The army

Christian
#31
 
Christian
#32
Of the actual meaning of military divided into the United States.

The introduction would be better if the sum of the professional soldiers dropped by soldiers because it would be the excellence of Trump taking this seriously.

Because I'm not happy with today's occupational army but it keeps top levels but not the best amount of US I think might have been because I would prefer to go down the rankings of a large number of professional soldiers down the rankings because then I would keep the United States in war with an active amount of less than half a million is the sum I thought but in the honesty name I thought of a good sum but not strongly regarded the perseverance of what I wanted to present to the people here in the forefront.

But the remaining Washington leader would present the sum that I wanted with America.

But the fact was ready for this to end because I think about the sum of 43,000 of marine corps in Texas only got found out so thought.

But also thought the air force would be zero exist so it would not be included America's military later, the Coast Guard and the Navy went together to form 27,000 sailors since it was better if the Army gave it all at home at 230,000 and no Army troops abroad. Now I came to the sum of 300,000 professional soldiers who are good enough.
Last edited by Christian; Nov 15th, 2018 at 08:15 PM..
 
Curious Cdn
#33
It's a rabble.
 
Christian
#34
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

It's a rabble.

Fair for my best seat of America, of course, a refurbishment of gold values.

If I were president of the United States of course.

Trump would do the same.
 
Christian
#35
U.S. Army would lose weight, so they will be more Germany of the whole thing worse, but I'm wearing U.S. army if they go down but keep 900 nuclear weapons since 500 of the backup would go thinking my U.S. Army my imaginary hollowed off from abroad.

Come with the idea last day that only Trump could get rid of.

The United States is a major Germany but two would feel good of descending.
 
Christian
#36
500 big bombs then 400 of reserve.
 
MHz
-1
#37
NATO should use fear and good judgment when thinking of taking on Russia.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ict-4jJEnjo
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#38
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

NATO should use fear and good judgment when thinking of taking on Russia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ict-4jJEnjo

Throw Poland to them, like a bone.

That'll stop them. Besides, the Poles are used to it.
 
MHz
#39
That might work in a game of checkers.
 
Christian
#40
Asian has now a same Army.
 
Christian
#41
An EU within 19 countries is mine best the EU first for leave are the U.K. then Greece, Austria, Romania, Czech Republic, Malta, Cyprus, Lithuania, Latvia the EU must clear up.
 
MHz
#42
AKA: Rothschild Armed Forces
 
MHz
#43
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C7yCwA1GRs
Seriously???
 
Bone357
#44
Best military of mine likely is:

Russia - expectation is war in Ukraine.

Or

The US - downhill by forces.

Or

Germany - big power across the EU.
Last edited by Bone357; Nov 30th, 2018 at 06:46 PM..
 
Curious Cdn
#45
Or China

Hot, spicy, sweet and sour, takeaway army.
 
MHz
#46
Really?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGD9P8LyKyE
 
Curious Cdn
#47
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

Really?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGD9P8LyKyE


Play along with the PLA!

http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/...test-victories
 
TalkingTogheter
#48
The biggest troops across Europa:

1. RUSSIA

900,000 men.

554,000 paramilitary.

2. UKRAINE

204,000 men.

88,000 paramilitary.

3. FRANCE

202,700 men.

103,400 paramilitary.

4. GERMANY

178,600 men.

600 paramilitary.

5. ITALY

174,500 men.

182,350 paramilitary.
 
MHz
#49
How about a complete list for NATO forces?
 
TalkingTogheter
#50
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

How about a complete list for NATO forces?

Up to you and fix the NATO troops but I am very displeased about the whole device when we live around Europa's peace.

Germany had a new woman as leader.

France had a male.

Sweden had before re-election in 2019 the Lövin.

Poland had anarcho-communism.
 
Christian
#51
50 percent ready about the GFP new list the world a new best list in the rankings of the crowd and economy and the number of troops of different kinds then the number of arms in different branches of defense. Viewed from 2009 to 2018, the US is one in all lists.

For me, the will may be the United States outside one place.

Thought North Korea is the strongest or to become Taiwan or Iraq or something of the same minor ranking then before in the top ten maximum two new top ten.
 
Christian
#52
 
Christian
#53
 
Blackleaf
-1
#54
Quote: Originally Posted by TalkingTogheter View Post

The biggest troops across Europa:
1. RUSSIA
900,000 men.
554,000 paramilitary.
2. UKRAINE
204,000 men.
88,000 paramilitary.
3. FRANCE
202,700 men.
103,400 paramilitary.
4. [FIND the="Arial Black"]GERMANY[/FONT]
178,600 men.
600 paramilitary.
5. ITALY
174,500 men.
182,350 paramilitary.

The German Army is tiny - a mere 62,000.

The primary school I live next to could defeat it in battle.
Last edited by Blackleaf; 2 weeks ago at 05:46 PM..
 
Christian
#55
Quote: Originally Posted by Blackleaf View Post

The German Army is tiny - a mere 62,000.

83,500 is a fact.
 
MHz
#56
 
Blackleaf
-1
#57
Quote: Originally Posted by Christian View Post

83,500 is a fact.

I'm right. Check Wikipedia.

German Army: 62,000.

British Army: 109,000. And we're smaller than Germany (but won't be within 20 years due to Britain's rapidly growing population and Germany's rapidly shrinking one) and are an island nation.
Last edited by Blackleaf; 2 weeks ago at 06:29 PM..
 
Blackleaf
#58
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

Sheer numbers is a crap way to measure military power.

For example, Britain can send any number of her tanks to anywhere on the planet within 24 hours. Germany can't. In fact, only the USA, Britain and France have such power projection capabilities.
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#59
Quote: Originally Posted by Blackleaf View Post

Sheer numbers is a crap way to measure military power.
For example, Britain can send any number of her tanks to anywhere on the planet within 24 hours. Germany can't. In fact, only the USA, Britain and France have such power projection capabilities.

The British Armed Forces are broke and broken.

So are Canada's.
 
Blackleaf
#60
The British Army has 331 Challenger 2 tanks, 654 CVR(T) armoured fighting vehicles, 769 Warrior armoured fighting vehicles, 895 Bulldog armoured fighting vehicles, around 700 Mastiff, Ridgeback and Wolfhound mobility vehicles, 508 Jackal and Coyote mobility vehicles, 399 Foxhound mobility vehicles, 311 Husky mobility vehicles, 371 Land Rovers, 364 Snatch Land Rovers, 401 Panther vehicles and 11 TPz Fuchs.
 

Similar Threads

0
Dad's Army
by Blackleaf | Dec 24th, 2006
5
Army OCT 1ST
by EastSideScotian | Sep 22nd, 2006
7
Our army!
by Proud_Quebecer | Jun 10th, 2004