Planet Earth: A Question Of Expansion


MHz
#1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Othb0xsvZb4
Planet Earth: A Question Of Expansion (1982)
 
darkbeaver
#2
There is no longer any question. Every body in the solar system must regulate its mass.
 
MHz
#3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gemXKDWQGzk
Expanding Earth. It Is So Obvious. A Trip Around The World.

I'm just collecting a few links at the moment.
 
DaSleeper
#4
That was such an intelligent youtube video that I quit watching after the third "You know" within the first minute and just before that "I don't know when it happened"


Now...If you base your assumptions on such stupid videos and web sites


You are even more of a FOOL than I originally thought.....
 
darkbeaver
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

That was such an intelligent youtube video that I quit watching after the third "You know" within the first minute and just before that "I don't know when it happened"


Now...If you base your assumptions on such stupid videos and web sites


You are even more of a FOOL than I originally thought.....


That you originally thought? hahahahahahahah
 
MHz
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

That was such an intelligent youtube video that I quit watching after the third "You know" within the first minute and just before that "I don't know when it happened"


Now...If you base your assumptions on such stupid videos and web sites


You are even more of a FOOL than I originally thought.....

Like you ever had an original thought. The science fiction forum is where Pete and Dex are 'discussing things' .
 
MHz
#7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4RyhONYe0w


Growing Planets Theory
 
MHz
#8
https://youtu.be/hhGclNuT8fo
Greenland Crater under the Hiawatha Glacier

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D5U...1097F4E958728D
Neal Adams - Science: 12 - The great Lakes
 
petros
#9
Yup growing. About 100 tons per day falls to earth as meteorites and dust.

A whopping 1100 dump trucks per year.
 
MHz
#10
I know how excited you are Dex but you will gave to wait for the diamond thread to be posted. Only about 10 more pages to go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0VbPE0TOtQ
NASA | Greenland's Ice Layers Mapped in 3D

 
MHz
#11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9frs3Od9V58
The Stretching Crust - Northern Europe
 
darkbeaver
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

That was such an intelligent youtube video that I quit watching after the third "You know" within the first minute and just before that "I don't know when it happened"
Now...If you base your assumptions on such stupid videos and web sites
You are even more of a FOOL than I originally thought.....


And yet I believe that you are the sort who eats-up a National Geogorphic docucrapentary and are impressed by Dawkins or Tyson or any number of others from the army of the MM media BigBang science sales peeple.You will not even leave a link to something you think more professional.
 
darkbeaver
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

Yup growing. About 100 tons per day falls to earth as meteorites and dust.

A whopping 1100 dump trucks per year.

One-hundred tons is just dust compared to the constant mass transfer between orbital bodies in this solar system. One hundred tons is nothing comparatively. This year has been a good year for observing that same expansion, you can watch it spewing out of volcanoes almost every day now, a hundred new tons a second. You,ve stripped off your trousers and we can see your Darwinism.


http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2016/06/13/20619/



Home picture of the day Journey to the Centre of the Earth
Journey to the Centre of the Earth

Peter Mungo Jupp----------longtime pro geologist liked lookin for diamonds, hangs with and interviews numerous othwer pro geoligist on a frequent basis. Hees Austrailyin.
Last edited by darkbeaver; 2 weeks ago at 05:27 PM..
 
darkbeaver
#14
While there is evolution of a sort.
 
