#metoo

spilledthebeer
#91
Here is a sign of the moral rot that has infected our legal system-with some comments of my own in brackets): Law Society tribunal lawyer calls sex assault 'minor offence'. By Michele Mandel, Toronto Sun. First posted: Friday, April 28, 2017 07:20 PM EDT | Updated: Saturday, April 29, 2017 09:59 AM EDT Raj Anand is not only a lawyer but the former Chief Commissioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission — so you’d think he’d know better. So why did the vice-chair of the Law Society of Upper Canada tribunal make several disturbing comments that appeared to minimize a sexual assault complaint while deciding whether paralegal Nephat Siziba should be suspended? “The motion arose out of an allegation that while acting as an Uber driver on September 23, the paralegal took the hand of his female passenger (the passenger) and initiated sexual contact with her,” Anand wrote in reasons released last month. Police alleged Siziba, 55, sexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman during a 4 a.m. Uber ride from Thornhill to Toronto. After she complained to Uber, he was suspended for a week while they investigated. “We were informed that the paralegal resumed driving for Uber, but resolved not to pick up intoxicated passengers.” The woman then went to police and the driver was charged with sexual assault. Siziba, who has no criminal record and stated he will vigorously defend himself against the allegations, is free on bail under conditions he not work as an Uber or taxi driver. (WE will never know what really happened between driver and passenger. Maybe driver is a sexual predator seeking out drunken passengers as easier prey? Or maybe she is the villain. From my own experience in the taxi business I can state that the VAST MAJORITY of people in a taxi at 4am are drunks, pimps, hookers and drug dealers! And it is not unusual for a few women to offer to `pay` for the ride with sexual services. Perhaps driver decided passenger was too skanky to be appealing and this offended passenger-and prompted the complaint by the woman scorned? We will NEVER KNOW!) But could he still work as a paralegal? The Law Society urged the tribunal to suspend Siziba’s licence while his charge is pending. Lawyer Amanda Worley said the optics were terrible: “The fact he was charged with a sexual offence against a vulnerable young woman harms the public’s confidence in the integrity of the legal profession and the ability of the Law Society to govern the profession in the public interest.” (A sexual assault charge is not a laughing matter but in this case with NO EVIDENCE other than the word of a passenger who may have been trying to weasel out of full payment of the fare-the seriousness of the offense sinks to insignificance. Your old Granny would tell you that a woman who goes out late at night intoxicated- as this passenger apparently was- is inviting trouble! And Granny is probably RIGHT!) Anand and the two others on his panel ultimately refused to suspend Siziba. Instead, in remarks reminiscent of several controversial judges in recent news, the vice-chair seemed to blame the complainant and downplay the allegations. “I think boiled down to its essence, you have obviously contested evidence about what took place over a matter of a few minutes,” Anand said in a transcript obtained by the Sun. (Apparently there was no blood shed .no physical marks, no indication of any trauma-and with such a total lack of evidence of real injury what can a judge do but dismiss the case for lack of evidence. Our courts are jammed with more serious cases with too many of them dropped due to the length of time it takes to get to trial-and here we are wasting time and money on a matter of NO importance since it is unprovable and unresolvable- with NO evidence and NO chance of reaching a fair verdict for EITHER driver or passenger!) (The ugly truth is that the bigoted LIE-beral version of justice simply assumes all men are probably rapists AND GUILTY unless strong contrary evidence is supplied! LIE-berals do not want to offend feminazis by promoting tales of woman as instigator or trouble maker seeking to weasel out of payment or hooker! In this case what 55 year old man would assume a 20 year old girl would find him attractive? Unless he was offering a very nice wad of cash? “Obviously, sexual assault is serious in principle. But it is a relatively minor offence compared to some of the other criminal conduct that is referenced in some of the other cases, like viewing child pornography or something like that.” (We accept that a woman is not a plaything to be handled whenever a guy wants to -but the total lack of evidence in this case- and evidence that she was drunk and mandates dropping the case- and advising the passenger NOT to be wandering around-drunk and stupid at 4am. There is something STRONG to be said for in car cameras to record events and to provide protection AND EVIDENCE for all involved!) “You have no evidence other than the fact that the charge is made, essentially. Obviously, the complainant said something to the police. We don’t actually know what she said to the police,” he continued. “The question is, really: By virtue of being charged with this offence, is that enough for (Siziba) to be suspended indefinitely?” (Clearly suspending Siziba from his paralegal job would be a cruel and unusual punishment for a crime he cannot be proven guilty of since there is no evidence.) Did he actually say “it is a relatively minor offence?” Tell that to the young woman. After the recent “knees together” and “drunks can consent” judgments, it seems that once again, the law doesn’t take sexual assault as seriously as it should. (Deplorable comments made by a few old fossil judges who are frustrated by the stream of hung over females entering their courts to complain about guys touching their thighs should not be allowed to influence cases where there is NO evidence!) When reached by the Sun, Anand said he wasn’t in a position to address any criticism. “I don’t think I’m able to comment as an adjudicator.” The law society’s lawyer was obviously struggling with Anand’s remarks. “I am not sure I would agree with you that it is a relatively minor offence. It is predatory in nature. The victim was confined to a vehicle,” Worley said during the hearing. (A vehicle that she SUMMONED for her service and for which she would have to pay-and it`s a costly ride from Thornhill-again I ask if this complaint is not simply part of a negotiation ploy by the female to avoid paying full fare? With no proof 9of anything- how serious can it all be? LOE-berals can be as hostile as they plese and it will not conjure up a SINGLE logical fact!) “So I think we have to be careful not to sort of make judgment calls about comparing this offence to this offence. If you are satisfied that it does present a risk, then you need to act,” she insisted. “We cannot diminish the seriousness of allegations of sexual assault.” Yet Anand seemed to do just that: “I am just saying that here we have simply a sort of “he said, she said” at this point.” (A “sort of he said, she said”? Who is there AVAILABLE to this case who can say ANYTHING except he said and she said? And how would the public react if lawyers tried to compare a momentary hand on a thigh to the gory details of a genuine rape?) How would the public feel knowing they did nothing to protect the public? asked Worley. (I ask again how the public can be protected by a witch hunt with no evidence? Certainly NO MAN will be safe if such witch hunts become common! Unless you are prepared to dismiss all males as not being part of the public? What about our right not to be harassed by vindictive women with false stories-using the politically correct legal system as a weapon?) The optics didn’t trouble the tribunal. They found “no reasonable grounds to believe there was significant risk” to the public, or to the administration of justice. They dismissed the law society’s motion to suspend Sizibo’s licence and said the public would be satisfied with his offer to work under supervision in his son’s law office and not provide legal services or meet with clients alone. That may be so. But how do they feel about the tribunal’s vice-chair minimizing the seriousness of an alleged sexual assault? (That the tribunal minimized the seriousness of the alleged assault is NOT evidence of contempt for women-it is an open acknowledgment THAT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY CRIME! Statements to the contrary are a form of sexist dictatorship!) (And how does the public feel about a vindictive woman possibly using the courts to get out of paying an Uber fare? We don’t know and cannot honestly find out what happened so the witch hunt is discriminatory if it goes any further-throw it out since it is beneath the attention of the court which has MUCH BIGGER fish to fry with more serious criminals anyway!)
 
