Rebranding The Carbon Tax As A "Price On Pollution".


petros
+2
#1
Remember when the Prime Minister said this a couple of weeks ago? "We don't want pollution, so we're putting a price on it."

The PM was talking about his government steaming ahead to impose an unwanted, unnecessary, and ineffective carbon tax on Canadian jobs, businesses, and families.

But CBC News reported this unbelievable story from Quebec:


Quote:

The City of Longueuil has been given the green light to dump more than 160 million litres of raw sewage into the St. Lawrence River in mid-November.

The sewage dump will run for eight days, from Nov. 15 to Nov. 22, so Longueuil can repair a cracked pipe that runs under the St. Lawrence between Île-Charron​ and Old Longueuil.

Do you think the carbon tax will be added to the 160 million litres of raw sewage that was just dumped into the St. Lawrence River? No. Way.
That can't be good for the environment.
 
taxslave
+5
#2  Top Rated Post
It would if that was a town in Alberta for even thir shit has hydrocarbons in it.
 
Danbones
+1
#3
So the newfs will finally be getting some federal...aids...yay!
 
Dixie Cup
+4
#4
They keep changing the definition as people wise up to what they're actually doing - screwing us!! Still trying to make us feel guilty for being successful and also for lowering emissions with technology. They are absolutely determined to tax us to death! REALLY must be something in it for them to be so determined to push their ideology through. Wonder whose pockets are being lined?? And you're right, sewage apparently isn't pollution!! Who knew??
 
MHz
#5
So taxes are the problem rather than the bombs dropping on people in certain locations. I was about to go down a different path, thanx.
 
Twin_Moose
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by Dixie Cup View Post

They keep changing the definition as people wise up to what they're actually doing - screwing us!! Still trying to make us feel guilty for being successful and also for lowering emissions with technology. They are absolutely determined to tax us to death! REALLY must be something in it for them to be so determined to push their ideology through. Wonder whose pockets are being lined?? And you're right, sewage apparently isn't pollution!! Who knew??

It's a way to support their UN pledge to support 3rd world countries without taking the funds out of the budget where taxpayers would reject it. It looks better dressed up as a Carbon credit than a donation IMO
 
MHz
#7
Really? There really is no shame in the collective is there? Your lies stick out plain as day to everybody but the collective. It appears to be case of insanity that the insane are oblivious to. Not a huge surprise.

The carbon tax money goes to the World Bank and the 3rd world will have to cough up money they don't have before they are allowed any electrical devices.
 
Retired_Can_Soldier
+2
#8
Justin Service Tax.
 
MHz
#9
Whatt?? Global tax, you do know that part right??
 
Jinentonix
+1
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

Remember when the Prime Minister said this a couple of weeks ago? "We don't want pollution, so we're putting a price on it."

We don't want Trudeau. We'd put a price on his head but don't know if it's worth paying more to kill a piece of shit than the piece of shit is actually worth.
 
MHz
#11
That post says a lot more about your mental state (or lack of) than it does about JT. Is the 'we' because you are too gutless to use a singular term for yourself??
 
Jinentonix
+2
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

That post says a lot more about your mental state (or lack of) than it does about JT. Is the 'we' because you are too gutless to use a singular term for yourself??

Read Trudeau's quote, dumbass. And to be brutally honest, some anti-Semitic, conspiracy theory spewing mental case is the last person who should be judging anyone's mental state.
 
MHz
#13
Typical Jewish collective bullshit, if you don't like somebody, . . exterminate them. You call for the PM to be killed as your solution yet I'm the mentally unbalanced one.
Things not going very good for you fukers anyplace, let alone here.
 
Jinentonix
+3
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

Typical Jewish collective bullshit, if you don't like somebody, . . exterminate them.

What, you mean like your little muslim buddies have been trying to do to Israel since 1947? F*ck off with your anti-Semitic conspiracy crap.
Yep, you cheer the deaths of innocents when they're Israelis and yet you get all worked up over mere words about Turdy. Talk about a f*cked up mental state.
 
Hoid
#15
in 1947 the only jews left were ones the christians hadn't massacred.
 
petros
+1
#16
You never knew about the Muzzie Nazis?

Why am I not surprised?
 
MHz
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

You never knew about the Muzzie Nazis?

Why am I not surprised?

Lol More of you collective fukers imploding 'collectively' is like Christmas coming early.

Miko Peled is Jewish and the son of a General that was there through it all. I tend to be able to spot honest people from the liars. He ias honest, any other version is something liars and their cohorts support. That makes all of the loco Jewish collective, totally fuking worthless on your best day.
History lesson starts at the 6:00 mark

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOaxAckFCuQ&t=8s
Miko Peled, the General's Son. Seattle. Oct. 1, 2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1DNRIa3aEc
"No Jews Are Israelite Descendants" - Miko Peled, Israeli General's Son
Miko Peled talks about Zionism as the problem, but is it just Zionism? Or is it the entire tribe and its Talmudic teachings the problem? After all the Talmud calls non-Jews 'Goyim' which means cattle.
 
MHz
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

in 1947 the only jews left were ones the christians hadn't massacred.

