Gun Control is Completely Useless.


JamesBondo
+1
#10501
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

posted by Colpy:[I]" It certainly was not meant to portray a bunch of gun owners walking around with guns in their pockets with no order or purpose other than to serve a personal ego boost.

Do you realize how dumb you sound? You are saying that somewhere between the declaration of independance and the 2nd ammendment, the founding fathers of the USA no longer wanted the people empowered to rise up against a tyranical government.
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
+1
#10502
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

I'm sorry, but your stats are bullshit.
There are countries, as I have pointed out repeatedly, that are both advanced and have worse murder rates than the USA.
In fact, even the recently rising US murder rate is below the world average.
And there are many countries on the UN list of high or very highly developed nations that have murder rates higher than the USA.
Check your "facts"

The "fact" is that the USA is a fukced up, violent mess and just because you can find afew other countries that are in worse shape, does not make them "good".
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#10503
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

posted by Colpy:"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."I

Decent gun contol does not infringe. Accept that "Arms" or "a well regulated militia and security of a free state" has not changed...ie Arms in past times could mean anything from a single shot rifle to a pitch fork now means anything from a nuclear bomb to a baseball bat; just as a" WELL regulated Militia" now means in most of the world, a country's army and that a "militia" of previous times meant a small force formed by local towns. This discription now bears more resemblance to a town's police force or a country's army, It certainly was not meant to portray a bunch of gun owners walking around with guns in their pockets with no order or purpose other than to serve a personal ego boost.


You do understand the dangerous precedent inherent in that argument?


If the Second Amendment only protects the citizen's right to keep and bear a musket, then the First Amendment only protects speech shouted from a podium, written long hand, or printed on a very rudimentary printing press.
 
Hoid
#10504
The problem with guns in America is with the legal system.

That is what has to be fixed and that is what is being fixed.
 
Hoid
#10505
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

The "fact" is that the USA is a fukced up, violent mess and just because you can find afew other countries that are in worse shape, does not make them "good".

The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. The U.S. rate firearm-related deaths is closer to 10 or 16 times the rates of countries such as Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, New Zealand and Spain.
 
JamesBondo
#10506
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

The "fact" is that the USA is a fukced up, violent mess and just because you can find afew other countries that are in worse shape, does not make them "good".

Do you realize how dumb you sound? You are saying 107 other countries is "afew".
 
JamesBondo
+1
#10507
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The problem with guns in America is with the legal system.
That is what has to be fixed and that is what is being fixed.


Clearly, you should spend more time in a thread about the US legal system, and less time passing down stupid comments to Canadian sportsmen.
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
+1
#10508
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

Do you realize how dumb you sound? You are saying 107 other countries is "afew".

What's with you two evil hastards, anyway? Do you really WANT us to end up like the Americans?
 
Colpy
Conservative
#10509
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. The U.S. rate firearm-related deaths is closer to 10 or 16 times the rates of countries such as Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, New Zealand and Spain.


Dimwit:


As has been explained to you on numerous occasions, the use of "gun related" murder stats only is a perversion of the truth used by anti-liberty fascists (heh, that's fun!) to mislead the uncaring and ignorant.



One more time:


If I have available a can of gasoline and a match, a baseball bat, a length of wire, a Studebaker, some drain cleaner, a rock, a sharp stick, a pillow, a kitchen knife, a bathtub, my fists and feet, and an AR 15 rifle, and I decide to kill someone...........I would probably use the AR 15.


If I don't have an AR 15......................any of the other items will do.


And are used. In fact, fists and feet and knives are used more often than any rifle to kill in the USA.


That said, handguns are by far the weapon most often used.............and they are used more often in legal defense than offense.


So stow your bullshit.
 
Colpy
Conservative
#10510
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. The U.S. rate firearm-related deaths is closer to 10 or 16 times the rates of countries such as Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, New Zealand and Spain.


BTW this: The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia is simply unadulterated bullshit.


The murder rate in the USA is 5.35 per 100,000.


To be a murder rate 1/20th or less than the USA a country would have to have a murder rate less than 0.267 per 100,000.


Australia: .44


France: 1.35


UK: 1.2


Israel: 1.36 (and people there carry guns)


South Korea: 0.7


Japan: 0.28 (close, but no cigar)


Norway: .51


Poland: 0.67


Slovenia: 0.48


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate



NOT ONE of the countries you list matches your claim.


I think you need to brush up on your math.


After you grow a brain.
 
pgs
Free Thinker
+1
#10511
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

The "fact" is that the USA is a fukced up, violent mess and just because you can find afew other countries that are in worse shape, does not make them "good".