Twin_Moose
+2
#92
Woman who made false rape claim gets 1 year in jail

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world...cid=spartanntp
 
Mowich
#93
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Woman who made false rape claim gets 1 year in jail

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world...cid=spartanntp


"Judge William Holden said he hoped Yovino would spend her jail time contemplating her actions. Prosecutor Tatiana Messina said Yovino's crimes were a "disservice" to true sexual assault victims, who often are not believed."


That they are and this should be a lesson to all those #metoo groupies who have piled onto the movement without so much as a whit of thought towards eventual criminal investigations that could very well see their lies exposed and true justice meted out.
 
spilledthebeer
+4
#94
A year in jail for a woman who perjured herself in a rape case? GOOD STUFF!!!!! Too many women regard our courts as a handy way to legally harass men! Some years back- Toronto woman with a drinking problem moved in with a guy who had an apartment near Parkdale. She accuses the guy of rape and he spends 18 months in jail waiting for results of cop investigation. He loses all his stuff, car, tv, clothes, the apartment etc. Turns out the witch had gone drinking in a bar. Then had sex with two guys in a van. Then staggers home to boyfriend who blows up and wants her GONE! AT THAT POINT- not waiting to lose her handy apartment home and enraged at losing her gravy supply guy - she accuses the guy of RAPE! Cops eventually expose her as a liar and the guy is released! Yeah- just a legal shrug and apology: sorry guy, we had to investigate. Too bad you could not afford bail"! She LIES! And he PAYS!
 
