Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver
On religious grounds I agree with you but on scientific grounds there may be sounder reason to abstain from the delightfully tasty very close relative of human/mixed origin.
The Hybrid Hypothesis
A new theory of human origins Human origins: The other parent
EUGENE M. MCCARTHY, PHD GENETICS
Rationally, Darwin's theory is not correct .. but because atheists like it, and they defend it with enthusiasm which in fact is not the scientific way of thinking.
No objective evidence to it; nothing but only postulation and imagination; why do you insist on it as if it is a revelation?
While for this hypothesis of hybrid .. it more alien and weird.
Nothing to prove it but only the wishful thinking.
A hint which may be correct
: the chromosomes may be nearer than other animals (and actually it is far and so far from human.)
This similarity may agree with the explanation that the swines may have been created from the bodies of some idolaters and disobedient people
whose disobedience exceeded the bound and provoked the wrath of God.
This is not related only to the disobedient Children of Israel in the time of Nabuchodonosor
, but to other religious sects like in India who give much respect to rats: so rats climb on them and on their heads and they are glad of this believing they are their ancestor incarnation: which may indicate that such rats might have been created from the corpses of the dead idolaters