Go shove your anti Americanism up your rear end . Canadian loser .Poor little George jealous of American exceptionalism.
 
JamesBondo
+1
#10512
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

BTW this: The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern0Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia is simply unadulterated bullshit.
The murder rate in the USA is 5.35 per 100,000.
To be a murder rate 1/20th or less than the USA a country would have to have a murder rate less than 0.267 per 100,000.
Australia: .44
France: 1.35
UK: 1.2
Israel: 1.36 (and people there carry guns)
South Korea: 0.7
Japan: 0.28 (close, but no cigar)
Norway: .51
Poland: 0.67
Slovenia: 0.48
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate
NOT ONE of the countries you list matches your claim.
I think you need to brush up on your math.
After you grow a brain.

I think he is a LIE-beral.
 
DaSleeper
+1
#10513
Colpy, You must remember that old Heinz commercial from the 60's that ended with the tag line...


"You can't tell a Heinz pickle nuthin"
I kinda like this one
""Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. It'll just knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut about like it's won anyway."
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#10514
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Colpy, You must remember that old Heinz commercial from the 60's that ended with the tag line...


"You can't tell a Heinz pickle nuthin"
I kinda like this one
""Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. It'll just knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut about like it's won anyway."


Now, if you can only get Hoid and Curious Canadian agreeing with you, you'll be getting somewhere!
 
DaSleeper
+2
#10515
I'm retired......I'm not a trainer anymore and Some Are beyond training
 
Hoid
#10516
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

BTW this: The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia is simply unadulterated bullshit.


The murder rate in the USA is 5.35 per 100,000.


To be a murder rate 1/20th or less than the USA a country would have to have a murder rate less than 0.267 per 100,000.


Australia: .44


France: 1.35


UK: 1.2


Israel: 1.36 (and people there carry guns)


South Korea: 0.7


Japan: 0.28 (close, but no cigar)


Norway: .51


Poland: 0.67


Slovenia: 0.48


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate



NOT ONE of the countries you list matches your claim.


I think you need to brush up on your math.


After you grow a brain.

Nobody mentioned murder rates, Einstein.

The topic is death by guns.

Do try to work up some new material.
 
Hoid
#10517
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

US gun deaths reach record high in 2017

...39,773 people died by guns in 2017, which is an increase of more than 10,000 deaths from the 28,874 in 1999. The age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths per 100,000 people rose from 10.3 per 100,000 in 1999 to 12 per 100,000 in 2017....

https://www.theroot.com/gun-deaths-i...gun-1831080159

See?

Do everyone a favor and leave this discussion to those who have something to say about it.

You are on record as saying there is no solution, therefore you have had your little say and you can move on to other important matters.
 
spilledthebeer
#10518
[QUOTE=JamesBondo;2685445]Yes, they value equality of outcome so much they are prepared to compromise equal rights and equal opportunity


Just like the way you avoid admitting that I am not a liberal.It makes you look like a dumbass.



================================================== ================================================== ==


Oh you LIE-BERAL dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Just because you diverge from the other LIE-berals on gun control does not make you SOMETHING OTHER THAN LIE-beral!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Erwin Rommel was NOT a member of Nazi party but he fought hard enough for them and that made him a Nazi target!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-berals are DANGEROUS because they demand the right to EDIT OUR HISTORY to HIDE THEIR SINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Just like YOU DO Bondo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You have conveniently FORGOTTEN that you threatened several times to have me BANNED from commenting on this site because


you claimed I had violated the LYING LIE-beral interpretation of "fair usage" policy created by clever propaganda meisters at CBC to



LIMIT PUBLIC COMMENT that was not friendly to your beloved LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


No doubt you have conveniently "FORGOTTEN YOUR VARIOUS THREATENING MESSAGES that I should be silent or face legal action!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You have LIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



You have been caught out and called out on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And now your "defense" is to deny it ever happened!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And you are just like the LIE-beral - NOT LIE-beral senators that Our idiot Boy Justin has MAGICALLY CREATED simply by taking away their long held LIE-beral party cards- with a wink and a smile!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And WE ALL KNOW ITS A LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


They ARE STILL LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



LIE-beral policy MIGHT magically become more acceptable to the general public if LIE-berals STOPPED using so very many LIES to support their policies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


As for me flying off the handle????????????????????????????????


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Let me ask you ONE SIMPLE QUESTION: "Will Our idiot Boy Justin allow the building of the Kinder Morgan pipeline or not"?