Mowich
+2
#95
When #MeToo advocates face their own fall from grace

For a long time there has been concern that the Me Too movement went too far in portraying men as monsters. But several recent events have shown that the movement was just as misguided in turning women into flawless paragons of virtue.

After accusing Harvey Weinstein of rape, Asia Argento became one of the main faces of Me Too. But last week the movement was rocked when actor and musician Jimmy Bennett accused Argento of sexually assaulting him when he was 17 and she was 37.

Argento denied all the charges, including having any sexual relationship with Bennett and, in a statement to reporter Yashar Ali, claimed her late boyfriend Anthony Bourdain actually made the payments to the cash-strapped Bennett because he was “afraid of the possible negative publicity” and to “not suffer any future intrusions in our life.”

Fellow Weinstein victims were careful about condemning Argento. Rose McGowan, one of the most outspoken heroes of the movement, tweeted “None of us know the truth of the situation, and I’m sure more will be revealed.

Be gentle.” Mira Sorvino tweeted a statement describing herself as “heartsick” over the accusations and noting that “perhaps she [Argento] will be exonerated.” It was hard not to notice that men who were similarly accused did not get the benefit of the doubt from these women.

Following Argento’s denial, pictures surfaced showing her and Bennett in bed together. She has not made any further comment.

The same week, the 2018 winner of the Miss America pageant, Cara Mund, accused Gretchen Carlson of bullying her.

“Our chair and CEO have systematically silenced me, reduced me, marginalized me and essentially erased me in my role as Miss America in subtle and not-so-subtle ways on a daily basis,” Mund said.

Two other Miss America winners also joined in her complaint. Like Argento, Carlson was a trailblazer in the Me Too movement. Her sexual-harassment accusation against then Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes was the first of many and ultimately forced his resignation. The idea that a Me Too leader would nevertheless be terrible to other women caught people by surprise.

The accusations against Carlson are reminiscent of those against writer Junot Diaz. Like Carlson, Diaz was not accused of any sexual offenses but still was caught up in the Me Too whirlwind for being generally terrible to women. Diaz had told his own story, of being molested as a child, but that didn’t inoculate him from scorn when allegations of his bad behavior broke. But that’s been the problem with the Me Too movement from the start. It set up a stark contrast of good (women) versus evil (men) and leaves no room for middle ground. No one could live up to those caricatures. With every new accusation came a chorus of shock that our favorite actors, writers, broadcasters could behave in such a vile way.

“Not him!” people exclaimed. This was immediately followed by the suggestion that “everyone,” meaning men, was capable of being a harasser. But the idea that there is only one type of person that is capable of sexual harassment or assault is ludicrous. Similarly, the idea that all men, and only men, are capable of bad behavior, even specifically bad sexual behavior, is also absurd. Some men would never behave like JunotDiaz much less Harvey Weinstein, yet men were tarred with a wide brush when the accusations were rolling in while women were spared from scrutiny.

The charges against these women have nothing to do with what happened to them. But what happened to them also can’t be used as an excuse for their bad actions. These allegations expose something that Me Too had previously obscured. There are no perfect people. People aren’t all good like the accusers have been portrayed, or all bad like the accused. The lack of gray area is what makes the movement so unsustainable. No one is purely virtuous or evil and when the Me Too mob moved beyond sexual assault or harassment to general misconduct toward women it was inevitable that some of the heroes of the movement were going to get caught up in the net.

For the accused men of Me Too, the public judgment was swift and recovery nearly impossible. The women are getting a softer landing, so far.

A good result of this moment would be a permanent reduction of the delirium that follows every charge. The main figures of the movement could lead the way on that and show they care about hearing the whole story even when the accused is not a woman they know. They could show the same “gentleness” toward men — and bring a saner approach to what has become a hysterical frenzy.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/25/when-m...ll-from-grace/
 
Curious Cdn
#96
Well, Mowich. They did break the monopoly in Hollywood in which young women had to trade their bodies for decent parts in movies. Maybe, the fix is just temporary but we've moved in the right direction, for now..
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#97
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Well, Mowich. They did break the monopoly in Hollywood in which young women had to trade their bodies for decent parts in movies. Maybe, the fix is just temporary but we've moved in the right direction, for now..


================================================== ================================================== ====


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


CuriousCdn is FOOLISH ENOUGH to think that casting couch calls have been ended now that Weinstein has been accused!!!!!!!!!!!!