darkbeaver
#15
Climate or Planetary Dynamics

Posted on January 1, 2019by Louis Hissink
A recent paper published in Nature Geoscience noted that the Earth’s tropical belt in the northern hemisphere moved northwards during the LIA.
From 1568 to 1634, the tropics expanded to the north, the team found. That time period coincides with severe droughts and other disruptions of human societies, including the collapse of the Ottoman empire in Turkey, the end of the Ming Dynasty in China and near abandonment of the Jamestown Colony in Virginia, said Alfaro Sánchez, currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (http://www.creaf.cat/)in Barcelona, Spain
In 1582 Europe changed the calendar system from the Julian to the Gregorian; Why?
Was there a change in earth dynamics, and tilt, or was the change due to other factors, and how could one tell which from what?
My money is on a change in orbital dynamics caused by some external agent, or forcing if one wished to be PC.
PS. The abstract follows:
 
darkbeaver
#16
Osiris, Jesus and Venus

Posted on December 30, 2018by Louis Hissink
Various authors have noted a close parallel between the Osiris, Vedic and Christian cults, where each portrays a mother and a child, among other religious imageries.
Which makes me wonder whether these different cults focussed on the same physical event, the birth of Venus and the destruction of human civilisation during the 1st millennium, where the baby represents the birth of some cosmic prodigy, here Venus.
This interpretation is somewhat uber-Heinsohnian in that it further compresses the historical record by having the Vedic, Osiris and Roman cultures as contemporaries, and destroyed globally by the same cosmic agent.
I make two daring assumptions, the first based on the known clustering of radiometric dates as described by Briden and Gass, 1974, that 3 catastrophes occurred historically associated with exogenous agents, by which electric plasma forcings generated 3 distinct clusters of radiogenic deposits. The second is that known history of our era starts from the most recent “event”, here the Little Ice Age, before which history has simply been fabricateded by brain-addled, thought muddled monks and priests of the ruling elites who only saw what they believed.
 
DaSleeper
#17
*****
Last edited by DaSleeper; 2 weeks ago at 04:00 PM..
 
DaSleeper
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

And yet I believe that you are the sort who eats-up a National Geogorphic docucrapentary and are impressed by Dawkins or Tyson or any number of others from the army of the MM media BigBang science sales peeple.You will not even leave a link to something you think more professional.

Only on an internet forum, can you watch a few youtube videos and overnight become an "expert" in whatever field you desire...
Man.....you guys take yourselves way too seriously.....
 
darkbeaver
+1
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Only on an internet forum, can you watch a few youtube videos and overnight become an "expert" in whatever field you desire...
Man.....you guys take yourselves way too seriously.....


While all you can do is troll. You add nothing to the discussion in every thread you infect. You do not enter into conversation . You,re stuff
is like the scribbling on a breakfast cereal box.
 
Torch light
+1
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Othb0xsvZb4
Planet Earth: A Question Of Expansion (1982)

There are some factors leading to the earth expansion, while other factors lead to its contraction.

The earth contraction:
Obviously, when it becomes colder and colder, it will contract .. leading to breaking of its surface; therefore, large fissures and rifts may then occur and may also lead to some mountainous ranges appearing: some parts of the earth surface will depress and other parts will elevate.

This is the cooling of the earth in general particularly its core as it cools by heat radiation and the eruption of volcanoes... it is not the Global Warmth which almost affects the earth surface, not the earth core.

Here is about the earth contraction:
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/n...aches_the_Sun_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Earth_Approaches_the_Sun_

The expansion of the earth, on the other hand, is due to the falling down on it of a large number of meteoritic rocks and large amounts of cosmic or celestial dust, which is a continuous process.

And this is about its expansion (specially in the past)

">> (and He made [mountains] that landed upon it); that which heavily landed upon the earth, are the mountains. This can be explained as follows:
That sun had been transformed into an earth after the cooling of its surface, then the meteorites started to fall down on it to become the mountains. Therefore, most of the mountains on the earth surface were originally meteorites.

>> (and blessed it) means: He increased its size, and that was by many factors :

First: The crust of the earth started gradually to be colder more and more; so this increased its thickness.

Second: The falling down of meteorites upon it increased its mass and volume.

Third: The falling down of minute particles upon it (these are the fine particles that we see in a beam of sun rays entering a dark room through a window.) The origin of these particles is from the meteorites which were broken up after their Doomsday, so that their parts scattered in the space.

