Collusion

Bar Sinister
No Party Affiliation
+1 / -1
#301
This is interesting.

Seth Rich Case: Fox News Made Fake News to Protect Trump, Lawsuit Alleges



Seth Rich Case: Fox News Made Fake News to Protect Trump, Lawsuit Alleges - NBC News
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#302
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

This is interesting.

Seth Rich Case: Fox News Made Fake News to Protect Trump, Lawsuit Alleges



Seth Rich Case: Fox News Made Fake News to Protect Trump, Lawsuit Alleges - NBC News

indeed it is. Rather Convoluted too.
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+1
#303
Well well well,now we know that seth rich was the leaker ( like I said the whole time), it was never the russians!
That was all a hillary excuse to cover her own collusion and other crimes.

No coup for youp

Audio: Seymour Hersh States Seth Rich Was WikiLeaks Source
( Hersh cites an FBI document as proof for his claim.)
Audio: Seymour Hersh States Seth Rich Was WikiLeaks Source - Big League Politics

Yeah the pulitzer winner guy who broke the Mai lei massacre Vs Mueller the guy who needed to be granted immunity for what he did during 911, and the fbi who has been busted faking terror ( many times!) and the CIA that said there was yellowcake uranium and WMDs in Iraq, and who are the biggest dope dealers on the planet..

Funny those servers were never properly investigated and the people who did look at them recanted their story too - then there is the pissgate leaker involved with democrats, the russian lawyer too ...
LOL
oh dear...
Last edited by Danbones; Aug 4th, 2017 at 09:32 AM..
 
mentalfloss
-1
#304
In real news..


Source: Mueller Using D.C. Grand Jury In Russia Probe : NPR
 
Corduroy
+1
#305
I'd love to see him fire Mueller now.
 
Bar Sinister
No Party Affiliation
#306
Quote: Originally Posted by Corduroy View Post

I'd love to see him fire Mueller now.

He can't. Congress passed a motion preventing the Dumpster from taking any action regarding Mueller or Sessions without its permission.
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#307
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

He can't. Congress passed a motion preventing the Dumpster from taking any action regarding Mueller or Sessions without its permission.

Indeed. And a good thing too. Self protection from an erratic POTUS. Smart move.
 
Walter
-1
#308
No posts here for a while.
 
Angstrom
No Party Affiliation
+2
#309
The racist white haters have founded other threads to spread their hate of white people
 
Walter
+1 / -1
#310
How are the Dems gonna try to save face when Mueller’s investigation ends? No collusion will be found.
 
petros
+1
#311
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

No posts here for a while.

Could have had a baby by now.
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
+1
#312




BREAKING NEWS

The Democratic Party filed a lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by Russian officials, the Trump campaign and Wikileaks to damage the Clinton campaign




https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/20/u...797097&gwt=pay


what took them so long???


********

More on same:


Democratic Party files lawsuit alleging Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks conspired to disrupt the 2016 campaign

The Democratic National Committee alleges that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and tilt the election to Donald Trump by hacking the computer networks of the Democratic Party and disseminating stolen material found there. The multimillion-dollar lawsuit was filed in a federal district court in Manhattan.

The lawsuit echoes a similar legal tactic that the Democratic Party used during the Watergate scandal. In 1972, the DNC filed suit against former President Richard Nixon��s reelection committee seeking $1 million in damages for the break-in at Democratic headquarters in the Watergate building.
Last edited by Ocean Breeze; Apr 20th, 2018 at 12:07 PM..
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+1
#313
No truth and no evidence.

LOL, It's telling truth which ruined the clinton campaign, and even at THAT, most people only know about 10% of it. At this point it's easy to see why the democrats would want to sue over that.
 
Walter
+1 / -1
#314
Quote: Originally Posted by Corduroy View Post

I'd love to see him fire Mueller now.

Eight months later and nothing.

Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post





BREAKING NEWS

The Democratic Party filed a lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by Russian officials, the Trump campaign and Wikileaks to damage the Clinton campaign




https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/20/u...797097&gwt=pay


what took them so long???


********

More on same:


Democratic Party files lawsuit alleging Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks conspired to disrupt the 2016 campaign

The Democratic National Committee alleges that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and tilt the election to Donald Trump by hacking the computer networks of the Democratic Party and disseminating stolen material found there. The multimillion-dollar lawsuit was filed in a federal district court in Manhattan.

The lawsuit echoes a similar legal tactic that the Democratic Party used during the Watergate scandal. In 1972, the DNC filed suit against former President Richard Nixon��s reelection committee seeking $1 million in damages for the break-in at Democratic headquarters in the Watergate building.

So this is how they’ll try and save face. Tis to laugh.
 
petros
#315
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post





BREAKING NEWS

The Democratic Party filed a lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by Russian officials, the Trump campaign and Wikileaks to damage the Clinton campaign




https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/20/u...797097&gwt=pay


what took them so long???