The reality is that people will just be more CAREFUL about how the offer is made!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Consider this article:


Here is an article illustrating just how ugly and twisted are the Feminazi and LIE-beral values now guiding much of our society! With some comments of my own in brackets):

Feminist scholar accused of sexually harassing, stalking male student

From Associated Press. Published: August 16, 2018. Updated: August 16, 2018 9:51 PM EDT

Filed Under: Toronto SUN/ News/ World


NEW YORK — A former New York University graduate student has sued a prominent professor, alleging she turned his dream of working with a world-class scholar “into more than three years of continuous and unabated sexual harassment, sexual assault and stalking.”

The lawsuit was filed by Nimrod Reitman in state Supreme Court in Manhattan on Wednesday against the university and professor Avital Ronell. It said NYU failed to take action after Reitman told a vice provost about the misconduct while he was still a student.

(The LIE-beral mindset is incapable of accepting a woman as aggressor- in their biased eyes- it is only men who are WRONG! One has only to think of how NDPers in the Bob Rae govt treated the vicious Karla Homolka as a “battered wife” even AFTER the sex torture videos and additional information about how she procured victims for hubby Paul Bernardo- victims including her own sister- who died during the abuse- surfaced!)

(In the early stages, the case against Bernardo was weak and NDP prosecutors did their deal with Homolka- on the condition she give FULL DISCLOSURE of all details- which she could not do without incriminating herself! So she LIED- and was then exposed when the tapes were found!)

(But NDP Feminazis STAYED with their deal with the Homolka devil- ijsisting alternately that they still needed her for her evidence- and that was a lie- the tapes were graphicly clear about guilt! And NDP also insisted that Homlka was a “battered wife” under Bernardo`s control- but the tapes and her admitting willingess to be the key to capturing victims provers she acted of her own free will- yet NDPers defend their HYPOCRITE deal with Homolk to this day!)

Last summer, two years after Reitman graduated, he made a formal complaint, and the university opened an investigation.

The staff of NYU’s Title IX office took Reitman’s reports of sexual misconduct “very seriously,” university spokesman John Beckman said. It concluded Reitman was a victim of sexual harassment and suspended Ronell for a year while determining that any meetings she has with students in the future must be supervised, he said.

(Uh huh......for 3 years the guy complains and only after the lawyers are called in does anything much happen! And the guy moved from Berlin to New York specifically to work with professor Ronell- and should we ask if it was possible for the guy to shift to work with some other professor after he discovered Ronell was a horn dog? Or would Ronell have given a BAD progress report on Reitman to any other professor considering working with Reitman- thus discouraging the transfer- unless the University stepped in- which apparently DID NOT HAPPEN till AFTER he graduated?)

“We have tried to work with Mr. Reitman to help him put this unfortunate chapter behind him, and we are sympathetic to what he has been through,” Beckman said in a statement. “However, given the promptness, seriousness, and thoroughness with which we responded to his charges, we do not believe that his filing a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the University would be warranted or just.”

(AS we have seen with other Universities- at Wilfred Laurier- over the playing of a Jordan Peterson tape in class; and at Ryerson - over its refusal to let a Jewish student do field placement work that was required to graduate, with a Jewish charity- the staff focus is on COVERING UP embarrassing issues- not airing them publicly!)

Beckman said the university was still investigating whether he was retaliated against and “additional sanctions” were possible.

(Oh! So gthe university ins “investigating possible retaliation” In other words IT IS POSSIBLE that the professor/woman scorned, might have used her credentials as senior professor to damage student Reitman`s career- hence the lawsuit!)

Ronell didn’t respond to an email from The Associated Press on Thursday. But earlier this week, before the lawsuit was filed, she told The New York Times that she didn’t harass Reitman.

“Our communications — which Reitman now claims constituted sexual harassment — were between two adults, a gay man and a queer woman, who share an Israeli heritage, as well as a penchant for florid and campy communications arising from our common academic backgrounds and sensibilities,” she said. “These communications were repeatedly invited, responded to and encouraged by him over a period of three years.”

The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, says Reitman suffered humiliation, reputational harm, mental anguish and physical distress.

(So who knows the truth here? The university seems to have decided that there was abuse- since they suspended Ronell FOR A YEAR! So it seems WE SHOULD ask if Reitmans career was damaged- and by how much?)

(But HERE IS THE LEGAL KEY for this law suit- it will be decided on the basis of REAL EVIDENCE- unlike the “he said and she said” garbage at the heart of the Judge Kavanaugh and Blaisey Ford CRAP!!!)

