Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones
Sounds like misdemeanour assault. Is there some significance to the case I'm missing?
AS USUAL THERE IS MUCH YOU ARE MISSING!
A bunch of natives WHO ARE NEVER RACIST - just swarmed and attacked a LONE WHITE GUY!
Thus giving the LIE to LIE-beral claims that it is ONLY whites who are bigots!
As a self professed lawyer or maybe as a poorly trained security guard - you MIGHT be able to recognize the
INHERENT BIGOTRY of the latest LIE-beral effort to turn our Human Rights Kangaroo Court into the sort of institution capable
of putting on POLITICAL SHOW TRIALS for the benefit and education of the masses - which is LIE-beral Speak meaning
INTIMIDATE INTO SILENCE ANYBODY who even thinks of being critical of LIE-beral values!
Here is an article to illustrate that LIE-beral contempt for public opinion and general democracy is so severe that LIE-berals are now seeking to impose Mind Controls on us! With some comments of my own in brackets):
Lorry Goldstein says “Unconscious Racism” is the new McCarthyism.
From Toronto Sun. Published June 17, 2020
First there was racism. Then systemic racism. Now there’s unconscious racism.
(And how do you know if you are unconsciously racist? Our LIE-beral overlords will tell you - based on their own perceived BIASES and their politically motivated need to insult white people in exchange for votes from radical extremists and rabid union LEFTIES!)
(LIE-berals INSIST that we are all “systemic racists” in spite of our long term tolerance for messed up LIE-beral immigration policy that has resulted in our streets becoming crowded with LIE-beral selected immigration candidates who much prefer selling drugs, women and stolen property rather than being bothered performing honest tasks such as flipping burgers or something lame of that sort!)
For the average person, it’s an accusation of unconscious racism that’s the most dangerous in an era when being falsely accused of racism is the modern-day equivalent of being falsely accused of communism in the age of McCarthyism.
(Yes- various people have been publicly chastised for making quit innocuous remarks - such as the storm of protest that surrounds any Police chief who DARES to speak against the LIE-beral claim of systemic racism! LIE-beral BIAS is now curtailing freedom of speech - and doing so in defence of drunks and drug addicts and social disrupters such as the native chief who gave cops a hard time because HE HAD NOT BOTHERED to renew his vehicle plate sticker!)
So what does unconscious racism mean and what would it take for you to be found guilty of it by a human rights tribunal, if you were the subject, that is, the “respondent” of a complaint?
(Tv personality Jessica Mulroney could give us a clue! She is the wife of Ben Mulroney - and he is another tv personality and son of “Lyin` Brian Mulroney - former prime minister of Canada! So she has connections and whiners say she got onto her gig as host of a tv home decorating show by virtue of those connections and yes it is probably true - THAT SHE GOT A TRY OUT by virtue of the family name her hubby carries!)
(But a well known name - and one that many Cdns still get angry enough to SPIT at when they hear it since Lyin Brian is one of the most UNPOPULAR PM`s ever means such a name WILL NOT COMPENSATE for poor taste or awkward presence on camera! Talent IS REQUIRED! No doubt the famous name she carries got her in the door but ABILITY carries her!)
(So why the SOUR GRAPES from some black female influencer? The black woman who got Jessica Mulroney fired IS NOT a tv personality and is NOT IN LINE to become one now that Mulroney is gone! And the presence of Mulroney on tv has NOT blocked the career of Tracy Moore - the black tv personality on City tv!)
(As a white man with limited interest in either Cityline- the show Moore hosts nor any interest in the home renovation show that Mulroney hosted till she got fired because of that alleged “white privilege” CRAP - I HAD actually seen and heard a little of Moore- but was happily ignorant of the tv career of Mulroney! One HAS TO ASK - if “white privilege” is so very pervasive - then how did Moore get HER job? LIE-berals do NOT DEIGN to answer such questions!)
Unconscious racism means, according to an Ontario Human Rights Commission tribunal, that because “there will often be no direct evidence of discrimination; discrimination will more often be proven by circumstantial evidence and
(We are then to be CONVICTED based on “circumstantial evidence and INFERENCE”! Sure sounds like THOUGHT CONTROL TO ME! And LIE-berals who desire to convict - without the bother of finding solid evidence - will now INFER that we are GUILTY - simply because IT IS POLITICALLY EXPEDIENT for LIE-berals to have some “villains” to name and shame so as to bolster their virtue signalling Soviet Socialist Propaganda!)
(The IRONY in this is that LIE-berals become ENRAGED when people like me suggest that a typical Human Rights Court run by a LIE-beral judge - should RIGHTLY BE CONDEMNED as a Kangaroo Court - one that is far more concerned about alleged hurt feelings than fussing over any semblance of legal logic or responsibility! LIE-berals are attempting to force Soviet Socialist Show Trials on us for SHAMELESS Propaganda reasons! Just like Joe Stalin and his ilk!)
(Another fine example of LIE-beral thought control would be their ODIOUS M-103 “motion” that they attempted to use to SILENCE their critics by suggesting that being hostile to radical Muslim terrorists was some sort of BIGOTRY and that such alleged bias should be regulated by Human Rights Kangaroo Courts simply because LIE-berals have decided it is CHEAPER for them to buy the votes of Muslim immigrants - than to bother trying to sway the thinking of ordinary Cdns!)
As such, “there is no need to establish an intention or motivation to discriminate. Rather, “the effect of the respondent’s actions on the complainant” is what is significant.
(So some goof suffering from sour grapes will make the complaint - and some vote hungry LIE-beral judge will decide BASED ON circumstantial evidence AND INFERENCE and LIE-beral party convenience - whether you might be guilty? With double pressure being put on you to prove you are not guilty - by somehow producing HARD FACTS to dispute the bias and inference of a LIE-beral who feels that some public virtue signalling MIGHT BENEFIT THE PARTY!)
(The idea that a Cdn could be convicted of anything based merely on INFERENCE without any hard evidence at all - and for the accused to offer a defence that includes complaints that malevolent others - including PROSECUTORS - are TWISTING WORDS and distorting meanings and SUGGESTING WITHOUT PROOF or hard evidence that you MERELY WERE THINKING of some set values that LIE-berals deem unworthy is LEGAL INSANITY!)
(Franz Kafka would be RIGHT AT HOME in a Human Rights Kangaroo Court - where prosecutors can CONVICT YOU based only on HINTS AND SUGGESTIONS - while you MUST PRODUCE HARD EVIDENCE that their HINTS AND INFERENCES ARE INCORRECT!)