********

More on same:


Democratic Party files lawsuit alleging Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks conspired to disrupt the 2016 campaign

The Democratic National Committee alleges that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and tilt the election to Donald Trump by hacking the computer networks of the Democratic Party and disseminating stolen material found there. The multimillion-dollar lawsuit was filed in a federal district court in Manhattan.

The lawsuit echoes a similar legal tactic that the Democratic Party used during the Watergate scandal. In 1972, the DNC filed suit against former President Richard Nixon��s reelection committee seeking $1 million in damages for the break-in at Democratic headquarters in the Watergate building.

That my dear is called a hedge.
 
Hoid
#316
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

How are the Dems gonna try to save face when Mueller’s investigation ends? No collusion will be found.

It's a Republican Investigation.

Now the lawsuit alledging Russian/Trump campaign collusion THATs the dems
 
petros
+2
#317
If Mueller can't prove anything but the Democrats can?

Are they obstructing justice by holding back evidence that can prove collusion or are they packing a basket of fruit of the poisonous tree?
 
EagleSmack
+2
#318
Ahhhhh.... the salt flows endlessly from the DNC.

This will be a money draining suit and the DNC doesn't have a lot of it these days.
 
Twila
+1
#319
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

How are the Dems gonna try to save face when Mueller’s investigation ends? No collusion will be found.

Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

It's a Republican Investigation.

Now the lawsuit alledging Russian/Trump campaign collusion THATs the dems

You know that Walter's:
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#320
Quote: Originally Posted by Twila View Post

You know that Walter's:

That is GOOD, Twila , very good indeed.
 
Walter
-1
#321
All under BHO's watch.
John Brennan's Secret Trip to Moscow
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...to_moscow.html
 
Hoid
#322
Walter is sweating out the pee pee tape
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#323
FBI Texts: 'Catastro****' Trump Nearly Drove Agents to Quit

Quote:

Forty-nine new pages of text messages between two FBI agents who investigated potential ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin were turned over to Congress on Thursday. The exchanges — once thought to have been lost in an FBI-wide glitch — further reveal the antipathy both agents felt towards the newly elected president, as well as the dread they felt following his firing of the FBI director.
The tranche of messages exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, provided to Congress and reviewed by The Daily Beast, were sent between December 16, 2016 and May 23, 2017 — the period including President Donald Trump’s inauguration, his firing of FBI Director James Comey, and the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the investigation into Russian election interference.
The texts paint a portrait of two beleaguered federal employees who were equal parts anguished by and aghast at Trump’s election, torn between “our strong but flawed organization” and a “catastrophuck” president.
“I kept telling myself the organization is much bigger and stronger than any one person, that we’ll endure,” Strzok texted Page four days after Comey’s unceremonious firing. “But that didn’t seem to help.”
The messages were originally thought to be deleted, casualties of a glitch impacting roughly ten percent of FBI cellular devices. They were later recovered, however, with the use of forensic tools by the Justice Department’s inspector general, who is currently heading up an investigation into the FBI’s investigations into both Clinton’s emails and Russian interference in the election.
Both Strzok, the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, and Page, a fellow FBI employee with whom he was romantically involved, were removed from Mueller’s team after the special counsel was informed of these and other messages between the two that criticized Trump. Some Republicans have pointed to the exchanges as evidence that Mueller’s team is irreparably biased against the president, who told the Wall Street Journal in January that Strzok had committed a “treasonous act” by suggesting before the election that the FBI aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Trump’s campaign and the Kremlin.
“This is the FBI we’re talking about — that is treason,” Trump said at the time. “That is a treasonous act. What he tweeted to his lover is a treasonous act.”
While the newly revealed text messages further show the personal contempt in which Strzok and Page held Trump, they do not provide any apparent evidence that the duo was part of a “secret society” conspiring to undermine the president — as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) first suggested upon the release of the first batch of text messages in February.

Quote:

In their exchanges — in which Page called Trump an “idiot” and “a douche,” among other insults — Strzok and Page had also criticized liberals, including Hillary Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Eric Holder, and Bernie Sanders. Former colleagues have denied that Strzok was biased in his official role on the Mueller team, and Strzok had also told Page at one point that “my gut sense and concern is there’s no big there there.”
That “gut sense” did not prevent the pair from venting about the president, particularly in the early days of his administration, when they exchanged a music playlist of songs from nations whose citizens had been banned from entering the United States and mocked the president’s early-morning Twitter rants.
“You see the tweet about the Seattle judge?” Strzok texted on February 5, one day after Trump called into question the legitimacy of a federal judge who temporarily blocked his travel ban by calling him a “so-called judge.”
By mid-May, the morning of a Trump tweet storm in which he called the investigation into potential collusion “the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!” neither agent could muster more than shock.
“Wow. Wow wow wow,” Page texted that morning. “Sad for me, even Bob Mueller can’t stop the 4:20 wakeups.”
“How far we’ve gone...” Page texted on February 27, linking to a New York Times article noting former President George W. Bush’s criticism of Trump’s nascent presidency.
“Yeah we’re pretty much a catastrophuck right now,” Strzok responded, quoting a source in another Times article who said of Trump that the Russians “think he is unstable, that he can be manipulated.”
Investigations into the Trump campaign’s potential links to Russian intelligence were a frequent topic of conversation between the two agents, even in the early days of the Trump administration. Less than a week after Trump’s inauguration, Page texted Strzok an ominous “It begins…” linking to a Times article titled “Russian Charged with Treason Worked in Office Linked to Election Hacking.”
The pair’s hostility to Trump — and apparent frustration with their work at the FBI — peaked in the aftermath of Comey’s firing.
“We need to lock in [redacted],” Page texted Strzok at 5:29 a.m. on May 10, the morning after Comey’s firing was announced. “In a formal chargeable way. Soon.”
“I agree,” Strzok replied. “I’ve been pushing.”
Later that day, a press briefing in which then-Deputy White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Comey had committed “atrocities” during his time at the FBI prompted another outburst of incredulity.