(The ugly truth is that Feminazis are trying to create a culture where all that is needed to convict a man is for a woman to make accusation! LIE-berals are aiding and abetting a pack of radicals working to ERODE our civil rights and legal protections for their own selfish FASCIST reasons!)
 
Mowich
+1
#98
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Well, Mowich. They did break the monopoly in Hollywood in which young women had to trade their bodies for decent parts in movies. Maybe, the fix is just temporary but we've moved in the right direction, for now..

"....young women had to trade their bodies...". Actually, CC they made a choice to put the advancement of their careers over their own safety. Did Weinstein take advantage of them? He may have, but........had they not made the wrong choice in the first place, he would not have been able to do so. There are women who were not comfortable with the guy and they choose to walk away rather than take a chance that he may have ulterior motives when inviting them to hotel rooms etc.

I think Weinstein is a creep. He may very well be guilty of the accusations made against him. In the absence of validated testimony to date, it is yet another 'he said, she said' controversy. Hopefully, the up coming court case will reveal the truth.
 
Hoid
#99
There are literally dozens of accusations against Weinstein

At the best it is he said, they said
 
Mowich
#100
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

There are literally dozens of accusations against Weinstein

At the best it is he said, they said


There are, Hoid and yet not one has been proven in a court of law.............so as I mentioned before, the trial should clear up all the questions about what exactly took place and what didn't.
 
MHz
#101
Good reason to waterboard everybody in Hollywierd and compare notes after.
 
B00Mer
#102


Leading #MeToo sexual harassment campaigner accused of groping man

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8202766.html
 
petros
+1
#103
There is a simple solution to avoid women or men for that matter using accusation to destroy a person's credibility, if a person is being investigated or charged with sexual assault no names should be made public until there is a conviction.

This takes away the power of a false accuser and protects the credibility of the of the person falsely accused.

There is no recourse in the court of public opinion for those falsely accused.
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#104
Quote: Originally Posted by Mowich View Post

"....young women had to trade their bodies...". Actually, CC they made a choice to put the advancement of their careers over their own safety. Did Weinstein take advantage of them? He may have, but........had they not made the wrong choice in the first place, he would not have been able to do so. There are women who were not comfortable with the guy and they choose to walk away rather than take a chance that he may have ulterior motives when inviting them to hotel rooms etc.

I think Weinstein is a creep. He may very well be guilty of the accusations made against him. In the absence of validated testimony to date, it is yet another 'he said, she said' controversy. Hopefully, the up coming court case will reveal the truth.


================================================== ================================================== ====


YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



SOME YOUNG WOMEN traded their bodies for fame and fortune!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!


And some young women have been trqding on their looks since BEFORE humanity even existed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Humanity inherited traits from both Chimpanzees and Bonobos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And Bonobo females who find a good food source frequently manage to keep said good food supplies to themselves by offering sex to males!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


If he is busy screwing her then he is NOT eating her food!



Trump is right- some women CAN be grabbed by the crotch If you have a big enough wallet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


One has to ask if the MeToo movement is not partly motivated by regret- as in "I sold out too cheap"?
 
MHz
#105
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

SOME YOUNG WOMEN traded their bodies for fame and fortune!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
And some young women have been trqding on their looks since BEFORE humanity even existed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You also appear to have existed before humanity.

Soldiers and Hookers are how it started, guess who needs soldiers all the time, guess who are the biggest human traffickers, especially women for the sex trade?
 
B00Mer
+3
#106
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#107
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post








================================================== ================================================== ==


Oh well.....my argument might have been better if MHz actually KNEW WHAT A BONOBO WAS?????????????????????


And |Muslims believe that Allah will give them 72 virgins if they die while performing jihad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Gosh- maybe Muslims have a closer genetic relationship to sex mad Bonobos than some people want to admit????????????????????



And I guess MHZ shuns any anthropological study that might connect humans with Chimpanzees?????????????????


After all- radical Muslims have already told us that Jews are the missing link between human and ape!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And oh dear- the hairless, circumcised semi apes are defeating Muslims at every turn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And Allah stands aside and watches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Even the rocks and trees stand silent as Jews WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Could the Quran be mistaken about how the rocks and trees will become disgusted by the Jews and call out to the Muslim Faithful: come here- a Jew is hiding behind me- come and kill him????????????????



How humiliating!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Even the rocks wont cooperate with radical Muslims as promised by Allah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Hoid
+1
#108
Quote: Originally Posted by Mowich View Post

There are, Hoid and yet not one has been proven in a court of law.............


