Gun Control is Completely Useless.


Colpy
Conservative
+1
#15181
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

https://youtu.be/0kxDfMafZkI


this is total ignorance. you can't make this shit up.


That AR 15 is cleverly disguised.


The make-up artist would be in big demand in Canada very soon.
 
Hoid
#15182
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Yes.


Like they are right now, because you have to have a PAL, and violent offenders do not have a PAL.


Really, try to focus.


The people who are going to make a plethora of semi-auto rifles available on the black market are the idiots (like yourself) that want them prohibited and seized. You learned nothing from the long gun registry, because you are morons.

That is gun control
 
Colpy
Conservative
+2
#15183
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

That is gun control


Actually, licensing is approval of the person. It is people control.
 
Hoid
#15184
Actually it is gun control.
 
Mowich
Conservative
+4
#15185
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

When I was in the army cadets in high school we learned to field strip a bren gun and put it back together.....
The teacher who had been in ww 2 could do it blindfolded.
People nowadays would be surprised to learn that...
The school in those days had an indoor firing range and all the cadets had to learn how to shoot in the prone position with army rifles
chambered for .22 cal
That was after school hours or weekends....
The best shots seemed to be the farm boys that were familiar with rifles from a young age....

One of our past times on the farm was shooting rats at dusk. We'd be in the quonset with the doors partially closed waiting to see their beady red eyes popping out underneath the granaries. Got to be pretty darn good after awhile.
 
pgs
Free Thinker
#15186
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

I would prefer that both these weapons be treated and classified in the same fashion, and be readily available to PAL holders...........who, by definition, are NOT "violent offenders".


The people who are going to make a plethora of semi-auto rifles available on the black market are the idiots (like yourself) that want them prohibited and seized. You learned nothing from the long gun registry, because you are morons.


The LGR got, at best, 70% of firearms registered, **at best**. The rest were driven underground as illegal guns.........


How many of the non-restricted firearms they are about to seize (Mini 14s, SKS, M305, VZ5 do you think will actually be turned in?


The rest go to the black market. Eventually.


The entire plan is idiotic, ineffective, and counter-productive.

Doesn’t matter guns are bad .
 
Hoid
#15187
We could just say nobody gets a PAL for a handgun.

There.

People control.
 
Colpy
Conservative
+4
#15188
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

We could just say nobody gets a PAL for a handgun.

There.

People control.


A person requires an RPAL to purchase a handgun. A PAL doesn't cut it. The RPAL is an entirely different course on top of the PAL course.
 
Hoid
#15189
ok.

we'll say nobody is allowed to have an RPAL

Now thats some good people control
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+2
#15190
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

ok.

we'll say nobody is allowed to have an RPAL

Now thats some good people control


Do you EVER stop nattering?
 
taxslave
Free Thinker
+3
#15191
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Do you EVER stop nattering?

Just making sure everyone knows he is a stupid fascist. And a troll.
 
spilledthebeer
#15192
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

clearly a police chief that is politically driven.




In our modern LIE-beral influenced Socialist State.................


YOU DONT GET TO BE POLICE CHIEF UNLESS YOU PLAY THE POLITICAL CHARADE GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


But every once in a while a Chief loses it and SPEAKS HIS MIND HONESTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


That is why police chiefs can support LIE-beral efforts to BAN long guns in the hands of hunters and target shooters..........................


even though they KNOW IT WILL NOT AFFECT CRIMINALS CARRYING ILLEGAL PISTOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Colpy
Conservative
+5
#15193
Letter to The Chilliwack Progress:


While reading the Dec. 4 edition of the Chilliwack Progress, I was shocked and angered by the Pre Christmas Sale from International Shooting Supplies’ ad. The ad contained six specific offerings for handguns.


Handguns are the weapon of choice used in the ongoing gang war and the drug-induced gang violence being fought through Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley. For years we have been told handguns were being smuggled over the border and sold to gang members, but this ad proves otherwise.


Without a doubt these weapons should be banned; military style assault weapons are not the main culprit, handguns are. When will the government stop promising legislation and deliver meaningful action?