Quote:

“Are you watching this s**t?!??” Strzok texted. “Huckabee said [Comey] had ‘lost confidence of rank and file of fbi’.”
Strzok and Page’s deeply held frustrations — evident throughout the 49 pages of texts reviewed by The Daily Beast — crested the week of Comey’s firing.
“Lisa, don’t think for a second that you’re not extraordinarily excellent at what you do,” Strzok texted Page in a pep talk the day before Comey’s firing. “Don’t doubt yourself. You’re awesome. And don’t quit. I get the impulse, I’m there with you, but don’t quit. Need you in the foxhole.”
“F the foxhole,” Page replied. “I’m done with the greater good. It’s not worth this.”
After Comey’s departure, the mood between Strzok and Page became even more grim.
“Having a tough time processing tomight [sic], Lis,” Strzok texted Page at nearly midnight that Saturday. “Feeling a profound sense of loss.”
“I feel that same loss,” Page replied. “I want to see what the FBI could become under him! His vision of greatness for our strong but flawed organization. I’m angry. Angry and mourning.”
“We will endure,” Page continued, “we just won’t be as good.”

 
Walter
+1 / -1
#324
New House Intel Report Shows No Collusion Between Russia and Trump Campaign
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...usion-n2475288
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+3
#325
Will Mueller open an investigation into Trump colluding with China/Russia for peace in the Korea's?
 
petros
+1
#326
July 25 2016

When mass protests against Russian President Vladimir Putin erupted in Moscow in December 2011, Putin made clear who he thought was really behind them: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

With the protesters accusing Putin of having rigged recent elections, the Russian leader pointed an angry finger at Clinton, who had issued a statement sharply critical of the voting results. “She said they were dishonest and unfair,” Putin fumed in public remarks, saying that Clinton gave “a signal” to demonstrators working “with the support of the U.S. State Department” to undermine his power. “We need to safeguard ourselves from this interference in our internal affairs,” Putin declared.

Five years later, Putin may be seeking revenge against Clinton. At least that’s the implication of the view among some cybersecurity experts that Russia was behind the recent hack of the Democratic National Committee’s email server, which has sowed confusion and dissent at the Democratic National Convention and undercut Clinton’s goal of party unity.

While Donald Trump’s budding bromance with Vladimir Putin is well known — the two men have exchanged admiring words about each other and called for improved relations between Washington and Moscow — Putin’s hostility towards Clinton draws less attention.

Former U.S. officials who worked on Russia policy with Clinton say that Putin was personally stung by Clinton’s December 2011 condemnation of Russia’s parliamentary elections, and had his anger communicated directly to President Barack Obama. They say Putin and his advisers are also keenly aware that, even as she executed Obama’s “reset” policy with Russia, Clinton took a harder line toward Moscow than others in the administration. And they say Putin sees Clinton as a forceful proponent of “regime change” policies that the Russian leader considers a grave threat to his own survival.

“He was very upset [with Clinton] and continued to be for the rest of the time that I was in government,” said Michael McFaul, who served as the top Russia official in Obama’s national security council from 2009 to December 2011 and then was U.S. ambassador to Moscow until early 2014. “One could speculate that this is his moment for payback.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...n-putin-226153
 
Twila
#327
U.S. Senate committee OKs bill to safeguard special counsel Robert Mueller

Republicans have split on the issue amid U.S. President Donald Trump’s repeated criticism of Mueller’s Russia investigation. That break was apparent Thursday as four Republicans joined Democrats in the 14-7 vote to pass the legislation from committee. For now, the move is largely symbolic, given McConnell’s opposition, but it shows the complexity of Republican support for Trump when it comes to the president’s attacks on Mueller



the rest.
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2...l-counsel.html
 
Walter
+2 / -1
#328
Mueller’s been at it a year now and still no indictments for collusion with the Russians. What a waste of time and money.
 
Yo0
No Party Affiliation
#329


Truefully or we got president Trump 2 plus age more in white house.
 
Walter
+2 / -1
#330
Troll.
 

Similar Threads

824
Russian Collusion
by Tecumsehsbones | Feb 25th, 2020
2
Hussein/Al Qaeda Collusion a Fabrication
by Vanni Fucci | Oct 28th, 2005