There are many accusations against Weinstein - so calling it "he said, she said" is inaccurate.

I will allow "he said/they said" - even though he has actually said nothing.
 
Colpy
+2
#109
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

There are many accusations against Weinstein - so calling it "he said, she said" is inaccurate.

I will allow "he said/they said" - even though he has actually said nothing.


Yep.


The allegations against Weinstein are perfectly credible.......the accusations against Kavanaugh were not.


Weinstein has been charged. The expert prosecutor brought in by the Judiciary Committee in the Ford hearing has said no prosecutor would go forward with her charges........
 
Cliffy
#110
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Yep.


The allegations against Weinstein are perfectly credible.......the accusations against Kavanaugh were not.


Weinstein has been charged. The expert prosecutor brought in by the Judiciary Committee in the Ford hearing has said no prosecutor would go forward with her charges........

Doesn't change the fact that he lied under oath. The fix was in. Nothing would have changed their minds just like they never let the charges against the Dumpster were blacked out.
 
MHz
#111
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

================================================== ================================================== ==
Oh well.....my argument might have been better if MHz actually KNEW WHAT A BONOBO WAS?????????????????????

I tend to leave left field open so I know where the attack will come from. In your world it would be known as 'a trap'.
Besides, this is your confessional to show you are part of the collective rather than it being all about me, sorry, that should be 'little old me'.

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

And |Muslims believe that Allah will give them 72 virgins if they die while performing jihad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You seem to know more about them than you would need to. Do you have a reference that says they are no longer virgins after that man takes custody of them. Perhaps it means they are safe with him rather than facing the outcome you seem to have in store for them should you be the ones who gets them. Tisk, tisk you have a perverted little mind don't you?

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

Gosh- maybe Muslims have a closer genetic relationship to sex mad Bonobos than some people want to admit????????????????????

Considering all 5 fingered people look like God and the Holy Spirit and their only child Christ that is quite an attempt to insult them. Primates were created after the 4 Beast that stand around the Throne of God when God is seated. They were used as the 'seeds' for all other flesh that was created during the days of creation. That would be considered an honor like parents honor their parents by naming their children after them.

Are you really sure you want to promote that these beings are unfit to be in the station they are in?

Re:4:2-9:
And immediately I was in the spirit:
and,
behold,
a throne was set in heaven,
and one sat on the throne.
And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone:
and there was a rainbow round about the throne,
in sight like unto an emerald.
And round about the throne were four and twenty seats:
and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting,
clothed in white raiment;
and they had on their heads crowns of gold.
And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices:
and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne,
which are the seven Spirits of God.
And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal:
and in the midst of the throne,
and round about the throne,
were four beasts full of eyes before and behind.
And the first beast was like a lion,
and the second beast like a calf,
and the third beast had a face as a man,
and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.
And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him;
and they were full of eyes within:
and they rest not day and night,
saying,
Holy,
holy,
holy,
Lord God Almighty,
which was,
and is, and is to come.
And when those beasts give glory and honour and thanks to him that sat on the throne,
who liveth for ever and ever,

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

And I guess MHZ shuns any anthropological study that might connect humans with Chimpanzees?????????????????

They are different species, always have been so don't fuk with nature, it won't get any results. Humans differ from primates when they took mates for life and protected the children rather than it being survival of the fittest and 'many hands' became the winners on the 'battle-fields'.

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

After all- radical Muslims have already told us that Jews are the missing link between human and ape!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As pointed out above, you seem to have all the memos sent out to just radical Muslims. Too bad the closest guards are your best friends.

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

And oh dear- the hairless, circumcised semi apes are defeating Muslims at every turn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you even human, probably have a slit in your 3rd eye, freak.

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

And Allah stands aside and watches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who? Can you speak in something other than Muslim terms as the NT is the final authority as far as knowledge foe humans from God in Ge:1:1.

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

Even the rocks and trees stand silent as Jews WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The clouds weep, how many signs from God do you need. The sales on your eyes shed all attempts by God to reach you, and you think that quality is worthy of praise to the point of near worship.

De:4:26-28:
I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day,
that ye shall soon utterly perish from off the land whereunto ye go over Jordan to possess it;
ye shall not prolong your days upon it,
but shall utterly be destroyed.
And the LORD shall scatter you among the nations,
and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen,
whither the LORD shall lead you.
And there ye shall serve gods,
the work of men's hands,
wood and stone,
which neither see,
nor hear,
nor eat,
nor smell.

