Gun Control is Completely Useless.


DaSleeper
#10531
Like heinz pickles you can't teach ideologues nuttin'
 
Colpy
Conservative
#10532
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

the term is "gun death"

please get a new persona. your angry old white guy is getting stale.


As soon as you come up with a new persona...........brain-dead 18 year old SJW living in momma's basement is getting stale.
 
JamesBondo
#10533
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

LOl You get a thumbs up for making me realize how silly I was for trying to point out that cave man laws have NO relative value in modern day. Explain how you feel carryng a gun would help against a missiles fired by a fully equipped army?

Please explain why a tyrranical government would want to missile their own people. Usually they want to tax the hell out of your commerce.
 
JamesBondo
#10534
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

See?
Do everyone a favor and leave this discussion to those who have something to say about it.
You are on record as saying there is no solution, therefore you have had your little say and you can move on to other important matters.

you are on record cowering whenever someone asks you for your solution
 
JamesBondo
+1
#10535
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Colpy, You must remember that old Heinz commercial from the 60's that ended with the tag line...
"You can't tell a Heinz pickle nuthin"
I kinda like this one
""Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. It'll just knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut about like it's won anyway."

If you ignore them, they will still knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut about like it's won anyway...but you will find the rule book heavily edited.
 
JamesBondo
#10536
[QUOTE=spilledthebeer;2685641]
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


SERIOUS ANSWER??????????????????????????????


To a LIE-beral????????????????????????????????


To a purveyor of Fake News??????????????????????

Here again is the article containing the quote from the Cdn law professor that CLERLY INDICATES that you and CBC are engaged in deliberate censorship of views hostile to LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And that you are using an unfair and deliberately distorted interpretation of "fair use" policy in your efforts to censor views that do not suit you!
Here is an older article illustrating civil service union Hog greed and just how much support they are prepared to give to LIE-berals in exchange for gravy. With some comments of my own in brackets):
Hubert Lacroix, the president of the CBC, recently placed the future of the Canada’s national public broadcaster on the electoral map with comments aimed at sparking a renewed debate on future funding models. Lacroix disputed claims that low ratings are to blame for the CBC’s financial struggles, instead pointing to the need to consider alternative fee schemes, including new levies on Internet providers or supplementary charges on television purchases.
(So greedy CBC Hogs want to pick the pockets of other businesses in order to salvage their own suddenly shaky place on the LIE-beral gravy train! Why should internet providers be made to pay because their viewers and users have chosen to TURN OFF CBC tv and radio? And considering how widely and rapidly the CBC article mocking the LIE-beral MyDemocracy website as “a box of doughnuts” circulated- it is entirely CLEAR that Cdns will listen to CBC IF it ever finds anything else relevant to say! And that is the trouble- CBC is so busy spouting LIE-beral propaganda that it as NOTHING REAL to say!)
While disagreement over CBC funding is as old as the broadcaster itself, the more uncomfortable discussion for the CBC is its coverage of the 2015 election campaign — particularly its approach to national debates and political party advertising — which raises troubling questions about its relevance in the current media environment.
(Meaning the 2015 federal election that brought Our idiot Boy Justin to power- which featured regular media efforts to smear Conservatives and aid Our idiot Boy and his moronic minons!)
Most would agree that the CBC features an excellent group of reporters and boasts insightful analysts for its panel discussions. However, rather than working to make itself an invaluable resource for the election, the CBC has been unnecessarily restrictive in its broadcasting choices and in the use of its content.
The problem is obvious- CBC DOES NOT WANT informed voters- it wants LIE-beral voters! It jumped on the MyDemocracy website as a one off chance to temporarily show its faux impartiality- about a subject that other media was so scornful of that CBC felt compelled to jump on the band wagon in an effort to cover its own ass!)
The most puzzling decision has been its refusal to broadcast debates hosted by other organizations. The CBC may be disappointed with the debate approach adopted by the political parties in this campaign, but that does not change the sense that if the national public broadcaster does not air programs in the national public interest, it calls into question the very need for a public broadcaster. Indeed, the CBC seems to have cut its nose off to spite its face by doing its best to prove its critics right.
(CBC is being typically Hoggish in refusing to accept debate programing that it did not produce and does not approve of because it does not contain LIE-beral bias! LIE-berals consider suitable debate to be a series of easy questions lobbed gently at them so they can knock it out of the park! Real debate with actually facts is something LIE-berals increasingly SHUN! CBC recognizes- as all Hogs do- that LIE-beral victory- meaning MORE GRAVY- is also a win for CBC- thus CBC DOES NOT WANT any critical examination of LIE-beral policy- for fear of discovering the ROT at its heart!)
The CBC’s odd coverage choices are not limited to the missing debates. Its use of video clips from the debates has also been unnecessarily restrictive. For example, before analyzing the recent Munk debates on the “At Issue” panel, host Peter Mansbridge warned viewers that “we are limited with the excerpts with the amount we are allowed to show.” A similar warning preceded the discussion at other debates.
Yet the reality is that there was no need to be restrictive in the use of video clips. Canadian copyright law permits the use of copyrighted works without permission as part of the fair dealing clause. News reporting is one of the enumerated purposes and even expanded clips would easily qualify under a fair dealing analysis.
(So CBC lied about its policy of deliberately limiting public debate!)
(HEY THERE JAMES BONDO- I DO HOPE YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD about using news clips and such AS THIS DOES MAKE YOU LOOK A FOOL!!!!! And it works for print media as well so long as the real author is given full credit as I always DO! And there is a further issue I am careful with- and that is NOT to put words into the mouth of another writer- it is for this reason that I always make it known that my comments are in brackets when I add words to an article!)
All news organizations are free to use as much of the video from debates as necessary to highlight key moments and positions of each leader. To suggest that the law creates significant limits on the ability to show debate clips is inaccurate.
In fact, the CBC’s misreading of the law is not limited to the use of clips within its news broadcasts.
Just prior to the election call, it asked YouTube and Facebook to remove a Conservative campaign advertisement that used clips from a CBC interview with Liberal leader Justin Trudeau. To support its takedown claim, the CBC argued that “no one – no individual candidate or political party, and no government, corporation or NGO – may re-use our creative and copyrighted property without our permission. This includes our brands, our talent and our content.”
That too is wrong.
(OH? MORE CBC/LIE-beral censorship and deliberate mis-representation of law and facts? And it relates to CBC being wrong about its crap on a paying site! Copyright law covering political comment on a FREE/NON profit site like this is even LOOSER! You have made yourself look foolish as usual!)
The law features important limitations on the rights of all copyright holders and all media organizations regularly rely on them in their reporting. The limits of copyright extend to campaign commercials and there is little that the CBC- or anyone else- can do about it.
With its rejection of the national debates, its limited use of debate clips and its attempts to limit re-use of its broadcast content, Canada’s national public broadcaster has marginalized itself during the election campaign at the very time that it could be demonstrating its relevance to the national political coverage.
(Worse- CBC has been caught deliberately trying to stack voter choice! Just as Our idiot Boy is trying to take over and paralyze our parliament with his idiot electoral reform!)
Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law.
(Geist has done us a favour by illustrating the ugly bias that CBC is trying to hide!)

