis plays a common white progressive game: It's Not Really Racism. He has a circular theory which suggests 1) you can never directly challenge racist views you don't agree with, and 2) that we have to perform some kind of Freudian magic to get to the heart of people's "true" anxieties. Half the country can't just be overtly prejudiced towards a specific racial minority, right?

Except that Lewis' own research says exactly that. The top reasons given for people's fear of Muslims are entirely related to cultural impressions—economic factors are not mentioned.

What if it's that simple? What if it's not about jobs or economic insecurity, but just a good, old-fashioned sense of cultural superiority? Is it so hard to believe that 15 years of dedicated rhetoric about Islam as an existential threat to the West, combined with relentless media coverage of Muslim minorities inciting cultural non-conformity and terrorism could lead us here?

Progressives are no more immune to this discourse than anyone else. Just last night, Dr Kerryn Phelps was on ABC's The Drum speaking about those "genuine fears." This meant talking about "cultural compatibility," while reeling off a list of vague statements about "the subjugation of women" and "female genital mutilation" without a fact or statistic in sight.

As someone who is rightly opposed to a gay marriage plebiscite on the grounds that it would open up a tsunami of hate speech and prejudicial discussions aimed at the LGBTQIA+ community, Phelps had no qualms about calmly wading into a similarly damaging conversation about the inherent threats of some imaginary homogenous Muslim culture.

Peter Lewis warns us that talking about people's racism can only make them more racist. This idea—repeated by many during the backlash against Sonia Kruger—suggests that the main thing we need to do in these situations is ensure that the feelings of racists aren't hurt by a discussion of the actual problem. It seems like in Australia you should always call a spade a spade, but never ever call racism, well, racism.

Lewis claims he's come to this conclusion after "20 years" in politics. Given his experience, I'd like to ask him to name a single movement in history that's seen racial justice achieved by avoiding actual discussions about racism.

In the wake of Brexit, Donald Trump's rise to presidential candidacy, and Hanson's return, commentators have been scrambling to explain the apparent overnight success of particularly vicious, reactionary political platforms framed around race and xenophobia.

The narrative that this can all be blamed on disaffected poor people has finally unravelled in the US, as well as the UK. As this latest Essential poll shows, polite, middle class people are totally capable of subscribing to nasty ideas in large numbers.

In Australia, where over two thirds of the population have regularly supported putting refugees in offshore concentration camps, the idea half of them are suspicious of Muslims isn't hard to believe. And there's no simple, overnight answer to a problem that has been decades in the making.

But people not having the backbone to identify and challenge growing racism is how we got here in the first place—it's not the way out.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/aamer-rahman-on

Evidently, people here don't like hearing the truth.

What absolute unmitigated stupidity.

Has it occurred to any of you drooling ****ing morons that just maybe, just maybe mass attacks in France, leadiong to that nation suspending civil rights for the last 15 months, mass sexual assault in Germany, attacks in Belguim, rape, an exodus of Jews, and no-go areas in Sweden hundreds dead, thousands wounded in Muslim terror attacks........has it occurred to any of you morons that the culture of Islam NEEDS to be condemned?

Last month alone:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...n_January_2017

We need to limit Muslim immigration. If we let the population pass 5% or so, we will be sorry.........look at France. Muslim population somewhere between 8 and 10 percent, French democracy destroyed.

"Progressive" idiots are suicidal.

Oh, and culture is not race, and if it was, YES I would be a proud cultural racist, as the culture of western Christian civilization is the absolute apex of human development, and the culture of Islamic ideology is way way way down the slope.
 
davesmom
+1
#3185
Regarding the OP, I was 'fed up with Islam' when I first started studying it years ago.
I have no quarrel with any faith but when it completely controls one's life as Islam does it is nothing but an obsession. I don't know how people can live with the rules of Islam which must be followed; praying 5 times a day, pilgrimage to Mecca, what hand to use to wipe your backside, forcing women into submission, depriving women from education and freedom of movement, stoning or beheading sinners, condoning child marriages, if, when and how you may cut your hair, etc., etc., etc........
No one born a Muslim can denounce Islam. Death is recommended for those who do.
Muslims should not be demonized but their religion is worthy of being demonized. Muslims who strictly adhere to their religion have to soft in the head.
 