Re:18:7:
How much she hath glorified herself,
and lived deliciously,
so much torment and sorrow give her:
for she saith in her heart,
I sit a queen,
and am no widow,
and shall see no sorrow.

La:1:1-2:
How doth the city sit solitary,
that was full of people! how is she become as a widow!
she that was great among the nations,
and princess among the provinces,
how is she become tributary!
She weepeth sore in the night,
and her tears are on her cheeks:
among all her lovers she hath none to comfort her:
all her friends have dealt treacherously with her,
they are become her enemies.

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

Could the Quran be mistaken about how the rocks and trees will become disgusted by the Jews and call out to the Muslim Faithful: come here- a Jew is hiding behind me- come and kill him????????????????

Do you know the Bible as well as you do the Muslim Holy Book? At this point it doesn't matter if you know the Jewish version of the OT as it would be wrong.
Did you know they want to nuke Damascus while it is full because of 1 verse in the OT. Are you sure jou know how is lost and who isn't??

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

How humiliating!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How does the collective handle the flood of lies that comes out of 'your camp'? As long as it is to a Gentile or in front of a gentile it's not a lie kind of witchcraft?

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

Even the rocks wont cooperate with radical Muslims as promised by Allah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That explains them, why are Jews so determined to do the opposite of what the Bible promotes?? (I trust you know something about them considering how big of a fan you are)

Carry on with your groveling.
 
MHz
+1
#112
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

Doesn't change the fact that he lied under oath. The fix was in. Nothing would have changed their minds just like they never let the charges against the Dumpster were blacked out.

Getting away with it is not the same as 'innocent', unless you are rich and in America. The reason the swamp doesn't get cleaned up is because the legal department in the whole US would be out of a job and they 'earn' just about as much as the Pentagram does. Getting off is expensive, period.


Good reason to wire every Government employee, make the recordings available to the public and have a comment section.
 
Hoid
#113
15 of 16 Rapists Will Walk Free
61% of rapes/sexual assaults are not reported to the police. Those rapists, of course, never serve a day in prison.
If the rape is reported to police, there is a 50.8% chance that an arrest will be made.
If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.
If there is a felony conviction, there is a 69% chance the convict will spend time in jail.
So, even in those 39% of rapes that are reported to police, there is only a 16.3% chance the rapist will end up in prison.
Factoring in unreported rapes, about 6% - 1 out of 16 - of rapists will ever spend a day in jail. 15 out of 16 will walk free.
 
MHz
#114
Solution: Open carry.
 
Mowich
+4
#115
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

15 of 16 Rapists Will Walk Free
61% of rapes/sexual assaults are not reported to the police. Those rapists, of course, never serve a day in prison.
If the rape is reported to police, there is a 50.8% chance that an arrest will be made.
If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.
If there is a felony conviction, there is a 69% chance the convict will spend time in jail.
So, even in those 39% of rapes that are reported to police, there is only a 16.3% chance the rapist will end up in prison.
Factoring in unreported rapes, about 6% - 1 out of 16 - of rapists will ever spend a day in jail. 15 out of 16 will walk free.


Great stats, Hoid.............where's the frickin' link????
 
Colpy
+5
#116
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

15 of 16 Rapists Will Walk Free
61% of rapes/sexual assaults are not reported to the police. Those rapists, of course, never serve a day in prison.
If the rape is reported to police, there is a 50.8% chance that an arrest will be made.
If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.
If there is a felony conviction, there is a 69% chance the convict will spend time in jail.
So, even in those 39% of rapes that are reported to police, there is only a 16.3% chance the rapist will end up in prison.
Factoring in unreported rapes, about 6% - 1 out of 16 - of rapists will ever spend a day in jail. 15 out of 16 will walk free.


One of the dumbest things you have ever posted.




If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.


If they are not prosecuted, that is because there is a lack of evidence, which means they are innocent.


If they are not convicted, that means they are innocent.


You know, the basic legal right, innocent until proven guilty.
 
spilledthebeer
#117
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

One of the dumbest things you have ever posted.




If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.


If they are not prosecuted, that is because there is a lack of evidence, which means they are innocent.


If they are not convicted, that means they are innocent.


You know, the basic legal right, innocent until proven guilty.




================================================== ================================================== ==


Unfortunately LIE-berals have figured out there is MONEY to be made in issuing Fake News about rape statistics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in TYPICAL LIE-beral fashion - they do not mind ALTERING the statistics to suit themselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is by the use of such Fake News that LIE-berals have taken over college and university campuses as documented by Professor Jordan Peterson!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



This is why Peterson is so hated and reviled by LIE-berals- because he is an educated, well informed person who is ripping the smoke screens away from LIE-beral Fake News!!!!!!!!!!!!