I asked
On a scale of 0 - 100( 100 being awesome) where do you perceive your posts to be?

and you didnt answer. I have to agree with Tbones, you are a liar, and you are too much of a pussy to admit when you are wrong.
 
JamesBondo
#10537
and now you are a coward that wont answer a question about yourself.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#10538
[QUOTE=JamesBondo;2685696]
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post


I asked
On a scale of 0 - 100( 100 being awesome) where do you perceive your posts to be?

and you didnt answer. I have to agree with Tbones, you are a liar, and you are too much of a pussy to admit when you are wrong.

\


His biggest problems are lack of flexibility and versatility. Not EVERY Liberal is as he describes.
 
JamesBondo
+1
#10539
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

What's with you two evil hastards, anyway? Do you really WANT us to end up like the Americans?

Nope, I just want you to be more logical and objective.
 
JamesBondo
#10540
[QUOTE=JLM;2685699]
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

\
His biggest problems are lack of flexibility and versatility. Not EVERY Liberal is as he describes.

I'm not a liberal and its not my job to defend them. I'm more interested in STB's self assessment of his posts. Does he think he is a legend or something?
 
DaSleeper
#10541
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

Nope, I just want you to be more logical and objective.

I'm not a fan of Trump......I even compared him to a used car salesman when he first started to run as president, but this obsession of blaming everything on him would be tiresome if it wasn't so damn laughable,,,,,,this forum would be boring
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#10542
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

Nope, I just want you to be more logical and objective.

Oh, I get it. Ladders kill people so it logically follows that they are just as deadly as guns.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#10543
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Oh, I get it. Ladders kill people so it logically follows that they are just as deadly as guns.




Right on! You can't get any deader than dead. (Which proves he's a little smarter than you are C.C.)
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#10544
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Right on! You can't get any deader than dead. (Which proves he's a little smarter than you are C.C.)

You're with the "ladder lobby", eh?


Figures.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#10545
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

You're with the "ladder lobby", eh?


Figures.


Jump to conclusions much?
 
JamesBondo
#10546
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Oh, I get it. Ladders kill people so it logically follows that they are just as deadly as guns.

You are not helping your case
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#10547
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

You are not helping your case

I don't think give diddly squat what a gun-obscessed nut-bar like you thinks of me. I just hope that those who licence your ability to carry them in this country has opened a file on you.
 
JamesBondo
#10548
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

I don't think give diddly squat what a gun-obscessed nut-bar like you thinks of me. I just hope that those who licence your ability to carry them in this country has opened a file on you.

only took two posts to demonstrate and confirm my claims about you.

first you failed at logic and now you show no objectivity
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#10549
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

only took two posts to demonstrate and confirm my claims about you.
first you failed at logic and now you show no objectivity

I'm not a fan of death cults like the NRA, if that's what you mean.
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#10550
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

BTW this: The U.S. rate is more than 20 times the rate of Australia, France, the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland), Israel, South Korea, Japan, Norway, Poland and Slovenia is simply unadulterated bullshit.


The murder rate in the USA is 5.35 per 100,000.