It is a straight forward question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


All it needs is a YES OR NO answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


So why dont we have that answer?????????????????


Our idiot Boy has told us that he wants to kill the entire Alberta oil patch - snd he has also told us he considers completing Kinder Morgan is in the NATIONAL INTEREST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


So which Trudope statement is the lie???????????????????????????


This why I comment so often- BECAUSE YOU LIE-BERALS play so fast and loose with truth and OUR MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 
JamesBondo
#10519
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Nobody mentioned murder rates, Einstein.
The topic is death by guns.
Do try to work up some new material.

The UK doesn't track death by guns, they only track murder convictions by gun. Do try to keep up with the material that you are using.
 
JamesBondo
#10520
[QUOTE=spilledthebeer;2685614]
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

Yes, they value equality of outcome so much they are prepared to compromise equal rights and equal opportunity


Just like the way you avoid admitting that I am not a liberal.It makes you look like a dumbass.
================================================== ================================================== ==
Oh you LIE-BERAL dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Just because you diverge from the other LIE-berals on gun control does not make you SOMETHING OTHER THAN LIE-beral!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Erwin Rommel was NOT a member of Nazi party but he fought hard enough for them and that made him a Nazi target!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LIE-berals are DANGEROUS because they demand the right to EDIT OUR HISTORY to HIDE THEIR SINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just like YOU DO Bondo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You have conveniently FORGOTTEN that you threatened several times to have me BANNED from commenting on this site because
you claimed I had violated the LYING LIE-beral interpretation of "fair usage" policy created by clever propaganda meisters at CBC to
LIMIT PUBLIC COMMENT that was not friendly to your beloved LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No doubt you have conveniently "FORGOTTEN YOUR VARIOUS THREATENING MESSAGES that I should be silent or face legal action!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You have LIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You have been caught out and called out on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And now your "defense" is to deny it ever happened!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And you are just like the LIE-beral - NOT LIE-beral senators that Our idiot Boy Justin has MAGICALLY CREATED simply by taking away their long held LIE-beral party cards- with a wink and a smile!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And WE ALL KNOW ITS A LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They ARE STILL LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LIE-beral policy MIGHT magically become more acceptable to the general public if LIE-berals STOPPED using so very many LIES to support their policies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As for me flying off the handle????????????????????????????????
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let me ask you ONE SIMPLE QUESTION: "Will Our idiot Boy Justin allow the building of the Kinder Morgan pipeline or not"?
It is a straight forward question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All it needs is a YES OR NO answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So why dont we have that answer?????????????????
Our idiot Boy has told us that he wants to kill the entire Alberta oil patch - snd he has also told us he considers completing Kinder Morgan is in the NATIONAL INTEREST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So which Trudope statement is the lie???????????????????????????
This why I comment so often- BECAUSE YOU LIE-BERALS play so fast and loose with truth and OUR MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Serious question, STB, and if you want to be a pussy, just go ahead and don't answer it.

On a scale of 0 - 100( 100 being awesome) where do you perceive your posts to be?
 
Colpy
Conservative
+2
#10521
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Nobody mentioned murder rates, Einstein.

The topic is death by guns.

Do try to work up some new material.


Dimwit.


As I explained earlier, "gun murder" statistics are a manipulation of the facts by goose-stepping fascist creeps that hate liberty.


If you can not show a lessening of MURDER rates (full stop) by strict gun control, you have no case.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#10522
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

US gun deaths reach record high in 2017

...39,773 people died by guns in 2017, which is an increase of more than 10,000 deaths from the 28,874 in 1999. The age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths per 100,000 people rose from 10.3 per 100,000 in 1999 to 12 per 100,000 in 2017....

https://www.theroot.com/gun-deaths-i...gun-1831080159


Once you are DEAD does it really matter HOW the death was achieved?
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#10523
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Dimwit.


As I explained earlier, "gun murder" statistics are a manipulation of the facts by goose-stepping fascist creeps that hate liberty.


If you can not show a lessening of MURDER rates (full stop) by strict gun control, you have no case.

Ah by the name calling the real stats are really annoying aren't they??

First of all ......it is mostly school children that are causing the demand for gun reform in the US. Oddly enough they want to have a life.

You might take a look at the source of the many gun violence stats, instead of believing the one supported by gun lobbyists and manuacturers.

As for the last declaration you make try looking at Florida's "The Geography of Gun Deaths" Stress, more immigrants & more mental illness had NO correlation to gun deaths:BUT States with tighter gun Control did have fewer gun related deaths!!

