“Consensus” theory of evolution of the species falls apart

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

(Natural News) A surprising new study is casting serious doubt on the popular theory that modern animals are the result of millions of years of evolution. After looking at the mitochondrial DNA of thousands of animal species, including humans, researchers reached the stunning conclusion that nearly every species dates back just 100,000 to 200,000 years.
The study was carried out by the University of Basel ’s David S. Thaler and The Rockefeller University ’s Mark Young Stoeckle. According to the conventional narrative of evolution involving adaption based on genetic mutations and survival of the fittest, one would expect older species and those with big populations spread across the planet to have greater genetic variation. However, the researchers actually found that 90 percent of the animal species have mitochondrial DNA variation that is similarly low.

Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy

Reality as we know it is a colossal lie. Rockefeller is one of the major investors in perpetrating that lie. Evolution does not happen on the physical plane. We are now in a state of devolution as witnessed by the right wing evangelical movement that inflates Trump's ego.

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

(Natural News) A surprising new study is casting serious doubt on the popular theory that modern animals are the result of millions of years of evolution. After looking at the mitochondrial DNA of thousands of animal species, including humans, researchers reached the stunning conclusion that nearly every species dates back just 100,000 to 200,000 years.
The study was carried out by the University of Basel ’s David S. Thaler and The Rockefeller University ’s Mark Young Stoeckle. According to the conventional narrative of evolution involving adaption based on genetic mutations and survival of the fittest, one would expect older species and those with big populations spread across the planet to have greater genetic variation. However, the researchers actually found that 90 percent of the animal species have mitochondrial DNA variation that is similarly low.

Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn

Sure like to know what ecological catastrophy occurred between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago to drive the appearance of do many new species. It may have also required something like exceptionally vigorous solar activity to irradiate the planet and generate a wide range of mutations, some of which would have ended up as viable species.

A massive nuclear war could have done that, too.

Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister

I don't see anything in that study to contradict evolution. All the study says is that evolution occurred more rapidly than previously thought. Of course, it will be subjected to peer review just as all new theories are and it is entirely possible that flaws maybe found in the study. And in any case it definitely does not support creationism.

Quote: Originally Posted by petros

Malarkey!

Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn

Sure like to know what ecological catastrophy occurred between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago to drive the appearance of do many new species. It may have also required something like exceptionally vigorous solar activity to irradiate the planet and generate a wide range of mutations, some of which would have ended up as viable species.

A massive nuclear war could have done that, too.

Quote: Originally Posted by Bar Sinister

I don't see anything in that study to contradict evolution. All the study says is that evolution occurred more rapidly than previously thought. Of course, it will be subjected to peer review just as all new theories are and it is entirely possible that flaws maybe found in the study. And in any case it definitely does not support creationism.

Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid

So does this study speculate that the species that appeared 100- 200,000 years ago simply appeared fully formed and had no antecedents?

That seems rather difficult to believe.

Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light

New species still appear every now and then, in many areas .. in many countries; this observation is denied by many rigid minded, but worth to be studied and investigated.

The Way in Which Some Animals and Man Were Created
http://www.quran-ayat.com/retort/ind...h_My_Own_Eyes_
quran-ayat.com/retort/index.htm#I_Saw_with_My_Own_Eyes_

One of my friends said he too saw some of such creation-place near a river .. in a place where a dog had dug a place for it in a hill of sand or soil near a river.

He said his older brother told him: Yes, it is here created.
His mother also affirmed this: Yes, my son; such mice or rats are created near the river. [i.e. they are familiar with such observations]

A farmer from Samarra in Iraq said he also had seen a similar observation.

In addition, every now and then we hear about the appearance of some weird animal in a region where it is not familiar .. like the snakes or others

A kind of blue or grey poisonous snakes appeared in a region (of idolaters: those enthusiastic about the imams) and started to bite them causing the death of some of them; and inserting great fear among them, like this kind of snakes:

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

Well there is the old "let there be light", which certainly did occur. You and I both being creations certainly must have been created. What could have been mutated if the mitocondrial DNA has that 200,000 suggested year of origin? Could Noah and cargo have been from some other planet? Keep in mind my previous post about the technicle perfection of stone blocks of 1400 tons and more at Balbek for instance.







You can,t accept any novelty can you? Of course you know what that means. How many millions of times faster do you think evolution occured. If only you could become educated about the mistaken idea of settled science. Perhaps your evolution has ceased.

Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light

The atheist or disbeliever chooses to believe in the 'natural selection' while he did not see it for certain and in reality; only he desires to cling to such theories and explanations... and he speaks loudly as if it is a fact and as if he saw it with his eyes.. and even he challenges others to deny it.

While the believer or what is called the 'creationist' sees all God's marvels and he believes and his belief increases in spite of the denial of atheists .. so this is the testing or checking or examining of either the faith or disbelief.

The atheist does not see and he in spite of this accepts such concepts .. and the believer sees the marvels and he believes.

Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light

It is neither dumb nor crap; the "scientific" is not restricted to your atheism or your crap.

Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy

It is almost time for you to threaten to kill someone so you can get banned and then come back in a little while as someone else, isn't it eanassir?

Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light

Where were you hiding monkey-face?
Don't you fear one may box you and shutter your ugly teeth?

Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light

It is neither dumb nor crap; the "scientific" is not restricted to your atheism or your assertions.

Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn

Sure like to know what ecological catastrophy occurred between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago to drive the appearance of do many new species. It may have also required something like exceptionally vigorous solar activity to irradiate the planet and generate a wide range of mutations, some of which would have ended up as viable species.

A massive nuclear war could have done that, too.

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

(Natural News) A surprising new study is casting serious doubt on the popular theory that modern animals are the result of millions of years of evolution. After looking at the mitochondrial DNA of thousands of animal species, including humans, researchers reached the stunning conclusion that nearly every species dates back just 100,000 to 200,000 years.
The study was carried out by the University of Basel ’s David S. Thaler and The Rockefeller University ’s Mark Young Stoeckle. According to the conventional narrative of evolution involving adaption based on genetic mutations and survival of the fittest, one would expect older species and those with big populations spread across the planet to have greater genetic variation. However, the researchers actually found that 90 percent of the animal species have mitochondrial DNA variation that is similarly low.