Guatemala's Volcano of Fire shoots ash 10km into air


darkbeaver
+1
#1
25 killed, dozens injured & missing after Guatemala's Volcano of Fire shoots ash 10km into air http://www.rt.com/news/428609-guatemala-volcano-fire-eruption/

At least 25 people have been killed and dozens injured, after the Volcan de Fuego in Guatemala erupted, shooting smoke and rocks 10 km into the air and forcing a mass exodus from nearby villages blanketed by ash.
Twenty-five people have been reported dead, mainly in the community of El Rodeo, the National Coordinator for Disaster Reduction in Guatemala (Conred) confirmed, while at least another 20 were injured. Local reports indicate that some 2,000 people have fled the area.
At least two of the victims were children, who burned to death while standing on a bridge watching the eruption unfold, according to the head of Conred Sergio Cabanas.
 
Bar Sinister
+2 / -1
#2
I wonder how long it will take the volcano deniers to start spouting their nonsense.
 
Blackleaf
+1
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

I wonder how long it will take the volcano deniers to start spouting their nonsense.

Are there such people?
 
Bar Sinister
+1 / -1
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by Blackleaf View Post

Are there such people?


Yes, but right now they are fixated on denying climate
change.
 
Walter
+2
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

Yes, but right now they are fixated on denying climate
change.

Yer an asshole.
 
Bar Sinister
+3
#6  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

Yer an asshole.




Coming from you I'll take that as a compliment.
 
White_Unifier
+1 / -1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

Coming from you I'll take that as a compliment.

I feel a reddie coming your way.
 
darkbeaver
+1
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

I wonder how long it will take the volcano deniers to start spouting their nonsense.




I,ll wait for your posts concerning these matters volcanic. What would be your explication of this uptick in hot and hotter running rock? I may be alarmist but it seems to me that the prospect of being volcanized while mowing the lawn is not such streatch.
 
darkbeaver
+1
#9
More volcanic activity more global cooling, crop losses, general fukedupidness, global warming is out of the question bullshit

Turn up the heat.
 
Torch light
-1
#10
The center of the earth will certainly cool, but the surface may have the global warming: the surface and the atmosphere.

Coming somewhat nearer to the sun results from the cooling earth center, and such 'coming nearer to the sun' will cause the global warming.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...aches_the_Sun_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Earth_Approaches_the_Sun_
 
captain morgan
+1
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

I,ll wait for your posts concerning these matters volcanic. What would be your explication of this uptick in hot and hotter running rock? I may be alarmist but it seems to me that the prospect of being volcanized while mowing the lawn is not such streatch.


BS is right, man made global warming is the #1 cause of volcanic activity and tooth decay globally.

It's a fact dontcha know
 
darkbeaver
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light View Post

The center of the earth will certainly cool, but the surface may have the global warming: the surface and the atmosphere.

Coming somewhat nearer to the sun results from the cooling earth center, and such 'coming nearer to the sun' will cause the global warming.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...aches_the_Sun_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Earth_Approaches_the_Sun_


The Sun is not a constant fixed fusion reaction, the Sun is electrically variable and interconnected to the galaxy and beyond which is also electrically variable, the present Solar minimum is the result of weakening primer fields affecting electrical input to this galaxy at this time and is not at all about any tiny anthropogenic action or lack of. Because of the Suns and the Earths weakening magnetic fields more hard cosmic radiation will promote more cloud formation on earth and greater reflection of sunlight resulting in decreasing temperature for about fifty years give or take a decade, if we,re very lucky and this cycle is not to be fivehundred years long.

Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

Yes, but right now they are fixated on denying climate
change.


I don,t personally know anyone who denies climate change and I,m puzzled about your repeated use of the meaningless allegation of climate denier.
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

I,ll wait for your posts concerning these matters volcanic. What would be your explication of this uptick in hot and hotter running rock? I may be alarmist but it seems to me that the prospect of being volcanized while mowing the lawn is not such streatch.

We haven't been sacrificing enough virgins. They are getting pretty hard to find, you know.
 
darkbeaver
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

We haven't been sacrificing enough virgins. They are getting pretty hard to find, you know.


It didn,t work in the old days and it won,t work now. However there will be great sacrifice and great dispare and great famine and great migrations and war seeming without end. These volcanic eruptions will cost us sunlight which will cost us heat and result in poor crop cultivation already the global downturn in agriculture is very serious losses are in the hundreds of billions of dollars. This past Friday the tempurature here was thirty C today it is six C and there was frost damage last night, apples strawberries veggies anything that wasn,t covered.
 
Hoid
#15
Isn't volcano of fire redundant?
 
Danbones
#16
Not while you are on the internet drowning in a volcano of porn it isn't...

figuratively speaking of course.
 
Torch light
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

The Sun is not a constant fixed fusion reaction, the Sun is electrically variable and interconnected to the galaxy and beyond which is also electrically variable, the present Solar minimum is the result of weakening primer fields affecting electrical input to this galaxy at this time and is not at all about any tiny anthropogenic action or lack of. Because of the Suns and the Earths weakening magnetic fields more hard cosmic radiation will promote more cloud formation on earth and greater reflection of sunlight resulting in decreasing temperature for about fifty years give or take a decade, if we,re very lucky and this cycle is not to be fivehundred years long.

It could be that there are such factors like the electricity.

But the point remains: the distance between the Sun and the Earth has much significance.

Such distance between the Earth and the Sun depends on the amount of heat (energy) of each of the earth and the sun.

