Re: Who to vote for in Canadian federal election in 2019?
Oct 23rd, 2018
So I get it reduce our wage because it is just a number on a piece of paper to be competitive with a foreign countries number on a piece of paper no real change OK gotcha
So I get it reduce our wage because it is just a number on a piece of paper to be competitive with a foreign countries number on a piece of paper no real change OK gotcha
Did I not say wasteful Gov.? What part don't I understand? A bigger waste than some Bank theory you have is Welfare abuse, crack down on it put a limit how long one can be put on it without finding a job. It was originally set up to help a person that hit hard times to get back up and get back out into the workforce. Not the 10's of Billions of dollars industry it morphed into where people have figured out how to exploit it into a family financial plan passed on from generation to generation.
I watch the current barrage of "Ain't I a great guy?" TV commercials being mounted by Mr. Scheer and I think "Could this guy come across as any less sincere?"
Disability aside, we should replace social assistance with a Canadian Peace Corps. You sign up for the training period plus five years after that, it teaches you a trade or profession, and then puts you to work at slightly below the market rate for the work you're doing so as to give you an incentive to find the same or better work in the private sector.
It would be a win win: the government gets cheap labour and the applicant gets education and experience.
Did I not say wasteful Gov.? What part don't I understand? A bigger waste than some Bank theory you have is Welfare abuse, crack down on it put a limit how long one can be put on it without finding a job. It was originally set up to help a person that hit hard times to get back up and get back out into the workforce. Not the 10's of Billions of dollars industry it morphed into where people have figured out how to exploit it into a family financial plan passed on from generation to generation.
So an 18% workforce is fair? How about an 85% taxpaying workforce and take some of the burden off the 40% that are paying all the bills now? Why are we importing workers when we have 60% sitting waiting for a Gov. check?
The same taxpayer who presently finances social assistance, but at least:
1. We'd be getting something in return for the investment, and
2. Would be giving people a hand up that they might actually appreciate rather than just contemptuously throwing money at them without actually helping them up.
In the short term, it would actually be more expensive than now since paying social assistance is less expensive than providing actual education. In the long run though, many of them would enter the work force and earn higher wages and probably not return to social assistance. Plus we'd get work out of them for different government projects meaning that we could then reduce the civil service.
The Canadian Peace Corps could also contract out to the provinces for any work that they need done.
So after the Peace Corps and they don't get a job do we get to cut them off?
Given that they'd earn less than for equal work in the private sector, why would they even want to remain in the Peace Corps if the contract expires?
Assuming he still can't find work, then we continue to make him work at below market rate if that's what he really wants to do. That would save the taxpayer money in infrastructure construction, etc. Of course the Corps would not be unionized and would not be allowed to unionize either.
So an 18% workforce is fair? How about an 85% taxpaying workforce and take some of the burden off the 40% that are paying all the bills now? Why are we importing workers when we have 60% sitting waiting for a Gov. check?
Why do care as long as your bank account grows every year you are working or do you want it to grow after as well?? In high unemployment times retirement should be at 45.
Why do care as long as your bank account grows every year you are working or do you want it to grow after as well?? In high unemployment times retirement should be at 45.
================================================== ================================================== ===
Oh POOR MHz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Every time you comment- you reveal more fully how little you know about ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!
I care because I'm one of the 18% If I could keep most of the money I make I may have been able to retire at your 45 target letting someone else take my place in the work force. Isn't that fair for everyone?
The local collective is supposed to be the smart ones yet at every turn since I joined this site they have shown themselves to be much worse that the ones they claim are causing all the problems. That make the value of what you say about worth as much as a box of nails. By the time I check the info out for verification it turns into nothing but a lie.
It isn't like you can't smear Indians and Muslims here and get a few thumbs up for doing it at the same time. That doesn't make you moral, it makes you immoral. You cannot be a god fearing person and ditch the NT as being an ungodly document.
BTW, it is the collective that is out of ammo rather than it being me.
Conservative vs Liberal
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him..
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and Jesus silenced.
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh. A liberal will delete it because he or she is "offended."
Wilson-Raybould claimed $125K in spousal travel expenses during Trudeau mandate
Are you surprised by this news????????????????????????
After all, I DID SAY that although she is..............................................
apparently........................................ ..............
the BEST of LIE-berals............................................ ...
the fact is that she IS STILL A LIE-beral!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!
No sixteen dollar orange juice though . Well none that we have been told about .
Anything but Conservative.
Think about it.
Walter votes for those guys.
Serious answer: They're all okay this time around.