As responsible corporate citizens, Black Press Media should not accept these types of ads.

DJ Desautels

(my emphasis)


This guy seems to think any gangbanger can walk into the local sporting goods store, buy a .357 Magnum, and walk out.


I can't even imagine this level of stupid.
 
petros
+4
#15194
Cabela's flyers must give some people panic attacks.
 
Hoid
#15195
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Letter to The Chilliwack Progress:


While reading the Dec. 4 edition of the Chilliwack Progress, I was shocked and angered by the Pre Christmas Sale from International Shooting Supplies’ ad. The ad contained six specific offerings for handguns.


Handguns are the weapon of choice used in the ongoing gang war and the drug-induced gang violence being fought through Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley. For years we have been told handguns were being smuggled over the border and sold to gang members, but this ad proves otherwise.


Without a doubt these weapons should be banned; military style assault weapons are not the main culprit, handguns are. When will the government stop promising legislation and deliver meaningful action?


As responsible corporate citizens, Black Press Media should not accept these types of ads.

DJ Desautels

(my emphasis)


This guy seems to think any gangbanger can walk into the local sporting goods store, buy a .357 Magnum, and walk out.


I can't even imagine this level of stupid.

He doesn't know about people control
 
AnnaEmber
No Party Affiliation
#15196
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Believe it or not they already understand all of that.

Except for the criminalizing part.

That's just something you made up

Nope. The Gliberals criminalized anyone that didn't register their firearms before regardless of whether they had ever done any other crimes beside practising civil disobedience.
Where the hell were you in and after 1993?
 
AnnaEmber
No Party Affiliation
#15197
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Actually it is gun control.

lmao Yeah, guns are always looking for licenses, not people.
 
Hoid
#15198
Isn't that when all the gun nits lost their shit over a gun registry?
 
DaSleeper
+1
#15199
Dunno about the other provinces, but in Ontario you need at least a PAL to buy ammunition
Hell I even needed at least a PAL to buy handloading components such as powder, primers ect from

Higginson powder and handloading supplies in Hawksbury




https://toronto.citynews.ca/2015/08/...ion-ownership/
Last edited by DaSleeper; Dec 12th, 2019 at 09:44 AM..
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#15200
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Isn't that when all the gun nits lost their shit over a gun registry?


Bill C-68, The Firearms Act, under the Liberal gov't, 1995.
 
Colpy
Conservative
+4
#15201
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Dunno about the other provinces, but in Ontario you need at least a PAL to buy ammunition
Hell I even needed at least a PAL to buy handloading components such as powder, primers ect from

Higginson powder and handloading supplies in Hawksbury




https://toronto.citynews.ca/2015/08/...ion-ownership/


Federal law requires a PAL to buy ammunition.
 
Hoid
#15202
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Bill C-68, The Firearms Act, under the Liberal gov't, 1995.

Oh please. That all started long before 1995
 
Colpy
Conservative
+3
#15203
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Oh please. That all started long before 1995


Dear Moron:


The long gun registry was part of the 1995 Firearms Act, and that is what you were asking about.


In fact, it was not fully implemented until December 31, 2002.


I've got an idea that's unique and new; why don't you just not talk about things that you know nothing about?


In short, STFU.


Thank you.


Bob
 
Colpy
Conservative
+2
#15204
Canadian police chiefs say they don’t support ban on handguns despite fears that handgun violence is escalating in some cities across the country.
The head of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police says no new law banning handguns is needed because strong firearms laws already exist.
Vancouver Police Chief Adam Palmer says that in the majority of cases involving gun violence, the handguns being used are already illegal and it makes no sense to ban something that it already illegal.
“In every single case there are already offences for that,” Palmer said Wednesday in Calgary, at the conclusion of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police’s annual meeting.
“They’re already breaking the law and the criminal law in Canada addresses all those circumstances.


https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2019/08/15/...-wouldnt-work/
 
spilledthebeer
#15205
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

We could just say nobody gets a PAL for a handgun.

There.

People control.




So tell us hemerHOID.....................................