To be a murder rate 1/20th or less than the USA a country would have to have a murder rate less than 0.267 per 100,000.


Australia: .44


France: 1.35


UK: 1.2


Israel: 1.36 (and people there carry guns)


South Korea: 0.7


Japan: 0.28 (close, but no cigar)


Norway: .51


Poland: 0.67


Slovenia: 0.48


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate



NOT ONE of the countries you list matches your claim.


I think you need to brush up on your math.


After you grow a brain.

What do you NOT understand about guns and death!! If you are dead by a gunshot, it does not matter if it was murder,suicide or accidental....you are dead. So forget about classifying only murder or homicide of any use in an discussion about gun control because there many more deaths by guns than by any other means, well until Oxycodon & Fentenal ( classed as epidemic!! ) By that measurement death by gun is also epidemic.
 
Hoid
#10551
Actually in America death by gun is a constitutional guarantee.

That's the problem
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#10552
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Actually in America death by gun is a constitutional guarantee.

That's the problem


One good thing about death by gun, it's fast and often painless!
 
spaminator
#10553
Girl accidentally slain as parents attend Christmas party
Associated Press
Published:
December 17, 2018
Updated:
December 17, 2018 2:19 PM EST
(Getty Images file photo)
FLORISSANT, Mo. — Authorities say a 12-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his 6-year-old sister in suburban St. Louis while their parents were attending a Christmas party.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that police say Maliyah Palmer was shot in the head Friday night in Florissant after her brother found a 9 mm handgun in a dresser drawer in his parents’ bedroom. Maliyah died later at a hospital.
The children’s 16-year-old sister was watching her younger siblings at the time.
Police initially released a statement describing what happened as a “tragic accident” and said no charges would be filed. But on Monday, Chief Timothy Lowery said the statement was premature and that prosecutors would make the ultimate charging decision after the investigation is complete.
Lowery said the situation was “tragic and terrible.”
http://stltoday.com/news/local/crime...262396648.html
http://torontosun.com/news/crime/gir...hristmas-party
 
JamesBondo
#10554
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

What do you NOT understand about guns and death!! If you are dead by a gunshot, it does not matter if it was murder,suicide or accidental....you are dead. So forget about classifying only murder or homicide of any use in an discussion about gun control because there many more deaths by guns than by any other means, well until Oxycodon & Fentenal ( classed as epidemic!! ) By that measurement death by gun is also epidemic.

deatb by medical error is a mucb bigger problem. and I would think you are insane if you wanted to lump medical errors 5ogether witb the other deaths like disconnecting life support. Classification of death does matter. a medical errors leading to a heart attack is not the same as other heart attack incidents.
 
JamesBondo
#10555
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Actually in America death by gun is a constitutional guarantee.
That's the problem

Are you really that dumb?
 
JamesBondo
#10556
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

I'm not a fan of death cults like the NRA, if that's what you mean.

Yes, that is an example of your lack of logic and objectivity when you are discussing issues with an alberta duck hunter.
 
DaSleeper
+1
#10557
https://toronto.citynews.ca/2018/12/...nd-finch-area/



Is that area of Toronto trying to compete with the "Red Zone" in Detroit?


Take the legally owned guns away from honest citizens so that only criminals have guns!
It's the Liberal way....
Last edited by DaSleeper; Dec 18th, 2018 at 08:37 AM..
 
spilledthebeer
#10558
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

and now you are a coward that wont answer a question about yourself.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Poor Stupid Bondo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!


HE GETS HIS ANSWER AND IS TOO STUPID TO SEE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posts like mine are important so that LIE-berals - LIKE YOU- will know that their Fake News is only being accepted by civil service



union Hogs and select groups who are BEING PAID to like LIE-berals!


Now run along Bondo- go put on your tinfoil thinking cap and see if you can come up with a LIE-beral explanation for how our



"BOOMING ECONOMY" can also be so DEEPLY IN DEBT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
spilledthebeer
#10559
[QUOTE=JLM;2685699]
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

\


His biggest problems are lack of flexibility and versatility. Not EVERY Liberal is as he describes.






HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Not every LIE-beralis as I describe???????????????????????????????????



THAT IS REALLY FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Especially considering the utterly HYPOCRITICAL WAY LIE-berals condemn ALL OF CANADA as "systemic racists" simply because



we do not agree with LIE-BERALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !


LIE-beral thought process is so contorted and diseased they think we are Racists if we fuss about the national bankruptcy that LIE-


berals are driving us into!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-berals are so twisted they think it is RACIST to ask about the cost of accepting HORDES of illegals without making ANY EFFORT



to discover if any of them might be drug dealers or terrorists etc!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-beral lust for power is so poisonous that they do not care in the slightest if the illegals have any ability to succeed in CANADA!



It is enough for LIE-berals that the illegals be able to mark and X beside the name of a LIE-beral on a ballot box!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#10560
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

One good thing about death by gun, it's fast and often painless!

Well for many more years of good life to a day or so of pain at the end guess which most would choose. In Canada we can choose when to die if the pain becomes too much. I am certain so many that were cut down would have chosen not to be killed by gun at the time of someone else's choosing.