Buffy
#3186
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister View Post

They were once, and when they were, Christianity behaved just as badly as Islam does. Islam is about 600 years younger than Christianity, and it's behaving about as Christianity did at the same age, except that it has better weapons. Modern western civilization exists in spite of religion, not because of it. Religion has resisted progress in science, the arts, and philosophy, at every turn, and it's still trying.

It's not that long ago that people like Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Victor Stenger, et al, and me (not that I consider myself part of that distinguished company) would have been tortured and executed for what they've said and written. Read Barbara Tuchman's A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century, to get a feel for how the Christian church wielded its secular power 600 years ago.

Dexter, do your homework. Western civilization exists specifically because of Christianity.
 
bluebyrd35
#3187
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

Regarding the OP, I was 'fed up with Islam' when I first started studying it years ago.
I have no quarrel with any faith but when it completely controls one's life as Islam does it is nothing but an obsession. I don't know how people can live with the rules of Islam which must be followed; praying 5 times a day, pilgrimage to Mecca, what hand to use to wipe your backside, forcing women into submission, depriving women from education and freedom of movement, stoning or beheading sinners, condoning child marriages, if, when and how you may cut your hair, etc., etc., etc........
No one born a Muslim can denounce Islam. Death is recommended for those who do.
Muslims should not be demonized but their religion is worthy of being demonized. Muslims who strictly adhere to their religion have to soft in the head.

You might just do a bit of research, There is very little difference between the beliefs of Christianity and Islam. Here is a reasonable site for both sides.

Islam vs Christianity

Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Muslims are responsible for what ails Islam | Fatah | Columnists | Opinion | Tor

Yup, just as Christians are responsible as to how Christians are perceived!!

It all comes down to how advanced and enlightened any individual is, as to how that person perceives a Supreme Being to be.
 
davesmom
#3188
"You might just do a bit of research, There is very little difference between the beliefs of Christianity and Islam. Here is a reasonable site for both sides"


That is simply ridiculous. There is no comparison of what Jesus taught and the inconsistent ramblings of Mohammed. And I have done research. Maybe YOU should do some research.
 
bluebyrd35
#3189
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

"You might just do a bit of research, There is very little difference between the beliefs of Christianity and Islam. Here is a reasonable site for both sides"


That is simply ridiculous. There is no comparison of what Jesus taught and the inconsistent ramblings of Mohammed. And I have done research. Maybe YOU should do some research.

I have done and if you read the bible you would have too,, Jesus said " I come not to change the law but enforce it, " The law in Jesus's time was the Jewish law of the Old testament, So, all research comes back to those two books. Furthermore, we no longer stone witches, kill all those who do not believe in that version of God, Also, no longer do most people believe that the human race began with Adam and Eve as the Old Testament says it does, There were other humans in existence during the time of the "Garden of Eden" as was clearly indicated in the Old Testament or "The Law according to Jesus," Adam & Eve"s off-spring did not mate with their own siblings,

So, believe as you wish but do NOT tell others their views must be yours. Try to be reasonable in your belief and allow others theirs


Even in today's world there is a very legitimate reason for having both testaments comprising the Christian bible, How Christianity has evolved is mostly due to a softening of the old Jewish laws1! Try looking at the Gnostic Gospels with a view to how the modern view of Christianity has evolved despite the efforts of the early church.
Last edited by bluebyrd35; Feb 9th, 2017 at 11:08 PM..
 
Locutus
#3190


oh, and...


Katewerk ‏@katewerk
Normal people ask, "They needed to be paid to do this?"

Muslim group rejects federal grant to fight extremism

Fourth Muslim group rejects federal grant to fight extremism | The Sacramento Bee
 
Ludlow
#3191
I wonder how anyone can take anothers life in the name of a god with no feelings of remorse.
 