The Feminazi will tell you that 38 percent of woman are in hospital seeking aid for injuries received from spousal abuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What they WILL NOT tell you is this::::::::::::::


That 38 percent of MEN are in hospital seeking medical aid for spousal abuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


NOR will LIE-berals tell you that these spousal abuse numbers were gathered from hospitals located in the meanest- most crime ridden ghettos in the entire United States!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Nor will LIE-berals tell you that these spousal abuse numbers DO NOT - IN ANY WAY - relate to the lives of ordinary middle class people!!!!!!!!!!!!


One woman in three assaulted???????????????????????


ONLY IN THE MEANEST CRACK HOUSE IN TOWN is such a thing true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


As for those 38 percent of men in hospital as a result of spousal abuse- it is proof she can be as crazy as HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh- she may not be able to fight him toe to toe- she may just WAIT - till he goes to sleep and then tenderize his head with a frying pan!!!!!!!!!!!


This is the life style of drug addicts and criminals and generally crazy people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And Cdn LIE-berals once came out with some "definitions" of spousal abuse that included such gems as:


"If hubby yells at wife, then he is abusing and intimidating her"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


No matter that she has- as an example- been out at the race track, drinking and blowing the rent money and deserves to be sobered up and straightened up and chastized!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-berals would roundly condemn a man for wasting the rent money that way.......but they have NOTHING to say about women doing such things because LIE-berals DENY that women would be so irresponsible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is why Karla Homolka- the wife and rapist HELPER of Paul Bernardo is living happily in Montreal with a nice new life and a couple of kids while Bernardo rots in jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


If LIE-berals understood law and justice. then KILLER Homolka would be sitting in the cell NEXT to her killer hubby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is not known if Homolka helped in the actually murders of school girls French and Mahafy- but we DO KNOW she aided in dismembering the bodies and disposing of the pieces!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And there is GRAPHIC video evidence that Homolka fully participated in the attacks on the victims!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


But LIE-berals refuse to believe that one woman would abuse another that way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-beral values are so POISONED that they assume any woman behaving badly has been FORCED to behave that way by a wicked MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-berals DENY ANY evidence that might lose them votes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1



It is that same LIE-beral mind set that has allowed LIE-berals to shrug off the news that Terry Lynn McClintock - who KILLED 8 year old Tori Stafford with a hammer after her boy friend had raped the girl TWICE- and is now being shipped off to a native "healing lodge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


WE should not hate either McClintock or Homolka- they are mentally ill in ways far beyond our understanding- but letting EITHER of them loose- even for an hour is LIE-beral MADNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And Our idiot Boy Justin LEFT our parliament - high tailed it and RAN - so he would not be forced to be involved in the vote on whether McClintock deserved to be in jail- rather than that "healing lodge"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And I guess that is all we need to know about Our idiot Boy and his views on child KILLERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Hoid
#118
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

One of the dumbest things you have ever posted.




If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.


If they are not prosecuted, that is because there is a lack of evidence, which means they are innocent.


If they are not convicted, that means they are innocent.


You know, the basic legal right, innocent until proven guilty.

Why not read the source documents and then let everyone know how stupid statistics are.
http://www.sarsonline.org/resources-...s-laws-statics
 
MHz
#119
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

You know, the basic legal right, innocent until proven guilty.

Give the one charged the Public Defender and give the victim the high paid lawyer and that the ration change over-night. If the law went after the elite as much as they enforce park rules on the homeless there would be a lot more cases that could result in a guilty verdict because that is what happened rather than who had the shiftiest lawyer.
 
taxslave
#120
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

One of the dumbest things you have ever posted.
If an arrest is made, there is an 80% chance of prosecution. If there is a prosecution, there is a 58% chance of a felony conviction.
If they are not prosecuted, that is because there is a lack of evidence, which means they are innocent.
If they are not convicted, that means they are innocent.
You know, the basic legal right, innocent until proven guilty.

Right, wrong, legal doesn't enter in to if if you are doing it for the cause.
 

Similar Threads

9
100 Celebrity Women Rebuke #metoo Movement
by Hoof Hearted | Aug 25th, 2018
18
#MeToo remaking society literally overnight
by mentalfloss | Aug 24th, 2018