Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid
I see many convictions based on racism.
You SHOULD BE dragged in CHAINS........................................
into the nearest Human Rights Kangaroo Court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
And should be harrased and persecuted to the FULL EXTENT of LIE-beral BIGOTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is not just in United States that LIE-beral BIGOTRY rears its head!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is an article making a logical point- that will be scorned by bigoted LIE-berals who believe THEY are the only people in the world who have any right to be offended by anything! With some comments of my own in brackets):
If a judge can’t wear a MAGA hat, a public servant shouldn’t wear a niqab
BY ANTHONY FUREY, POSTMEDIA NETWORK
FIRST POSTED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2017 05:19 PM EDT. UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2017 05:30 PM EDT
This file photo taken on January 20, 2017 shows hats displayed for sale on the morning of Donald Trump's inauguration as the 45th President of the United States in Washington, DC. A misconduct hearing opened on August 23, 2017 into a Canadian judge's wearing of a "Make America Great Again" campaign cap in court the day after Donald Trump was elected US president last November. Judges in Canada are forbidden from expressing partisan political views as a way of ensuring the appearance of their independence. Ontario Court Justice Bernd Zabel said wearing the red cap bearing Trump's campaign slogan was meant as a dig at colleagues who had supported Trump's rival for the US presidency, Hillary Clinton. (MOLLY RILEY/AFP/Getty Images)
(LIE-berals object to civil servants making partisan views known? Who would have guessed that as they have been ignoring very partisan attack ads by civil service Hog unions for years! LIE-beral hypocrisy dictates that if the partisan is in their favour then it is NOT partisan! WE all recognize that women who wear the hijab- and the men who order this clothing- ALL hold VERY PARTISAN religious views! So why is it bad for a Cdn judge to support an ELECTED leader in the United States DEMOCRACY while hijab wearers support the destruction of democratic Israel and the expulsion of Jews- AND want us to join with terror groups such as Hamas and Hezzbollah to attack Jews and Yankees? With the added bonus that as numbers of Muslims in Canada rise- there is a corresponding INCREASE in anti Semitic hate crimes here in Canada as well!)
Regardless of one’s politics, pretty much everyone agrees that Justice Bernd Zabel shouldn’t have worn a Make America Great Again hat in his Hamilton, Ontario courtroom the day after the U.S. presidential election.
Last week, Zabel faced a disciplinary panel to answer for his unofficial wardrobe choice.
He said it was all a joke at the hearing, but had previously said he wanted to stick it to all the Hillary Clinton supporters in his workplace.
Love Trump. Hate Trump. It doesn’t matter. As the Americans say, justice should be blind. Let’s keep the politics out of it.
And while we’re at it, let’s talk about applying this principle consistently across the public service, whenever Canadians interact with their government.
We’re pretty good at it in most respects. It’s not like polling clerks on election day are allowed to wear buttons supporting candidates. Police officers, firefighters and other law enforcement have their uniforms. We run a tight ship.
(No- they don’t wear political buttons on election day but civil service Hogs DO get into a HUGE conflict of interest with their LIE-beral friendly ads and sneering attacks on Conservative politicians at election time! It’s a blatant and glaring conflict of interest that Ontari-owe LIE-berals are only now beginning to rein in- in a small way as Hogs grow frustrated with LIE-beral failure to honour the MASSIVE, economy breaking IOU`s that LIE-berals have offered in exchange for Hog support inv the past but have not yet paid for - in a nice exchange for more gravy from LIE-berals!)
But still, the Quebec government felt it needed to go one step further to codify some form of this into law. Not for overt political displays this time, but religion.
Bill 62, which is supported by the governing Quebec Liberals and now working its way through committee, calls for a “duty of religious neutrality” on the part of all public servants.
(The Niqab is certainly a powerful statement of a particular political opinion! It is most commonly worn by women who too often have a hostility to western democracy and social standards! Thus it IS offensive to many Cdns in the same way that a Nazi swastika infuriates Jews or a burning Klan Kross insults black people!)
That effectively means a ban on face coverings, the most prominent of which is the niqab.
(There is also logic in banning the niqab for security reasons as no self respecting jihadist jerk would wish to bring his female `property` to Canada if they would have to walk the streets immodestly dressed just like Cdn “sluts”! WE might be able to weed out some security threats simply by clarifying our dress code?)
This has become an issue in the NDP leadership race, of all places, where the party is hoping to woo back those voters Jack Layton first enticed in the 2011 election but that Justin Trudeau won back in 2015.
Quebec politics is an entirely different scene. There you have voters who would strongly support both the NDP and niqab bans, the sort of blend that wouldn’t happen in Anglo NDP strongholds like Toronto and Vancouver.
The candidates are divided. Guy Caron, from Quebec, is OK with the bill.
But Ontario’s Jagmeet Singh calls it Islamophobic and Niki Ashton posted on social media: “You can’t tell a woman what she should be wearing.”
(Yeah you can tell a woman what to wear! Its done all the time in work places where a certain standard of appearance is required! You KNOW they ain’t going to hire a Muslim woman dressed in traditional costume at Hooters for rather obvious reasons! We routinely regulate how much clothing a woman may strip off in a business setting such as a stripper bar- and we regulate WHERE this activity may take place along with limitations on what manner of interaction will be permitted between naked strippers and drunk bar patrons! We reserve the right to tell a woman she cannot wear a swastika and we ban the public use of certain words such as “nigger” so why not ban the niqab as an equally offensive religious symbol? It would even be an aid to our national security as Muslim radicals would be less likely to emigrate with their women to Canada if the women were legally required to appear in public in an indecent state- just like Cdn sluts!)
(LIE-berals are spinning themselves in circles as they struggle to PRETEND that there is a separation between religious freedom and political freedom in the twisted minds of Muslim Jihadists!)