Locutus
#3192
They needed to be paid to do this? Interesting.
 
bluebyrd35
+1
#3193
Quote: Originally Posted by Ludlow View Post

I wonder how anyone can take anothers life in the name of a god with no feelings of remorse.

Remember the Inquisition? The Catholic church (Christian) did that!! Don't think those Christians had much remorse,

Quote: Originally Posted by Locutus View Post

They needed to be paid to do this? Interesting.

It seems they don't!! Please note they refused payment.
 
Curious Cdn
#3194
Quote: Originally Posted by Ludlow View Post

I wonder how anyone can take anothers life in the name of a god with no feelings of remorse.

http://youtu.be/LJfJPxLntZU

Oh sorry. Those are GOOD GUY killers.
 
Buffy
-1
#3195
Islam is a vile, vicious social and political pathology masquerading as a religion. Every country has the right and obligation to excise a malignant pathology from the body politic before it metastasizes.
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#3196
Quote: Originally Posted by Buffy View Post

Islam is a vile, vicious social and political pathology masquerading as a religion. Every country has the right and obligation to excise a malignant pathology from the body politic before it metastasizes.

Let's add Scientology and the Branch Davidians to your list.
 
pgs
#3197
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Remember the Inquisition? The Catholic church (Christian) did that!! Don't think those Christians had much remorse,


It seems they don't!! Please note they refused payment.

Please explain in detail some highlights as to what and who the inquisition was ? My history of Moor's and Spain is a little shaky .
Is the inquisition still happening and is it condoned by the church hierarchy ?
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#3198
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Please explain in detail some highlights as to what and who the inquisition was ? My history of Moor's and Spain is a little shaky .
Is the inquisition still happening and is it condoned by the church hierarchy ?

Two groups of my forebears came to he New World, escaping genocidal religious persecution ... Anabaptists from Switzerland ± and Huegenots .. French Protestants. Ever wonder why there aren-t many Protestants in France?

Neither had anything to do with the inquisition. The first group were forced out of Europe at the end of the Thirty Years War and the Second group were persecuted by Cardinal Richelieu.

The early history of European settlement has a lot of similar stories associated with it. The Puritan Pilgrims that landed at Plymouth Mass.were religious refugees and there were plenty of others.
 
bluebyrd35
+1
#3199
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Please explain in detail some highlights as to what and who the inquisition was ? My history of Moor's and Spain is a little shaky .
Is the inquisition still happening and is it condoned by the church hierarchy ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition. This explains the reasons and extent of that period of time, It was a growing period of Christianity, much like Islam is going through these days. At least we do not throw Muslims into an arena of lions. However, some Christian nations believe in water-boarding still, Religions in my own opinion, are misused. I am never going to be sure, if any religion was designed to elevate humans or to control them or if it was invented by humans or for elevating the species,

All any of us can do is to choose the form of belief that, in our individual opinion, will elevate ourselves in the most agreeable manner possible,
 
pgs
#3200
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Two groups of my forebears came to he New World, escaping genocidal religious persecution ... Anabaptists from Switzerland ± and Huegenots .. French Protestants. Ever wonder why there aren-t many Protestants in France?

Neither had anything to do with the inquisition. The first group were forced out of Europe at the end of the Thirty Years War and the Second group were persecuted by Cardinal Richelieu.

The early history of European settlement has a lot of similar stories associated with it. The Puritan Pilgrims that landed at Plymouth Mass.were religious refugees and there were plenty of others.

Great now please the Catholics and inquisition .

Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition. This explains the reasons and extent of that period of time, It was a growing period of Christianity, much like Islam is going through these days. At least we do not throw Muslims into an arena of lions. However, some Christian nations believe in water-boarding still, Religions in my own opinion, are misused. I am never going to be sure, if any religion was designed to elevate humans or to control them or if it was invented by humans or for elevating the species,

All any of us can do is to choose the form of belief that, in our individual opinion, will elevate ourselves in the most agreeable manner possible,

Wow so you admit you know nothing of the inquisition , yet you use it as a means to denigrate Catholics .
 
