Mueller report is in..


Tecumsehsbones
#421
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Why would they be dismissed by me? What did they prove outside of talking points?

They proved what was done by Trump to obstruct the investigation.

I know, you don't understand. It's OK, it's not like you have any interest.
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#422
Where is the indictments sealed or unsealed? Is there enough to proceed into impeachment? Is it more than enough to be blamed on a rookie non politician with a rookie team giving him bad advice? I know it said not enough evidence to indict and to much to exonerate, let's see how congress makes out with it.
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
+1 / -1
#423
Quote:

They proved what was done by Trump to obstruct the investigation.

indeed.

an aside: "Trumpsuckers".......that is good. As Trump has conned a lot of folks.
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#424
OK OB where are the indictments sealed or unsealed on Trump's obstruction charges?
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
-1
#425
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Where is the indictments sealed or unsealed? Is there enough to proceed into impeachment? Is it more than enough to be blamed on a rookie non politician with a rookie team giving him bad advice? I know it said not enough evidence to indict and to much to exonerate, let's see how congress makes out with it.

You mean are there any more iductments beyond the 34 generated by the Meuller probe so far?

http://time.com/5556331/mueller-inve...-guilty-pleas/

Don't forget that several items were spun off to the state of New York where Trump in not protected from prosecution by the Constitution.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#426
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Where is the indictments sealed or unsealed? Is there enough to proceed into impeachment? Is it more than enough to be blamed on a rookie non politician with a rookie team giving him bad advice? I know it said not enough evidence to indict and to much to exonerate, let's see how congress makes out with it.

It's been Justice Department policy, from which Mueller was not permitted to deviate, that the President cannot be indicted, since 1990.

You are an ignoramus, aren't you? Fortunately (for you), it doesn't detract from your conviction that you have the first clue what's going on here.
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#427
But it can be sealed until he comes out of office right?
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#428
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

You mean are there any more iductments beyond the 34 generated by the Meuller probe so far?
http://time.com/5556331/mueller-inve...-guilty-pleas/
Don't forget that several items were spun off to the state of New York where Trump in not protected from prosecution by the Constitution.

Had nothing to do with Trump-Russia collusion or Trump obstruction did they?
 
Tecumsehsbones
#429
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

But it can be sealed until he comes out of office right?

What part of "cannot be indicted" is beyond your comprehension?
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#430
Quote:

It's been Justice Department policy, from which Mueller was not permitted to deviate, that the President cannot be indicted, since 1990.

Why was this established to begin with??
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#431
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinio...ing-ncna956841


Quote:

So, a decision by the government to indict a sitting president under seal coupled with a failure to do anything about it — to initiate trial proceedings or to litigate the question of whether a sitting president can be charged with a crime — could run into Sixth Amendment headwinds. It is not clear that the government would lose under these circumstances, but it could.
By the way, you might be familiar with some of the Department of Justice lawyers involved in the Doggett case when it was argued in the Supreme Court. The solicitor general on the Doggett brief filed in the Supreme Court was a gentleman by the name of Ken Starr. And the high-ranking assistant attorney general who argued the case the first time in the Supreme Court in 1991 (before it was reargued in 1992) was a gentleman by the name of Bob Mueller

So they technically need to impeach him first, so is there enough to impeach him T-bones?
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
+1
#432
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinio...ing-ncna956841
So they technically need to impeach him first, so is there enough to impeach him T-bones?

How about Perjury.? He's never told the truth about anything in his entire life.
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#433
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

How about Perjury.? He's never told the truth about anything in his entire life.

Oh was that under oath?
 
Walter
#434
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

How about Perjury.? He's never told the truth about anything in his entire life.

Funny. Kaboom.
 
pgs
Free Thinker
+1
#435
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

How 'bout it, coward? Where was Obama born?

You tell me , I donít know or care .
 
pgs
Free Thinker
+1
#436
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

We'll see how much of a ground swell there is for impeachment.

I think ultimately that Barr has done a disservice to his boss on this one. As Warren and OAC and the rest of the progs dig deeper into the report they will no doubt want to go after President Pee Pee Tape.

Warren is already trying to drum up support and I don't think she will have a lot of trouble doing so.

Do you have a copy of this peepee tape you continue to talk about ?
 
pgs
Free Thinker
+1
#437
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post


Trump seethes, blames ex-White House counsel after Mueller report relies on notes from White House aides


A day after the special counsel��s report offered a portrayal of President Trump��s protracted campaign to thwart the Russia investigation, Trump directed much of his ire at former White House counsel Donald McGahn, whose ubiquity in the report��s footnotes laid bare his extensive cooperation in chronicling the president��s actions.

Some of the report��s most derogatory scenes were attributed not only to the recollections of McGahn and other witnesses, but also to the contemporaneous notes kept by several senior administration officials �� the kind of paper trail that Trump has long sought to avoid leaving.


the bloke is angry and explosive...... NEVER taking responsibility for anything......... NOT fit for the job. Don't think he is fit for any job....He simply cannot work WITH others. He has to rule them and then discard them if they don't comply to his pathological whims and wishes. his disciples seem to like that. They certainly overlook his pathological lying.as if it is the "new normal"

Drain the swamp .
 
Tecumsehsbones
#438
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

You tell me , I donít know or care .

I can see how when I said "coward," you thought I was talking to you, but I really wasn't.

So f*ck off, y'know?
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#439
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Drain the swamp .

Trump's brainwashing tactics are rather successful with some. Regurgitating Trump slogans is not independent thinking.
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#440
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post

Trump's brainwashing tactics are rather successful with some. Regurgitating Trump slogans is not independent thinking.

So, pretty much what you'd expect from somebody who isn't independent and doesn't think, is it not?
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#441
Trump hurt by Mueller report as voters side with press coverage

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/tru..._notifications
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#442
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Do you have a copy of this peepee tape you continue to talk about ?

"Copy of a tape" ...

Are you stuck in some kind of time vortex, pigs?
 
Hoid
#443
 
Walter
#444
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post

Trump hurt by Mueller report as voters side with press coverage
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/tru..._notifications

Rawstory is a radical alt-left site.
 
Walter
#445
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

"Copy of a tape" ...
Are you stuck in some kind of time vortex, pigs?

Do you have a copy of the video?
 
Hoid
+1
#446
Racist on full time Mueller Report damage control.
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#447
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

Do you have a copy of the video?

Maybe, some Assange-like hacker will access it some day ... if there are any hackers out there who DO NOT work for the Russians or their friends, like Assange does.

It will not be in the form of a "tape" any more than trains go "choo-choo" in the 21st century.
 
Walter
#448
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Maybe, some Assange-like hacker will access it some day ... if there are any hackers out there who DO NOT work for the Russians or their friends, like Assange does.
It will not be in the form of a "tape" any more than trains go "choo-choo" in the 21st century.

Only Ruskies can be hackers.
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#449
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

Only Ruskies can be hackers.

Probably true.

Maybe, Trump could get them to swing it but he won't, of course.
 

Similar Threads

163
Just Now: Mueller subpoenas Trump :)
by mentalfloss | 3 weeks ago
84
When will Mueller be fired?
by avro25 | Jan 12th, 2019
99
Mueller Has Questions for Trump
by Ocean Breeze | Jan 11th, 2019