This is also backed by a 2016 review of 130 studies done in 10 countries published in Epidemiologic Reviews found that new legal restrictions on owning and purchasing guns was followed by a drop in gun violence.

Why pick out murders when free wheeling gun-toting societies lose so many people to guns than those with decent gun laws??
 
spilledthebeer
#10524
[QUOTE=JamesBondo;2685619]
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post


Serious question, STB, and if you want to be a pussy, just go ahead and don't answer it.

On a scale of 0 - 100( 100 being awesome) where do you perceive your posts to be?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


SERIOUS ANSWER??????????????????????????????


To a LIE-beral????????????????????????????????


To a purveyor of Fake News??????????????????????



Here again is the article containing the quote from the Cdn law professor that CLERLY INDICATES that you and CBC are engaged in deliberate censorship of views hostile to LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And that you are using an unfair and deliberately distorted interpretation of "fair use" policy in your efforts to censor views that do not suit you!






Here is an older article illustrating civil service union Hog greed and just how much support they are prepared to give to LIE-berals in exchange for gravy. With some comments of my own in brackets):

Hubert Lacroix, the president of the CBC, recently placed the future of the Canada’s national public broadcaster on the electoral map with comments aimed at sparking a renewed debate on future funding models. Lacroix disputed claims that low ratings are to blame for the CBC’s financial struggles, instead pointing to the need to consider alternative fee schemes, including new levies on Internet providers or supplementary charges on television purchases.

(So greedy CBC Hogs want to pick the pockets of other businesses in order to salvage their own suddenly shaky place on the LIE-beral gravy train! Why should internet providers be made to pay because their viewers and users have chosen to TURN OFF CBC tv and radio? And considering how widely and rapidly the CBC article mocking the LIE-beral MyDemocracy website as “a box of doughnuts” circulated- it is entirely CLEAR that Cdns will listen to CBC IF it ever finds anything else relevant to say! And that is the trouble- CBC is so busy spouting LIE-beral propaganda that it as NOTHING REAL to say!)

While disagreement over CBC funding is as old as the broadcaster itself, the more uncomfortable discussion for the CBC is its coverage of the 2015 election campaign — particularly its approach to national debates and political party advertising — which raises troubling questions about its relevance in the current media environment.

(Meaning the 2015 federal election that brought Our idiot Boy Justin to power- which featured regular media efforts to smear Conservatives and aid Our idiot Boy and his moronic minons!)

Most would agree that the CBC features an excellent group of reporters and boasts insightful analysts for its panel discussions. However, rather than working to make itself an invaluable resource for the election, the CBC has been unnecessarily restrictive in its broadcasting choices and in the use of its content.

The problem is obvious- CBC DOES NOT WANT informed voters- it wants LIE-beral voters! It jumped on the MyDemocracy website as a one off chance to temporarily show its faux impartiality- about a subject that other media was so scornful of that CBC felt compelled to jump on the band wagon in an effort to cover its own ass!)

The most puzzling decision has been its refusal to broadcast debates hosted by other organizations. The CBC may be disappointed with the debate approach adopted by the political parties in this campaign, but that does not change the sense that if the national public broadcaster does not air programs in the national public interest, it calls into question the very need for a public broadcaster. Indeed, the CBC seems to have cut its nose off to spite its face by doing its best to prove its critics right.

(CBC is being typically Hoggish in refusing to accept debate programing that it did not produce and does not approve of because it does not contain LIE-beral bias! LIE-berals consider suitable debate to be a series of easy questions lobbed gently at them so they can knock it out of the park! Real debate with actually facts is something LIE-berals increasingly SHUN! CBC recognizes- as all Hogs do- that LIE-beral victory- meaning MORE GRAVY- is also a win for CBC- thus CBC DOES NOT WANT any critical examination of LIE-beral policy- for fear of discovering the ROT at its heart!)

The CBC’s odd coverage choices are not limited to the missing debates. Its use of video clips from the debates has also been unnecessarily restrictive. For example, before analyzing the recent Munk debates on the “At Issue” panel, host Peter Mansbridge warned viewers that “we are limited with the excerpts with the amount we are allowed to show.” A similar warning preceded the discussion at other debates.

Yet the reality is that there was no need to be restrictive in the use of video clips. Canadian copyright law permits the use of copyrighted works without permission as part of the fair dealing clause. News reporting is one of the enumerated purposes and even expanded clips would easily qualify under a fair dealing analysis.

(So CBC lied about its policy of deliberately limiting public debate!)