Locutus
#3201
1400 yrs of Islam history in a few minutes...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guXBTgAxhIw
 
Mowich
+2
#3202
Quote: Originally Posted by Buffy View Post

Islam is a vile, vicious social and political pathology masquerading as a religion. Every country has the right and obligation to excise a malignant pathology from the body politic before it metastasizes.

Every country has the right to excise malignant, racist, Islamophobic creeps like you from their midst - and the sooner the better.
 
JLM
+2
#3203
Quote: Originally Posted by Buffy View Post

Islam is a vile, vicious social and political pathology masquerading as a religion. Every country has the right and obligation to excise a malignant pathology from the body politic before it metastasizes.


You may want to refrain from tarring them all with the same brush. There's many who aren't like the ones who perpetrated 9/11.
 
JLM
#3204
Quote: Originally Posted by Cannuck View Post

Sniff


What a TWIT!

Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

Regarding the OP, I was 'fed up with Islam' when I first started studying it years ago.
I have no quarrel with any faith but when it completely controls one's life as Islam does it is nothing but an obsession. I don't know how people can live with the rules of Islam which must be followed; praying 5 times a day, pilgrimage to Mecca, what hand to use to wipe your backside, forcing women into submission, depriving women from education and freedom of movement, stoning or beheading sinners, condoning child marriages, if, when and how you may cut your hair, etc., etc., etc........
No one born a Muslim can denounce Islam. Death is recommended for those who do.
Muslims should not be demonized but their religion is worthy of being demonized. Muslims who strictly adhere to their religion have to soft in the head.


Not an unreasonable summarization!
 
Locutus
#3205
Truth Bombers ‏@Truth_Bombers
Canadian Premier Kathleen Wynne visited mosque to deliver speech on equality of women & diversity. She was forced to sit in the back alone.





 
Buffy
#3206
Quote: Originally Posted by Mowich View Post

Every country has the right to excise malignant, racist, Islamophobic creeps like you from their midst - and the sooner the better.

You might consider that you don't know what you're talking about. Not even the faintest clue. By the way, there is no such thing as Islamophobia because there is no fear of Islam that is irrational.
 
Durry
#3207
Quote: Originally Posted by Buffy View Post

You might consider that you don't know what you're talking about. Not even the faintest clue. By the way, there is no such thing as Islamophobia because there is no fear of Islam that is irrational.

Yeah, this makes a lit of sense, just wish I understood what you are trying to say. Been in the USA long?
 
darkbeaver
#3208
Quote: Originally Posted by Locutus View Post

1400 yrs of Islam history in a few minutes...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guXBTgAxhIw

aCRASH COURSE, i ENJOYED IT, A GREAT SPEAKER. BUT
 
Buffy
+1
#3209
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

You may want to refrain from tarring them all with the same brush. There's many who aren't like the ones who perpetrated 9/11.

Yes, but they are not able to interfere with another's jihad. The "highest"? form of jihad is violent jihad. Those are the ones that get the virgins, and boys, and wine..........Ever wonder why there is rarely any serious condemnation of violence from the locals? They don't have so much of a problem with it and they prefer to stay alive. And they prefer Sharia. And they know that ultimately they will assimilate us because of suicidal knumbskulls like you.

Quote: Originally Posted by Durry View Post

Yeah, this makes a lit of sense, just wish I understood what you are trying to say. Been in the USA long?

I've lived in several Islamic societies. I have had the distinction of having human excrement thrown in my face because I had the temerity to walk down the street with another woman who like myself was not accompanied by a man. I know of what I speak and you don't. It's always a good thing to inform oneself before getting opinionated.
 
Durry
#3210
Quote: Originally Posted by Buffy View Post

. And they prefer Sharia. And they know that ultimately they will assimilate us because of suicidal knumbskulls like you.

These useless scum won't and can't assimilate anybody here. Totally useless and stupid.
 

Similar Threads

45
What Is Islam?
by ahmadabdalrhman | Jun 9th, 2018
1
Islam in the UK
by I think not | Jan 17th, 2007