Sex with teen boys wouldn’t have been a crime if she wasn’t their teacher, cops say


spaminator
#1
Sex with teen boys wouldn’t have been a crime if she wasn’t their teacher, cops say
Postmedia Network
First posted: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 01:58 PM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 02:12 PM EDT
A Georgia teacher is in hot water after allegedly having sex several times with two male students.
Laura Rich, 38, who worked as a substitute teacher at an alternative school, the Ace Academy in Canton, Ga., between January 2015 and August of this year, was charged Friday with several counts of sexual assault by a teacher, news channel WSB-TV reports .
It is alleged that on several occasions, Rich invited the boys - a 16-year-old and 18-year-old - to her suburban home in Acworth for sex in 2015.
And although the two students were legally of age at the time in Georgia, her occupation made it illegal.
“It’s the relationship she had as teacher-student that made it a crime,” Cherokee County sheriff’s office Lt. Jay Baker said.
The school released a statement saying that it has severed all ties with the teacher.
“She no longer is permitted to work as a substitute teacher in CCSD. Our school district has zero tolerance for inappropriate relationships between students and any adults serving in any capacity in our schools,” the Cherokee County School District said.
Laura Rich is pictured in this YouTube screen grab.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=boYCWiu3vVM
Sex with teen boys wouldn’t have been a crime if she wasn’t their teacher, cops
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1 / -1
#2  Top Rated Post
We need to deport all the white Christians if their community won't condemn these actions.
 
Danbones
#3
The US has large ex pat communities in most of the countries it has invaded
and as luck would have it those places are now largely empty of the original people who lived there
send then there

...of course if you are a page...you are sh!t out of luck
you'll have to shelter in place
 
davesmom
#4
What's the age of consent? 12, 14, ? Whatever it is, wouldn't it apply to both sexes?
A woman who has sex with teenage boys is more like an animal in heat than a woman. 'Cock-a-doodle=doo; Any cock'll do'.
 
Danbones
#5
Especially one has to wonder about people who aren't smart enough to take their peccadillos way away from the nest...
or Job that pays for the nest;
should people that dumb be teaching children?
 
Tecumsehsbones
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

What's the age of consent? 12, 14, ? Whatever it is, wouldn't it apply to both sexes?

Sixteen in Georgia.

Did you read the article? It said the sex would have been legal but for her position.

Quote:

A woman who has sex with teenage boys is more like an animal in heat than a woman. 'Cock-a-doodle=doo; Any cock'll do'.

All us former teenage boys're eternally grateful. But don't let that stop you from judging now, hear?
 
Ludlow
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

What's the age of consent? 12, 14, ? Whatever it is, wouldn't it apply to both sexes?
A woman who has sex with teenage boys is more like an animal in heat than a woman. 'Cock-a-doodle=doo; Any cock'll do'.

It's a two cock fallacy
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#8
Assume same would be true if teens were 16 year old girls?
 
Danbones
#9
Quote:

the sex would have been legal but for her position.

lol
should have stuck to the missionary position
possibly in a heathen country where there are less mores
 
MHz
#10
Anybody do a followup to see how they made out later in life compared to the boys that were repeatedly raped by Priests and other figures of authority?? I'm thinking all smile a bit more for no real apparent reason.

Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

lol
should have stuck to the missionary position
possibly in a heathen country where there are less mores

Disclaimer: This is a joke and it was told to me as a joke, a laugh and/or a frown is a suitable reply.

The Sheriff comes across the School teacher tied to a tree and she had obviously been violated. She sees the badge and starts to tank him for arriving as the 12 men who passed by earlier just took advantage of her and kept going. The first words the Sheriff says is, "Well Mame I can see this just isn't your day.' as he reaches for his belt to his trousers. (enter emotion here)
 
Danbones
#11
lol, I remember that movie
we used to skip school to go to the movies
nuns you know?...no funnie there.

I do have a buddy though, now a postie, who married our grade 4 french teacher 14 years later
she was a part timer and naught a nun
 
Ludlow
#12
She does have pretty eyes.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiing View Post

Assume same would be true if teens were 16 year old girls?

There is no differentiation by sex in Georgia's age of consent law.

Quote: Originally Posted by Ludlow View Post

She does have pretty eyes.

Actually, she looks amazing for a mugshot. Probably cleans up real nice.
 
Remington1
+1
#14
The issue is that parents can't watch their kids all the time, so you trust they are not being preyed upon in school by their teacher. My boys always found a way to be with girls. I got a call once from a teacher saying one of my boy had been caught kissing a girl in a closet at the school! Well, they liked each other, but they were both grade 6, man oh man!! Anyway, they are great friends today. I'm sure both boys and girls find ways to experiment, whether at parties or hanging out, and that is okay with me, as long as they don't go to far and get into trouble. Having sex with a 15 + year older teacher is an issue for me though. NO NO NO, that is crossing the line. These boys should have learned the art of sex with someone in their age group; someone with the same level of experience and mentality as them. Later on, when they are older, they can experiment with whomever they want.
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by Remington1 View Post

The issue is that parents can't watch their kids all the time, so you trust they are not being preyed upon in school by their teacher.