Fourth: The metals increased its volume and size by combination with other elements, e.g. the oxygen may combine with iron, so it will increase its volume, and ferric oxide will result; and carbon dioxide combines with calcium forming calcium carbonate; and nitrogen combines with sodium and potassium resulting in sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate; and so on gases combine with most of the metals to increase their volume, and by this way the Earth size goes on increasing with the passing of time and years."

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/i...n_of_the_Earth
quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm#Formation_of_the_Earth
Last edited by Torch light; 2 weeks ago at 10:57 AM..
 
MHz
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

Yup growing. About 100 tons per day falls to earth as meteorites and dust.

A whopping 1100 dump trucks per year.

See, you can be on topic and only 2 parts show you are a condescending prick at heart so there is hope for you after all, . . . cough.


I could ask where you came up with the numbers but I'm sure being the through scientist you aren't you took the weight of the earth and divided it by about 4.5B years, Right? Using the snowball earth graph it suggests the water we have came in a few 'waves' of pure snow as the heat from the planet being at 3500F on average tends to melt just about everything so even iron falls as rain rather than as a solid.

A snow storm will put out a fire that evaporates rain before it hits the ground, it melts from the stored heat inside the earth rather than the sun did the dirty deed, that also means that is where the first oceans were, where it escaped in steam vents was at the highest part of the crust and that is where the original sea life started, as the ice was evaporated into clouds again dry land began and with the rain so did the first plants right down to the lowest parts and then the snow came again but seeds can survive being frozen so the recovery was much faster. The graph also points to the south going through an ice-age while the north did not, that should be easy to prove/disprove. I don't see us being on that level really.
That is 'adding weight'.



The new land created in Hawaii is redistributing that weight. In your world of the crusting subducting as fast as the rifts expand you might run into a problem when it comes to lava and the gasses that come out as they would have to be replaced without the crust dipping down. In a ball that is connected when you take some liquid out and create a 'bump' that has to be replaced. and if it heats up and cools down at a rate that varies. When the core is as cold as outer space what will the dia. of the earth be?
 
MHz
+1
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

While all you can do is troll. You add nothing to the discussion in every thread you infect. You do not enter into conversation . You,re stuff
is like the scribbling on a breakfast cereal box.

I'm probably going to 'borrow' parts if your post from time to time. If it bothers you, sue me, the case should come to trial in 2119.
 
MHz
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Only on an internet forum, can you watch a few youtube videos and overnight become an "expert" in whatever field you desire...
Man.....you guys take yourselves way too seriously.....

Anytime you cover something new you end up having an opinion. You read fictional romance novels that is more than a few parts, I assume your summation would include a few things you read in the series.
I'm pretty sure somebody who watched the vid past the few seconds you admit to watching would end up with a better summation but you make it about you still being the only one that has an opinion worth voicing when the facts point to you being the one that should go into 'read-only' mode for the duration of the topic being talked about on any thread.
The books to the Indians just north of you are open, you claim to be smart, go find when they Indians stole all the money and spent it all and didn't leave a trace.


You are the one offering your opinion in places that you say you have no interest in and do it in a way that is never on topic. Why should you lack of social skills be picked on even it it means the collective you belong suffers the exposure a lot more than it affects you. It is your actions alone that determines how stupid you make the collective look in your insane support of the unsupportable. When the White Miners are donating living quarters for the whole village you know things under the Govt have to be insanely bad. That is criminal rather than a lack of social skills, why do you think so much effort goes into keeping it out of the news as much as possible.

You probably over-rate this place (and yourself of course) as being a fat conduit to the outside world. You are part of a group that is more isolated than the most remote Indian Village. Your crocodile tears don't impress me at all, I know the perfect way to make them go away, some real skin is the starting point.

Being as much of a Pilgrim as you are this is going to hurt, . . . once.
 
MHz
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by Torch light View Post

There are some factors leading to the earth expansion, while other factors lead to its contraction.