Link?
Us Christians are a bloodthirsty lot I will admit. You have a few flaws in your sermon. I thought you should know that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qlGVkHaeFc&t=3475s
How the Jewish Rothschild Zionists Created Modern Israel
 
MHz
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by Jinentonix View Post

What, you mean like your little muslim buddies have been trying to do to Israel since 1947? F*ck off with your anti-Semitic conspiracy crap.
Yep, you cheer the deaths of innocents when they're Israelis and yet you get all worked up over mere words about Turdy. Talk about a f*cked up mental state.

Hope your drooling fuks up your keyboard.

Your complaint about my willingness to talk to Muslims is noted. My talking to the Jewish collective is as long as my account here began. So far I find all of you guilty of being quick to condemn the flaws in others but absolutely refusing to admit the collective has any today let alone in the past 140 in which 100M Gentiles dies so the Jewish Rothschild Bankers could create Israel followed by 70 years of constant war for the area in which millions of Muslims have been killed or displaced.
You seem to have a flawed version of what a fuktard really looks and acts like.
Bring it on Bitch.

Your complaint about cheering on the deaths of Jews is noted and dismissed as your version of what the truth is and how the loco collective arrives at it. Anything that upholds Jews as morally superior and all Gentiles are, . . . cattle in that they are to be a possession rather than being equal.

The 12 Tribes are from Abraham's 2nd oldest son so Gentiles are your older brothers.

Do you think Russia would shed any tears over the Jewish version of Royalty was wiped out like they wiped out the Russian Royals. Say the top 10 layers of the World Bank owners, I would shed many tears, then I would have a big slice of chocolate cake.
Last edited by MHz; 4 weeks ago at 05:38 PM..
 
petros
+2
#20
Start another hate thread. You're off topic again.
 
MHz
#21
It was your fuktard Jewish collective buddy that was off topic, my reply was to that post. Tell him to start a thread dumbass.


On topic, the carbon tax was to fight global warming, fighting global cooling will be many times more expensive.

Why be on topic with you fuks anyway, it isn't like you answer any questions posed to your tiny brains.

The black death will will be in the vaccine thread. Be sure to troll it asap.
 
petros
+1
#22
And they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went
 
Twin_Moose
+1
#23
And they don't want to spend money on Federal Environmental cleanup

Saskatchewan sues Ottawa over uranium cleanup

Quote:

REGINA - The Saskatchewan government is suing Ottawa over what it says is a failure to live up to a deal to split the swelling costs of cleaning up an old uranium mine.
"I just don't see how they can say, 'You're stuck with it,'" Energy and Resources Minister Bronwyn Eyre said Wednesday. "I just don't think that's fair."
The dispute centres on the shuttered Gunnar mine in northern Saskatchewan. The mine was originally developed to feed nuclear programs in the United States and in other NATO allies, but hasn't operated since 1964.
Because of its ore's strategic importance, it has always been federally regulated — unique among Canadian natural resources. As well, Saskatchewan's statement of claim argues the mine would never have been developed if not for federal policies to mine and export uranium to Canada's allies.
When Gunnar closed, it left behind open-pit and underground mines, as well as a mill, other facilities and a company town that once housed up to 1,200 people. The mine produced 4.4 million tonnes of tailings and 2.7 million tonnes of waste rock, some of which have since drifted into nearby Lake Athabasca.
In 2006, Saskatchewan signed a cost-sharing deal with Ottawa promising to split the cleanup expenses evenly. The total cost at that time was estimated to be $25 million.
That cost is now thought to be about $280 million.
"I can only speculate that the scope of the project was not fully grasped," Eyre said.
The statement of claim — which has not been proven in court — says Saskatchewan has spent about $126 million on the project while Ottawa has provided about $1 million.
Talks with different federal governments have failed and the province is now forced to go to court before a legal deadline at the end of the month passes, said Eyre.
"We are confronting a statute of limitations. We feel we're left with no choice."
Eyre said Ottawa has been balking at the growing cost of the cleanup. But the remediation program was approved by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, the industry's regulator, which has said the Gunnar program is comparable to what's been done at other sites.
It's not fair to expect Saskatchewan — and the Indigenous people who live in the area — to accept cut-rate work, said Eyre.
"All the work we've done has been OK'd by the (commission). The feds have suggested that we could have pursued lower-cost options. We completely disagree with that."
Vanessa Adams, a spokeswoman for Natural Resources Canada, said the federal government considers Saskatchewan the site's owner and responsible for its cleanup.
"Consistent with the original agreement, we are committed to providing ($13 million in) funding for the remaining two phases after Saskatchewan obtains all the necessary approvals required to proceed with remediation," she said in an email.
A provincial spokesman said Ottawa is insisting on licences for the remediation work different from those already granted by the regulator.
Eyre said the dispute over growing costs dates back to at least 2010. She said the current government continues to move slowly — a letter to federal Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi written over the summer didn't get a response until October.
It's at odds with the Liberal public positions on both environmental and Indigenous issues, Eyre said.
"It does strike me as ironic that in this case you have such a direct impact on First Nations communities and the environment and we're being told to pursue a cheaper option."