Lockheed Martin Now Has a Patent For Its Potentially World Changing Fusion Reactor


Danbones
#1
Lockheed Martin Now Has a Patent For Its Potentially World Changing Fusion Reactor

When it first announced the project, the company said it could have a working prototype of the revolutionary power source as early as 2019.

Lockheed Martin has quietly obtained a patent associated with its design for a potentially revolutionary compact fusion reactor, or CFR. If this project has been progressing on schedule, the company could debut a prototype system that size of shipping container, but capable of powering a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier or 80,000 homes, sometime in the next year or so.

The patent, for a portion of the confinement system, or embodiment, is dated Feb. 15, 2018. The Maryland-headquartered defense contractor had filed a provisional claim on April 3, 2013 and a formal application nearly a year later. Our good friend Stephen Trimble, chief of Flightglobal's Americas Bureau, subsequently spotted it and Tweeted out its basic details.

In 2014, the company also made a splash by announcing they were working on the device at all and that it was the responsibility of its Skunk Works advanced projects office in Palmdale, California. At the time, Dr. Thomas McGuire, head of the Skunk Works’ Compact Fusion Project, said the goal was to have a working reactor in five years and production worthy design within 10.




“The problem with tokamaks is that “they can only hold so much plasma, and we call that the beta limit,” McGuire says. Measured as the ratio of plasma pressure to the magnetic pressure, the beta limit of the average tokamak is low, or about “5% or so of the confining pressure,” he says. Comparing the torus to a bicycle tire, McGuire adds, ‘if they put too much in, eventually their confining tire will fail and burst—so to operate safely, they don’t go too close to that.’ …

The CFR will avoid these issues by tackling plasma confinement in a radically different way. Instead of constraining the plasma within tubular rings, a series of superconducting coils will generate a new magnetic-field geometry in which the plasma is held within the broader confines of the entire reaction chamber. Superconducting magnets within the coils will generate a magnetic field around the outer border of the chamber. ‘So for us, instead of a bike tire expanding into air, we have something more like a tube that expands into an ever-stronger wall,’ McGuire says. The system is therefore regulated by a self-tuning feedback mechanism, whereby the farther out the plasma goes, the stronger the magnetic field pushes back to contain it. The CFR is expected to have a beta limit ratio of one. ‘We should be able to go to 100% or beyond,’ he adds.”

If the system works, it’s hard to underscore just how dramatically it could change not just the future of warfare, but the basic nature of human existence. Running on approximately 25 pounds of fuel – a mixture of hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium – Lockheed Martin estimated the notional reactor would be able to run for an entire year without stopping. The device would be able to generate a constant 100 megawatts of power during that period.

According to the company website on the CFR, the reactor could be powerful enough to run an aircraft carrier, power a plane the size of a C-5 Galaxy airlifter, provide electricity to cities with anywhere from 50 to 100,000 people, and maybe even speed up a trip to Mars. In each case, the compact reactor would take the place of large conventional fuel systems or fission reactors, eliminating weight and bulk. This in turn could create trade space for additional system or carrying capacity in terms of personnel or materiel or potentially allow for a more energy efficient overall shape or design.


http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone...fusion-reactor


Well, this ought to mess the global harmists right up completely
 
Bar Sinister
#2
I won't hold my breath over its development, but more bad news for big oil and big coal.
 
Curious Cdn
#3
Now, if they can only get it to produce more energy than it consumes, .....
 
Danbones
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

I won't hold my breath over its development, but more bad news for big oil and big coal.

They are a bit big for a car.


Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Now, if they can only get it to produce more energy than it consumes, .....

Quote:

Running on approximately 25 pounds of fuel – a mixture of hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium – Lockheed Martin estimated the notional reactor would be able to run for an entire year without stopping. The device would be able to generate a constant 100 megawatts of power during that period

I take it you didn't read the article, short as it was...
 
petros
+2
#5  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister View Post

I won't hold my breath over its development, but more bad news for big oil and big coal.

Why? Why would an oil or coal company give a shit?
 
Danbones
#6
The main thing is to get rid of the plutonium bomb making fukushimas and chernobyls
 
Bar Sinister
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

Why? Why would an oil or coal company give a shit?

An endless supply of clean energy from a non-fossil fuels source? You wondering where all the energy is going to come from, well that might be the answer. And it would not have the drawbacks of wind or solar.
 
Danbones
+1
#8
Until they give recreational vehicles batteries the size and weight of a normal gas tank there will be gas engines.

Any state that over regulates all that will be like california and fail because they do that to everything they can in order to control and rape it all.