WHO ISSUED your license to be an IDIOT??????????????????????????


Since most crime guns in Canada ARE IMPORTED from United States.....................................


and a few others are MADE in illegal gun shops...................................


why dot you explain to us how canceling PAL`s for pistol owners will lower crime rates with ILLEGAL GUNS?????????????


Since gang bangers DO NOT HAVE PAL`s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


To keep it simple for the LICENSED hemerHOID idiot - we could look at a single case..............................


the one involving the guy who was arrested as a drunk driver.........................................


and was hand cuffed in the back of a police cruiser..................................


being watched on video as he wiggled around to get out the ILLEGAL PISTOL he was carrying.......................................... ......


out if his pocket and trying to hide it under the car seat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And of course the guy WAS ALREADY BANNED from owning any sort of firearm.................................


thanks to his previous CONVICTIONS for assault and other offenses..................................



much less having a RESTRICTED WEAPON such as the semi automatic pistol he was video taped trying to hide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


So tell us oh great wise hemerHOID...................................


HOW WOULD BANNING PAL`s affect the actions of this ARMED DRUNK in any way?????????????????


And in related news - do you enjoy being exposed as a card carrying licensed IDIOT???????????????????


What sort of MASOCHIST ARE YOU anyway????????????????????????
 
Hoid
#15206
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Canadian police chiefs say they don’t support ban on handguns despite fears that handgun violence is escalating in some cities across the country.
The head of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police says no new law banning handguns is needed because strong firearms laws already exist.
Vancouver Police Chief Adam Palmer says that in the majority of cases involving gun violence, the handguns being used are already illegal and it makes no sense to ban something that it already illegal.
“In every single case there are already offences for that,” Palmer said Wednesday in Calgary, at the conclusion of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police’s annual meeting.
“They’re already breaking the law and the criminal law in Canada addresses all those circumstances.


https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2019/08/15/...-wouldnt-work/

now let's think back to what Clompy had to say about this group if people when they were begging not to destroy the long gun registry and hurt police all over the country..
 
spilledthebeer
#15207
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

now let's think back to what Clompy had to say about this group if people when they were begging not to destroy the long gun registry and hurt police all over the country..




Oh hemerHOID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!


What a MARVELOUS HYPOCRITE YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Police chiefs supported the long gun registry because being a police chief.....................



IS A POLITICAL APPOINTMENT and thus chiefs must lick LIE-beral boots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Police Chiefs also made it known at the time that the long gun registry HAD LARGE HOLES IN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Meaning IT DID NOT TELL COPS if there might be ILLEGAL guns in the house!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Thus the COSTLY long gun registry was ESSENTIALLY USELESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And now we have a police chief speaking honestly about the USELESS NATURE of a hand gun ban........................


that WILL NOT AFFECT ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!


And you are trying to suggest there is something wrong with the Colpy argument!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


In order to DEFLECT from your own BULLSH+T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What a MAROON YOU ARE hemerHOID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#15208
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Dear Moron:


The long gun registry was part of the 1995 Firearms Act, and that is what you were asking about.


In fact, it was not fully implemented until December 31, 2002.


I've got an idea that's unique and new; why don't you just not talk about things that you know nothing about?


In short, STFU.


Thank you.


Bob


Strange coincidence...…………….I've been having the same thought!
 
Colpy
Conservative
+2
#15209
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

now let's think back to what Clompy had to say about this group if people when they were begging not to destroy the long gun registry and hurt police all over the country..


Yes, let's do that.


I said that the organization was essentially political in nature, that it did not represent officers on the street, that it was being used by the state as a propaganda tool and as a conduit to funnel gov't money to Canadian special interest groups ($160,000 to Canadians for Gun Control) and that they got large donations from the company that was making tens of millions setting up (screwing up) the registry's computer system, and that they should STFU.


I was right on all points, and the LGR was a complete failure.


Now they are getting no new money, they are not being used by the state as a propaganda tool (obviously) and the same political organization is actually coming out against new laws...........this time they are obviously absolutely correct.



As am I.


Deal with it.
 
Hoid
#15210
An intellectual giant.