I'd say it's more of an issue of consent. Hard to say no to an authority figure.
 
davesmom
+1
#16
I don't see it as a matter of religion or even law, for that matter. It's a matter of morals.
There's something off-kilter about an adult who can't resist sex with a child.
If a person uses sex merely as a personal gratification and doesn't acknowledge and deeper meaning or a responsibility, that person has an emotional maturity lack.
 
lone wolf
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

What's the age of consent? 12, 14, ? Whatever it is, wouldn't it apply to both sexes?
A woman who has sex with teenage boys is more like an animal in heat than a woman. 'Cock-a-doodle=doo; Any cock'll do'.

Yet you support a guy who has openly spoke of how he'd be dating his daughter and groped her butt in front of millions on TV
 
PoliticalNick
#18
What can I say? Wish I had a had a hot teacher who put out in high school. There was a couple whom the guys would fantasize about but none that were...ummm..willing to indulge.

I did have a quick fling with one of the secretaries a few years later (she was only 5 years older) but never did get a teacher. I also had a 28 year old girlfriend when I was 18 which was fantastic til her kid called me 'daddy'...and gone!

My guess, having been a teenage boy, is that these kids were more than willing and do not feel at all used or abused but in fact feel like lucky stars. She appears to be reasonably good looking and I imagine they have a few new tricks for the girls at school to learn.

I could understand if they were 12 or 14 but at 18 there should not be an issue if both are consenting.

Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post

Yet you support a guy who has openly spoke of how he'd be dating his daughter and groped her butt in front of millions on TV

I would grope her butt too! Maybe even date her for a weekend
 
lone wolf
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNick View Post


I would grope her butt too! Maybe even date her for a weekend

The difference being, she's not your daughter
 
Machjo
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

I'd say it's more of an issue of consent. Hard to say no to an authority figure.

Agreed. Age has nothing to do with it here since they were both the age of consent.
 
davesmom
+1
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post

Yet you support a guy who has openly spoke of how he'd be dating his daughter and groped her butt in front of millions on TV



You forgot to finish - he said he'd date her IF SHE WASN'T HIS DAUGHTER. I never saw him grope anybody's butt and I don't think his daughter(s) would have allowed such a thing.
I won't be supporting anybody. I don't get a vote.
 
lone wolf
#22
I didn't forget to finish. Who (other than the easily led and incapable of thinking) believes anything Trump says doesn't have another meaning - or is even worth respectfully quoting. Never saw the grope? How not? It's all over Youtube. Help yourself.... You don't have to be ignorant unless you want to be (as you've proven so well)

Last I heard, Bill wasn't running so Trump is offering the best he's got: Cheap shots. Answer me this: Why is it okay to overlook a possible President's blatant disregard for morals if he's hiding behind your favourite colours?
 
davesmom
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post

I didn't forget to finish. Who (other than the easily led and incapable of thinking) believes anything Trump says doesn't have another meaning - or is even worth respectfully quoting. Never saw the grope? How not? It's all over Youtube. Help yourself.... You don't have to be ignorant unless you want to be (as you've proven so well)

Last I heard, Bill wasn't running so Trump is offering the best he's got: Cheap shots. Answer me this: Why is it okay to overlook a possible President's blatant disregard for morals if he's hiding behind your favourite colours?


You see, hear and believe whatever you like and I will do the same.
I don't insult you for what you see, hear, believe or think. I respect your right to do that. I guess you don't offer the same latitude to those who disagree with you.
Sad!
And I don't surf Youtube eiher; too many other, better things to do than dwell on what a bunch of people with no other life fight about.
 
lone wolf
#24
Wa-aa-ah Poor you! Adjust your talking-down-to attitude and you won't have it returned tenfold. Stay out of places where thin skin is hard on your fragile ego otherwise.

Gonna blame your mike now?
 
PoliticalNick
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post

Why is it okay to overlook a possible President's blatant disregard for morals if he's hiding behind your favourite colours?

Are you talking about Donald or Shillary....or any other president in the last 40 years. I wouldn't say anyone since Ike was of 'high moral character'.

Personally given the present choices I'll take Trump. At least he isn't totally controlled by the military-industrial complex and banking cartels.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNick View Post

Are you talking about Donald or Shillary....or any other president in the last 40 years. I wouldn't say anyone since Ike was of 'high moral character'.

Carter. Bush Sr.
 
lone wolf
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNick View Post

Are you talking about Donald or Shillary....or any other president in the last 40 years. I wouldn't say anyone since Ike was of 'high moral character'.

Personally given the present choices I'll take Trump. At least he isn't totally controlled by the military-industrial complex and banking cartels.

Excuse me.... Where do you read the words "high moral character"? Trolls and gossipy old ladies like to add their shyte to the mix so they can steer the conversation to something they know ... like their cats
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#28
Hey! You leave Snuggles out of this!
 
PoliticalNick
+1
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post

Excuse me.... Where do you read the words "high moral character"? Trolls and gossipy old ladies like to add their shyte to the mix so they can steer the conversation to something they know ... like their cats

Your comment basically proposed that Shillary had better moral character than Donald. I dispute that. She is a lawyer and career politician, that pretty much exempts her from having any morals at all.
 
lone wolf
#30
My comment, basically, said she'll overlook a daughter-groper's faults because he's her type of people but she'll condemn someone because her husband - who isn't even running - got a blow job in office from an entirely unrelated intern.
 

Similar Threads

0
5
Teacher accused of luring 5 boys
by sanctus | Dec 19th, 2006