Certainly the cooling of the Earth center due to volcano eruptions and to heat radiation .. such cooling has a relation to making the distance between the Sun and the Earth (and the same is true for the rest of the planets.)

So why don't you want to consider these points, and stick only to the electric factor with exclusion of other factors like the heat of any object: its causes and its consequences?

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...far_from_the_s
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Why_the_planet_is_near_or_far_from_ the_s
 
darkbeaver
#18
Aerosols, Cloud Nucleation and Global Dimming ... Large volcanic eruptions spew vast clouds of fine ash particles into the air, ... Dust, volcanic ash, . and we don,t get no sunshine
 
Torch light
#19
This is local and temporary, but the consequence of frequent volcano eruptions will lead to gradual loss of the earth central heat.
 
darkbeaver
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light View Post

It could be that there are such factors like the electricity.

But the point remains: the distance between the Sun and the Earth has much significance.

Such distance between the Earth and the Sun depends on the amount of heat (energy) of each of the earth and the sun.

Certainly the cooling of the Earth center due to volcano eruptions and to heat radiation .. such cooling has a relation to making the distance between the Sun and the Earth (and the same is true for the rest of the planets.)

So why don't you want to consider these points, and stick only to the electric factor with exclusion of other factors like the heat of any object: its causes and its consequences?

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...far_from_the_s
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Why_the_planet_is_near_or_far_from_ the_s


The heat you mention is the result of electricity, vast Birkeland currents of enormous capacity.
 
Torch light
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

The heat you mention is the result of electricity, vast Birkeland currents of enormous capacity.

The heat is because of the movement of the internal particles of the object, which will cause friction and increased heat.

Anyhow, the heat is undeniable indicator to decide many things:
1- the hot object spins around itself, while the cold one does not spin.
2- the hot object attracts the cold object .. like the sun with the earth, and the earth with the moon.
3- the cold object does not attract any object.
4- the big hot object attracts the small hot object: like the Sun with the Earth.
5- the smaller the object the nearer it will be from the hot attracting object: like Mercury with the Sun.
And the bigger the object, the farther it is from the hot object.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...stial_Objects_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#A_Rule_for_Celestial_Objects_
 
darkbeaver
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light View Post

The heat is because of the movement of the internal particles of the object, which will cause friction and increased heat.

Anyhow, the heat is undeniable indicator to decide many things:
1- the hot object spins around itself, while the cold one does not spin.
2- the hot object attracts the cold object .. like the sun with the earth, and the earth with the moon.
3- the cold object does not attract any object.
4- the big hot object attracts the small hot object: like the Sun with the Earth.
5- the smaller the object the nearer it will be from the hot attracting object: like Mercury with the Sun.
And the bigger the object, the farther it is from the hot object.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...stial_Objects_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#A_Rule_for_Celestial_Objects_


What do you claim causes the internal movement of your suggested particles? No matter anywhere in space is isolated from electromagnetic charge.
 
Bar Sinister
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

We haven't been sacrificing enough virgins. They are getting pretty hard to find, you know.




Sacrifice CM. His brain is virgin territory.
 
darkbeaver
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light View Post

This is local and temporary, but the consequence of frequent volcano eruptions will lead to gradual loss of the earth central heat.




Many of the past extinction events were local and temporary.
 
Danbones
+1
#25
Well a couple more solar/ lunar hi roller ash clouds and there goes global cooling to the north...

while in comes global freezing from the south.




Primate change is real!
 
taxslave
+1
#26
Are they paying the carbon tax on their volcano? What about mitigation for other gasses such as H2S?
 
Danbones
#27
"Once I had a love and it was a gas..." - Blondie
 
Kreskin
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

I wonder how long it will take the volcano deniers to start spouting their nonsense.

That is not a volcano; it's a boil on God's ass.
 
Torch light
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

What do you claim causes the internal movement of your suggested particles? No matter anywhere in space is isolated from electromagnetic charge.

I agree with the electric factor causing the movement; why don't you agree with the real result: the heat which will cause many things!? So what we see is the heat and its consequences; can you deny this?

Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

Well a couple more solar/ lunar hi roller ash clouds and there goes global cooling to the north...

while in comes global freezing from the south.

It is not the global freezing from the south .. but the manifestation of the Global Warmth is more on the north pole than on the south pole: the same also is on the poles of Mars.

Quote: Originally Posted by Kreskin View Post

That is not a volcano; ....

Be careful then for your as* ; you foolish ho ho ho... but tell us if any consequences of your blasphemy; don't keep it secret.
 
darkbeaver
#30
[QUOTE=Torch light;2627054]I agree with the electric factor causing the movement; why don't you agree with the real result: the heat which will cause many things!? So what we see is the heat and its consequences; can you deny this?


The alleged two things are one thing, plasma.




It is not the global freezing from the south .. but the manifestation of the Global Warmth is more on the north pole than on the south pole: the same also is on the poles of Mars.


There has been no manifestation of global warming since about 2012 or earlier. Ice accumulation at the North Pole and temperature is high normal , greater than the last three years. Ice bergs are quite prolific this season, ice bergs are made to break off by the weight of accumulation behind them and has sweet fuk all to do with any imaginary melting north pole. There are many ancient texts decribing Gods thunderbolts and his searing hot winds and his fire and brimstone, in the very near future these features of solar magnetic field decline and increased cosmic radiation influx will make these old so called myths very real to the rapidly dwindling witnesses. So help me God.