Clinton Will Participate in Steinís State Recounts


Danbones
Free Thinker
+1
#1
Clinton Campaign Will Participate in Steinís State Recounts

Hillary Clintonís campaign lawyer announced plans to participate in vote recounts of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan if they take place, yet doesnít expect to overturn the election of Donald Trump as president.

If Green Party candidate Jill Stein initiates recounts in all of those states as she intends, the Clinton campaign ďwill participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides,Ē lawyer Marc Elias said Saturday in a post on the blogging website Medium.com.
Clinton Campaign Will Participate in Stein’s State Recounts - Bloomberg Politics

geeez
stay dead
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#2
So, if widespread voter fraud and fiddling by Herr Drumpf, the Russians and his goons is discovered, what happens next?
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+2
#3
lol
the tooth fairy will jump over the moon?
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+2
#4
lol
the tooth fairy will jump over the moon?
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

lol
the tooth fairy will jump over the moon?

Loopy Land will come apart at the seams.
 
Scooby
+1
#6
1/2 a billion guns are loaded...
 
MHz
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Loopy Land will come apart at the seams.

You even named your basement, how precious.

Nothing suspicious about the donations coming in at the rate of $160,000/hr., . . . at the top of each and every hour. They better hope it doesn't cause some other States to demand a recount in which Hillary barely won.
 
Ludlow
No Party Affiliation
+1
#8
Ohhhhh,,,who can I turn to,,,when nobody needs me,,,,
 
MHz
+1
#9
You are just asking that question now? How many years has that been the case or should we just use your join date as the approximate time?
 
Ludlow
No Party Affiliation
#10
LOL. Gotta love Tony Bennett and the great Anthony Newley. Gawd damn you're retarded Megaloon. LOL
 
darkbeaver
Republican
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by Ludlow View Post

LOL. Gotta love Tony Bennett and the great Anthony Newley. Gawd damn you're retarded Megaloon. LOL

Where's the Tony Bennet links?
 
Mowich
Conservative
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

Where's the Tony Bennet links?

On the golf course
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#13
damn...
sausage and politics
lol
and here they are, being made on the same thread....
 
Locutus
#14
Flashback: Clinton Called Not Accepting Election Results 'Horrifying' [Video] | The Daily Caller
 
davesmom
#15
Not hard to see who the real phonies are.
When Trump was saying the system is rigged, Democrats were saying, 'That's ridiculous. He's just saying that because he's behind in the polls'.
Now Trump has won the Democrats are saying the system is rigged.. Clinton's loss is the fault of system, Russia, Comey, everyone except Clinton and the rest of the Democrats.
And now they want the voting system changed.
KellyAnne Conway is right: 'What a bunch of sore losers'.


Then there's the Democrats like Romney who called Trump a liar, a phony, a fraud, not fit for public office, a danger to democracy, a misogynist, a bigot, a xenophobe. Now Trumps A-Okay because they might get a spot in his Administration.
Not even an apology offered for their scandalous attempts at character assassination!
If the tables were turned, they would be screaming for an apology for all the things Trump said about them.


So who're the phonies!
Last edited by davesmom; Nov 27th, 2016 at 10:59 AM..
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#16
When Trump was saying the system is rigged, Democrats were saying, 'That's ridiculous. He's just saying that because he's behind in the polls'.

.. or you can read in it that the Democrats thought it was ridiculous because they knew that the Democrats weren't rigging the election, but Trump knew that it was rigged by his side.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

So who're the phonies!


Whoever is behind this ridiculous recount (only one person I can think of)? Hillary has to gain 38 electoral votes, Wisconsin has 10, so her chances are +/- zero. There is no single state where the result is close that will do it. Total waste of time and money, especially for someone's perceived self importance!
 
davesmom
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Whoever is behind this ridiculous recount (only one person I can think of)? Hillary has to gain 38 electoral votes, Wisconsin has 10, so her chances are +/- zero. There is no single state where the result is close that will do it. Total waste of time and money, especially for someone's perceived self importance!



Jill Stein. She has some personal agenda and she's keeping her name in the headlines. Watch for her next move whatever it might be.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

Jill Stein. She has some personal agenda and she's keeping her name in the headlines. Watch for her next move whatever it might be.


Never heard of her until now. But I'm not exactly what you'd call a socialite.
 
Locutus
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post

So basically, only Loc, ES and Walter are left.

A new poll has Trump in fourth ó behind Gary Johnson AND Jill Stein ó with young people

Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

That would make sense - a lot of young people expect someone to hold their hand and wipe their nose!
The stats. above indicate Trump is still in there pretty solid!


Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Never heard of her until now

hey stupid...since you went out of your way to quote mentalcuck, this stein broad is pictured at the very top of that wapo article and she is mentioned EIGHT FUKKIN' TIMES throughout the article, including the STATS that you professed to have some knowledge about...since all that...oh never mind ya idiot.

oh and hey, perhaps you should pause before you reply to sh!t on this board.

give it a think.

then if you really must, for good reason...maybe read your little reply out loud to see how stupid it might sound.

just bein' helpful.
 
tay
+1
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Never heard of her until now. But I'm not exactly what you'd call a socialite.

Sooooooo, you didn't pay attention to the American election at all?


 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by tay View Post

Sooooooo, you didn't pay attention to the American election at all?


Actually I did but just from a Canadian's stand point and only the parts that interested me including a few sensible posts on Canadian Content and scads of stupid posts. Anyway I was able to glean enough to predict the Presidential outcome fairly close. Glad to see an entire trashy regime is gone.
 
Locutus
+2
#23



and...

Blog: The Democrats? real strategy in launching recounts
 
taxslave
Free Thinker
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

So, if widespread voter fraud and fiddling by Herr Drumpf, the Russians and his goons is discovered, what happens next?

The only voter fraud that has been proven is by the Clinton campaign yet oddly the media has been quiet about it.

Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Never heard of her until now. But I'm not exactly what you'd call a socialite.

Just one of a dozen unimportant also rans.
 
davesmom
#25
The Clinton campaign does itself more harm by participating/approving the recounts.
It seems to be widely agreed that it is a waste of time and money and that nothing will be gained from it.
All that needs to be done to eliminate voter fraud is update their records so that dead people can't vote and demand proper identification from voters.
The same people saying that the recounts are necessary to uncover voter fraud are also saying that it wasn't right to deny people without proper identification from voting.
That doesn't make any sense!
 
petros
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by Locutus View Post




and...

Blog: The Democrats? real strategy in launching recounts

Dirty...
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#27
In Canada, recounts are automatic if closer than N or N% votes.


As for the US election, every losing party has the right to request a recount. I have no issue as I don't believe it will come up with any different result. No amount of counting will give Jill a victory however.
 
EagleSmack
#28
I'll never get enough of the liberal tantrums.
 
MHz
#29
Since the leads are at a level that cannot be overcome what might happen is the vote count might be increased and the number would surpass the limit where the cost is picked up by the State and the recount start at the collection station so it cannot be rigged on a Statewide scale. If the vote error is higher than in the swing states that Hillary won with just a few votes then an automatic recount would be triggered and that crime took place at the highest levels rather than at the individual stations and that would mean Hillary and Obama and many others would have been actively involved in jiggling the numbers in an attempt that more support could be shown than what actually existed.

Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiing View Post

As for the US election, every losing party has the right to request a recount. I have no issue as I don't believe it will come up with any different result. No amount of counting will give Jill a victory however.

Who pays for it is the only difference. With this one it is Soros funded and Hillary is the media mouthpiece that explains the justification by adding her support, The money was donated at a set rate and when the price was reached it stopped. If it can be dragged out it will dominate the headlines in the US and with the coming boycott of 'false news sites' any other important items can be kept off the front page.
Orgy Island should become a series and clips from Gilligan's Island should be used to introduce the 'crime'. The 'staff' would actually be kidnapped girls and women and this is how the operation was run in one location.

https://www.truthorfiction.com/monic...ficking-haiti/

Summary of eRumor:
Monica Petersen, a woman working on behalf of the Human Trafficking Center, died in Haiti while investigating a possible human trafficking ring tied to the Clinton Foundation.
The Truth:
The Human Trafficking Center announced that Monica Petersen died in Haiti on November 13th; however, no cause of death was reported, and it’s not clear that Petersen was actually investigating a human trafficking ring involving the Clinton Foundation.
Those rumors began circulating on social media and Reddit shortly after the Human Trafficking Center announced on Facebook that Petersen had died in Haiti without providing further details about her death:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yODFMmhGOMs
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+1
#30
looks like wikileaks says its top level us hackers that have done Hillary in, not russians
 
EagleSmack
#31
Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

looks like wikileaks says its top level us hackers that have done Hillary in, not russians

I loved Assange's answer on NPR...



What is your source?

The DNC

No... where are you getting the information?

I just told you, our sources are the Democrats themselves. This information comes directly from Democrats and the DNC.



MSM HATES when they cannot control the message.