Did the earth pull the moons metal core out and have it become part of the earth so 4BYA the moon was it its closest ever yet it was now increasing the gap rather than the gap closing. (assume a collision would cause a break that would see all the pieces end up in the sun rather than becoming two heavenly bodies again.)


That core would also have to descend to the earth's core so a few 'waves' might happen if Hudson Bay and the Gulf of Mexico would impact zones for the moons core coming in as two big blobs of liquid iron.


Water at -300F hitting lava at 3,000F would also cause a bit of 'frothing' on a liquid ball that has been sinning the same for a billion years and will do so for billions of years after before some crust remains floating and it grows as it cools more magma.
 
MHz
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

Osiris, Jesus and Venus

Posted on December 30, 2018 by Louis Hissink
Various authors have noted a close parallel between the Osiris, Vedic and Christian cults, where each portrays a mother and a child, among other religious imageries.
Which makes me wonder whether these different cults focussed on the same physical event, the birth of Venus and the destruction of human civilisation during the 1st millennium, where the baby represents the birth of some cosmic prodigy, here Venus.
This interpretation is somewhat uber-Heinsohnian in that it further compresses the historical record by having the Vedic, Osiris and Roman cultures as contemporaries, and destroyed globally by the same cosmic agent.
I make two daring assumptions, the first based on the known clustering of radiometric dates as described by Briden and Gass, 1974, that 3 catastrophes occurred historically associated with exogenous agents, by which electric plasma forcings generated 3 distinct clusters of radiogenic deposits. The second is that known history of our era starts from the most recent “event”, here the Little Ice Age, before which history has simply been fabricateded by brain-addled, thought muddled monks and priests of the ruling elites who only saw what they believed.

One thing you will notice, the fewer quotes from the Bible the more they can write about what the 'hidden meanings' are. 30 days is as long as it should take to understand what the Bible promotes, if it takes longer than that you are being served, 'stuff', I have heard it you already know what that means.


If you collected all the lightening that happens in 1 day and made it into a single spark as it entered the iron core would it turn more of the liquid iron into gas?? Is that global warming 100,000 years in the future or does the heat rise up as soon as the hit is over and the charge still goes to the core but with not heat gain?


Can it even be proven that the charge we see coming from the clouds is coming back to earth and the sparks that go up are where the actual transition zone is and earth would be a battery that is running down more than it is charging up.

 
DaSleeper
#26
 
Torch light
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

Did the earth pull the moons metal core out and have it become part of the earth so 4BYA the moon was it its closest ever yet it was now increasing the gap rather than the gap closing. (assume a collision would cause a break that would see all the pieces end up in the sun rather than becoming two heavenly bodies again.)

The gravity of the hot earth pulls the cold moon, and keeps it in its distance from us (because of the Moon rotation around the earth.)
When the Moon was hotter, it was farther in distance from us .. then the Moon lost its heat more than the earth losing its heat, so it is logically the Moon has become relatively nearer to us than it had been before.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm
quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm
 
MHz
#28
Hot and cold do not change total weight or speed or direction. A heavy moon getting close could avoid a collision if she lost a lot of weight, dumping the core would do that and the earth would still go around the sun like always as the combined is still the same.



The core could not shift in a cold moon so the tidal lock could not have need established. It would not start up once the core was gone. Coming in at an angle and taking some time to get to the earth's core could be how our wobble was introduced.
 
petros
#29
Does the noise in your head bother the neighbours?
 
MHz
#30
No, it let's them know somebody is at home. They are starting to as why so many people the Jews meet die of a combination of diseases though. You want to field the Black Death one?? (that would be pretty low by any standard, even Attila the Hun would give it the thumbs down.
 

Similar Threads

2
The Planet Earth is You
by Cliffy | Aug 3rd, 2014
1
Planet Earth (Planet Erde)
by Andem | May 16th, 2008
13
Earth Like Planet Discovered
by CTV News | May 19th, 2007