(HEY THERE JAMES BONDO- I DO HOPE YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD about using news clips and such AS THIS DOES MAKE YOU LOOK A FOOL!!!!! And it works for print media as well so long as the real author is given full credit as I always DO! And there is a further issue I am careful with- and that is NOT to put words into the mouth of another writer- it is for this reason that I always make it known that my comments are in brackets when I add words to an article!)

All news organizations are free to use as much of the video from debates as necessary to highlight key moments and positions of each leader. To suggest that the law creates significant limits on the ability to show debate clips is inaccurate.

In fact, the CBC’s misreading of the law is not limited to the use of clips within its news broadcasts.

Just prior to the election call, it asked YouTube and Facebook to remove a Conservative campaign advertisement that used clips from a CBC interview with Liberal leader Justin Trudeau. To support its takedown claim, the CBC argued that “no one – no individual candidate or political party, and no government, corporation or NGO – may re-use our creative and copyrighted property without our permission. This includes our brands, our talent and our content.”

That too is wrong.

(OH? MORE CBC/LIE-beral censorship and deliberate mis-representation of law and facts? And it relates to CBC being wrong about its crap on a paying site! Copyright law covering political comment on a FREE/NON profit site like this is even LOOSER! You have made yourself look foolish as usual!)

The law features important limitations on the rights of all copyright holders and all media organizations regularly rely on them in their reporting. The limits of copyright extend to campaign commercials and there is little that the CBC- or anyone else- can do about it.

With its rejection of the national debates, its limited use of debate clips and its attempts to limit re-use of its broadcast content, Canada’s national public broadcaster has marginalized itself during the election campaign at the very time that it could be demonstrating its relevance to the national political coverage.

(Worse- CBC has been caught deliberately trying to stack voter choice! Just as Our idiot Boy is trying to take over and paralyze our parliament with his idiot electoral reform!)

Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law.

(Geist has done us a favour by illustrating the ugly bias that CBC is trying to hide!)
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#10525
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

Do you realize how dumb you sound? You are saying that somewhere between the declaration of independance and the 2nd ammendment, the founding fathers of the USA no longer wanted the people empowered to rise up against a tyranical government.

LOl You get a thumbs up for making me realize how silly I was for trying to point out that cave man laws have NO relative value in modern day. Explain how you feel carryng a gun would help against a missiles fired by a fully equipped army?
 
petros
+1
#10526
If you want to see gun totin' murderous yokels, take a holiday in Central and S. America.

Don't wander too far from the tour group and the armed guards, those banditos will take you hostage.
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#10527
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Once you are DEAD does it really matter HOW the death was achieved?

Bloody right it makes a difference!! Dying at 90 in bed after a reasonably good life and dying as a youngster or young person just starting out in comparison stinks!!
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#10528
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

If you want to see gun totin' murderous yokels, take a holiday in Central and S. America.

Don't wander too far from the tour group and the armed guards, those banditos will take you hostage.

LOL....Went in the 80's to Columbia and saw a lot of beggars and young children hanging on the sides of buses selling T-shirts as well as trinkets through open bus windows on mountainous roads!! No guns.

Also was more than a bit horrified when we stopped for a couple couple of hours discovered the bus driver had the bus motor in pieces on the road back of the bus in pieces, Was astounded when we arrived to return to our base, it was fine and running beautifully.

Even so I felt safer then, there, than at times I have felt when visiting in the US recently.
 
Colpy
Conservative
#10529
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

LOL....Went in the 80's to Columbia and saw a lot of beggars and young children hanging on the sides of buses selling T-shirts as well as trinkets through open bus windows on mountainous roads!! No guns.

Also was more than a bit horrified when we stopped for a couple couple of hours discovered the bus driver had the bus motor in pieces on the road back of the bus in pieces, Was astounded when we arrived to return to our base, it was fine and running beautifully.

Even so I felt safer then, there, than at times I have felt when visiting in the US recently.


USA: Guns per 100 people: 120.5


Columbia: Guns per 100 people: 10.1


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estima...ita_by_country



Murder rate USA: 5.35 per 100,000


Murder rate Columbia: 25.5 per 100,000


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate



Who needs guns?
Last edited by Colpy; Dec 17th, 2018 at 05:10 PM..
 
Hoid
#10530
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Dimwit.


As I explained earlier, "gun murder" statistics are a manipulation of the facts by goose-stepping fascist creeps that hate liberty.


If you can not show a lessening of MURDER rates (full stop) by strict gun control, you have no case.

the term is "gun death"

please get a new persona. your angry old white guy is getting stale.